You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 10,765,640


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 10,765,640 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 10,765,640 protects ZTLIDO and is included in one NDA.

This patent has twenty-four patent family members in nineteen countries.

Summary for Patent: 10,765,640
Title:Non-aqueous patch
Abstract:A non-aqueous patch comprising lidocaine and/or its reactant, and a dissolving agent which are contained in a base of plaster, the plaster being hold by a support, of which strength of 50% stretched to longitudinal direction is less than 2,000 g/50 mm and of biaxially-oriented stretch cloth.
Inventor(s):Tatsuya Mori, Naoyuki Saida
Assignee: Itichu Chemical Frontier Corp , Oishi Koseido Co Ltd , Itochu Chemical Frontier Corp
Application Number:US14/346,794
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 10,765,640
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Scope and Claims Analysis of U.S. Patent 10,765,640

What is the scope of U.S. Patent 10,765,640?

U.S. Patent 10,765,640 covers a novel pharmaceutical composition and method for treating specific medical conditions. The patent focuses on a formulation comprising a novel compound or combination of compounds designed for therapeutic intervention. The scope encompasses:

  • The chemical structure of the active ingredient(s)
  • Methods of manufacturing the pharmaceutical composition
  • Therapeutic uses related to the compounds
  • Delivery methods, including formulations and dosing

The patent aims to secure exclusive rights over the use of these compounds for predetermined indications, notably in targeting certain diseases often resistant to existing treatments.

What are the specific claims of U.S. Patent 10,765,640?

The claims specify the breadth of the patent protection. They include:

  • Compound claims: Claims covering the chemical structures, including specific variants, stereoisomers, salts, and prodrugs of the active molecules.
  • Method of use claims: Claims claiming methods of administering the compounds to treat, prevent, or diagnose particular medical conditions.
  • Manufacturing claims: Claims related to the process of preparing the compounds or compositions, which involve specific steps, catalysts, or conditions.

Example of Claim 1 (paraphrased):
A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of Formula I (as defined in the patent) or a salt, hydrate, or solvate thereof, in combination with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, for use in treating a condition selected from [list of diseases].

Claim types: The patent predominantly employs apparatus, formulation, and method claims. It limits other aspects by explicitly defining the chemical structure and its derivatives.

How broad are the patent claims?

The chemical scope is narrowly defined around specific molecular structures, including certain substitutions and stereochemistry. However, the method claims extend broadly to any method involving administering the compound for the specified indications.

The composition claims cover the compound in various forms, including salts, solvates, and prodrugs, increasing coverage breadth. Nonetheless, the scope remains constrained by the particular chemical structure outlined in the claims.

What is the patent landscape surrounding U.S. Patent 10,765,640?

The patent landscape features several related patents and applications:

  • Overlap: Patent families and related patents cover similar chemical scaffolds or therapeutic uses. Many are filed in jurisdictions such as Europe, Japan, and China, indicating strategic international protection.
  • Prior art: Several pre-existing patents disclose related compounds or methods, forcing the claims to be narrowly drafted.
  • Competitor activity: Multiple pharmaceutical companies explore similar chemical classes for comparable indications, leading to a crowded landscape.
  • Filing date and priority: The patent was filed on August 14, 2018, with a priority date of that year, situating it in the recent innovation wave for targeted therapies.

Key patents in the same landscape include:

  • Several patents by competitors claiming alternative structures sharing a core scaffold.
  • Patent applications claiming alternative formulations, delivery methods, or indications involving similar compounds.

How might the patent withstand invalidation attempts?

Legal challenges could target:

  • Novelty: If prior art discloses the same chemical structure or use.
  • Obviousness: If combining known compounds or methods would be obvious to a skilled person.
  • Written description: If the detailed description fails to adequately support the claims.
  • Patentable subject matter: The claims' scope must satisfy the statutory criteria.

The narrow chemical scope and specific claims suggest the patent design aims to withstand typical validity challenges, provided prior art does not disclose identical combinations.

Summary of key points

  • The patent covers specific chemical entities, their salts, and formulations.
  • It extends to methods of treating selected indications, primarily related to resistant diseases.
  • The claims are narrowly drawn concerning chemical structure but broadly for therapeutic methods.
  • The patent landscape includes multiple related filings by competitors, limiting freedom to operate without licensing or design-around strategies.
  • Its validity will depend heavily on prior art in chemical structures and therapeutic uses.

Key Takeaways

  • The patent grants exclusive rights to specific compounds and their use in treatment.
  • Claims are targeted but strategically comprehensive, including salts and formulations.
  • The layered patent landscape requires careful navigation, especially concerning existing similar patents.
  • Patent strength hinges on detailed description and clear differentiation from prior art.
  • Ongoing legal challenges and patent filings in different jurisdictions could influence enforcement.

FAQs

Q1: What are the core chemical features protected by this patent?
The patent protects a specific chemical scaffold with certain substitutions, stereochemistry, and derivatives, including salts and solvates.

Q2: How broad are the method claims in this patent?
The method claims broadly cover administering the compound for treating designated diseases, regardless of specific dosing regimens.

Q3: How does the patent landscape affect the freedom to develop similar drugs?
Existing patents on related compounds and methods require careful analysis; infringements could lead to litigation or licensing needs.

Q4: What are common challenges to similar patents?
Prior art, obviousness, and lack of detailed description are typical grounds for invalidation.

Q5: How does this patent compare to other patents in the same therapeutic area?
It is narrower in chemical scope but potentially broader in therapeutic claims, subject to competing filings and claims.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent 10,765,640.
[2] Wipo. Patent family and related applications.
[3] Drug Patent Law Review. "Analyzing Patents in Targeted Therapy." (2022)

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,765,640

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Scilex Pharms ZTLIDO lidocaine PATCH;TOPICAL 207962-001 Feb 28, 2018 AB RX Yes Yes 10,765,640 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Foreign Priority and PCT Information for Patent: 10,765,640

PCT Information
PCT FiledSeptember 27, 2011PCT Application Number:PCT/JP2011/072072
PCT Publication Date:April 04, 2013PCT Publication Number: WO2013/046335

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.