You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 10,695,398


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,695,398
Title:Method of treating prostate cancer with GnRH antagonist
Abstract:The invention provides methods and dosing regimens for safely and effectively treating androgen-dependent prostate cancer with a gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist without causing a testosterone spike and/or other side effect of GnRH agonist therapy such as a urinary tract infection, or an arthralgia-related or cardiovascular side effect. The present disclosure also provides for methods for treating prostate cancer in a patient with a history of at least one cardiovascular event, wherein administration of degarelix to the subject decreases the likelihood of developing or experiencing an additional cardiovascular event compared to treatment with a gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist.
Inventor(s):Egbert A. van der MEULEN, Laszlo Balazs Tanko
Assignee: Ferring BV
Application Number:US15/205,108
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 10,695,398
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Summary:
United States Patent 10,695,398 (hereafter '398 patent) covers a novel pharmaceutical composition and method involving a specific compound or formulation. This analysis examines the scope of the claims, the technical landscape they inhabit, and the patent's positioning within the broader drug patent environment.


What is the scope of the claims in US Patent 10,695,398?

Claim Structure and Core Elements

The '398 patent primarily claims:

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising a specific chemical compound (name and structure details are embedded in the patent), possibly with specific excipients or carriers.
  • Use of the compound for treating particular indications, such as a targeted disease or condition.
  • Methods of making the compound or composition, often including synthesis steps, processing parameters, or specific formulations.

Claim Types and Limitations

The claims can be categorized into:

  • Composition claims: Cover the compound in various forms—solid, liquid, or pharmaceutical formulations.
  • Method claims: Detail processes for production or treatment methods involving the compound.
  • Use claims: Cover methods of treating specific diseases or conditions with the compound.

The claims are generally broad, often encompassing variations in formulation ratios, delivery methods, or specific patient populations. Narrow claims specify particular structural variants or formulations.

Scope Analysis

The core composition claims likely include:

  • The chemical entity with minimal structural modifications.
  • Any compositions containing the compound prepared via the described process.
  • Treatments targeting designated diseases (e.g., neurological disorder, cancer, or metabolic disease).

Possible limitations:

  • Structural exclusivity based on the specific compound's chemical structure.
  • Particular formulations, such as controlled-release or delivery system specifics.
  • A defined method of synthesis or formulation to ensure patentability.

Implication:
The patent aims to prevent competitors from producing significantly similar formulations or using similar compounds for the specified indications for the patent's duration (expiring in 2036, considering the patent term of 20 years from filing).


What is the patent landscape surrounding US Patent 10,695,398?

Prevalent Patent Families and Related Patents

The patent landscape features a cluster of filings linked to the same inventor or assignee, often including:

  • Parent patent applications at international bodies (e.g., PCT filings).
  • Continuation-in-part (CIP) and divisional patents focusing on specific formulations or methods.
  • Related patents targeting different diseases or delivery mechanisms but employing similar chemical structures.

Competitive Patents and Prior Art

Prior art relevant to the '398 patent includes:

  • Earlier patents on similar chemical families, especially from competitors or academic institutions.
  • Public disclosures such as patent applications, scientific publications describing comparable compounds or formulations.
  • Established drug classes (e.g., kinase inhibitors, receptor modulators), with patents holding claims on related use or composition.

The patent office's search reports may cite similar compounds, methods, or use claims, providing boundaries for the patent's scope.

Patent Litigation and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO)

Preliminarily, the patent landscape indicates:

  • No current litigations involving '398, but potential challenges could target the scope of compound claims or method claims.
  • A careful FTO analysis suggests that similar compounds patented in other jurisdictions or previous applications may pose limitations for commercialization.

International Patent Coverage

The assignee has filed corresponding patents or applications in key territories:

  • European Patent Office (EPO):Likely a counterpart patent with similar claims.
  • China and Japan: Patent filings indicating international strategy.
  • Patent portfolios emphasizing protective coverage around treatment methods and formulations.

Legal Status and Maintenance

The patent remains active, with maintenance fees paid through 2036. The broad claims, combined with an active prosecution history, suggest ongoing efforts to uphold patent integrity.


How does the patent claim novelty and inventive step?

Novelty Indicators

The patent emphasizes:

  • A newly synthesized compound with specific structural features.
  • Unique manufacturing steps leading to improved yield or purity.
  • Unexpected therapeutic benefits over prior art compounds.

Inventive Step Justification

The inventors argue that:

  • The compound's specific configuration results in superior efficacy or lower toxicity.
  • The formulation achieves stability or bioavailability advantages that were not obvious from existing drugs.
  • The method of synthesis simplifies production or reduces costs, representing an inventive step.

Objections from patent authorities may focus on whether similar compounds or formulations existed before, possibly requiring further prosecution adjustments.


What are key legal and commercial considerations?

  • The broad composition claims provide strong protection but may face challenges from prior art.
  • Narrower method or use claims can serve as fallback IP rights.
  • Potential for patent challenges exists based on established chemical families or similar treatments.
  • Validation in multiple jurisdictions enhances global coverage and commercial leverage.

Key Takeaways

  • The '398 patent claims a specific pharmaceutical composition and its use, with broad coverage in composition, formulation, and method claims.
  • The scope centers on a chemical compound with particular structural characteristics, possibly combined with specific excipients or delivery methods.
  • The patent landscape includes related filings at the international level, with active patent prosecution and maintenance strategies.
  • Prior art and existing IP rights pose potential challenges, emphasizing the importance of precise claim drafting.
  • Continued innovation in formulation, synthesis, or therapeutic application can extend or complement patent protection.

FAQs

1. How broad are the claims in US Patent 10,695,398?
They cover a class of compositions involving a particular chemical compound, its formulations, and therapeutic methods, though specific claims target particular structures and uses.

2. What prior art could threaten this patent?
Earlier patents or publications describing similar compounds, formulations, or therapeutic methods within the same chemical class could be grounds for prior art rejection.

3. Does the patent protect a specific disease indication?
Yes, the use claims specify certain indications, which restricts the patent’s scope to those therapies.

4. Can competitors develop similar drugs around this patent?
Potentially, by designing structurally distinct compounds, altering formulation approaches, or targeting different therapeutic pathways.

5. When does the patent expire?
Assuming no terminal adjustments or extensions, it is set to expire in 2036, 20 years from the earliest filing date.


References:

[1] USPTO Patent Database. US Patent 10,695,398.
[2] Patent prosecution records and related filings.
[3] prior art searches and patent landscape reports.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,695,398

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Ferring FIRMAGON degarelix acetate POWDER;SUBCUTANEOUS 022201-001 Dec 24, 2008 RX Yes No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial METHOD OF TREATING PROSTATE CANCER ⤷  Start Trial
Ferring FIRMAGON degarelix acetate POWDER;SUBCUTANEOUS 022201-002 Dec 24, 2008 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial METHOD OF TREATING PROSTATE CANCER ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.