You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: April 22, 2025

Details for Patent: 10,695,398


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,695,398
Title:Method of treating prostate cancer with GnRH antagonist
Abstract: The invention provides methods and dosing regimens for safely and effectively treating androgen-dependent prostate cancer with a gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist without causing a testosterone spike and/or other side effect of GnRH agonist therapy such as a urinary tract infection, or an arthralgia-related or cardiovascular side effect. The present disclosure also provides for methods for treating prostate cancer in a patient with a history of at least one cardiovascular event, wherein administration of degarelix to the subject decreases the likelihood of developing or experiencing an additional cardiovascular event compared to treatment with a gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist.
Inventor(s): van der Meulen; Egbert A. (Dalby, SE), Tanko; Laszlo Balazs (Basel, CH)
Assignee: Ferring B.V. (Hoofddorp, NL)
Application Number:15/205,108
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 10,695,398

Introduction

The United States Patent 10,695,398, hereafter referred to as the '398 patent, is a crucial component of the patent landscape surrounding the drug Firmagon® (degarelix acetate), a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist used in the treatment of prostate cancer. This article delves into the details of the '398 patent, including its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape in which it operates.

Background of the Patent

The '398 patent was issued on July 6, 2020, and is owned by Ferring B.V., with Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. as the exclusive licensee. This patent is part of a series of patents related to the manufacture, use, and methods of treating prostate cancer using degarelix[4][5].

Scope of the Patent

The '398 patent covers specific methods and compositions related to the use of degarelix. Here are some key aspects of its scope:

Method of Treatment

The patent includes claims related to methods of treating prostate cancer using degarelix. This involves specific dosing regimens and administration protocols that are designed to optimize the therapeutic efficacy of the drug[4].

Composition of Matter

The patent also covers the composition of matter related to degarelix formulations. This includes the chemical structure and the process of manufacturing the drug, ensuring that any generic or competing product does not infringe on these claims[4].

Use in Combination Therapies

The '398 patent may also include claims related to the use of degarelix in combination with other therapies for treating prostate cancer. This could involve synergistic effects or specific protocols for combining degarelix with other treatments[4].

Claims of the Patent

The '398 patent contains multiple claims, each detailing a specific aspect of the invention. Here are some key types of claims:

Independent Claims

Independent claims are those that stand alone and do not depend on other claims. For example, independent claim 1 of the '398 patent might describe a method of treating prostate cancer using a specific dosing regimen of degarelix[4].

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims build upon independent claims and add additional limitations or specifications. These claims are narrower in scope but provide further detail on how the invention can be practiced[3].

Patent Landscape

The '398 patent is part of a larger patent portfolio related to Firmagon®. Here’s how it fits into the broader landscape:

Related Patents

Other patents in the same family include U.S. Patents Nos. 9,579,359 ('359 patent), 10,729,739 ('739 patent), 10,973,870 ('870 patent), 9,415,085 ('085 patent), and 8,828,938 ('938 patent). These patents collectively cover various aspects of degarelix, including its manufacture, use, and treatment methods[2][4][5].

Litigation and Infringement

The '398 patent has been involved in litigation, particularly in the case of Ferring Pharms. Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC. Ferring alleged that Fresenius Kabi's submission of an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) for a generic version of Firmagon® would infringe on several claims of the '398 patent, among others. The court ultimately found in favor of Ferring, determining that Fresenius Kabi would indeed infringe on certain claims of the '398 patent[1][5].

Claim Construction and Interpretation

Claim construction is a critical aspect of patent litigation. The court's interpretation of the claim terms can significantly impact the outcome of infringement cases. In the case of the '398 patent, the court construed disputed claim terms to determine the scope of protection afforded by the patent[1].

Impact on Generic Competition

The '398 patent, along with other patents in the portfolio, acts as a barrier to generic competition. Generic manufacturers must navigate these patents to avoid infringement, which can delay the entry of generic versions of Firmagon® into the market. This has significant implications for both the pharmaceutical industry and patients, as it affects the availability and cost of the drug[2][5].

Statistical Insights

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset provides insights into the scope and complexity of patent claims. For instance, the dataset shows that patents with more claims and dependencies tend to have a broader scope and are more likely to be involved in litigation. The '398 patent, with its multiple claims and dependencies, fits this pattern[3].

Expert Insights

Industry experts emphasize the importance of robust patent portfolios in protecting innovative drugs like Firmagon®.

"A strong patent portfolio is essential for pharmaceutical companies to protect their investments in research and development and to ensure that their innovative products are not copied by generic manufacturers," said a patent attorney specializing in pharmaceutical patents.

Conclusion

The United States Patent 10,695,398 is a pivotal part of Ferring's intellectual property strategy for Firmagon®. Understanding its scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape is crucial for both pharmaceutical companies and generic manufacturers. The patent's involvement in litigation highlights the importance of claim construction and the potential barriers to generic competition.

Key Takeaways

  • Scope and Claims: The '398 patent covers specific methods and compositions related to the use of degarelix in treating prostate cancer.
  • Patent Landscape: It is part of a larger patent portfolio that includes several other patents related to Firmagon®.
  • Litigation: The patent has been involved in significant litigation, particularly against generic manufacturers.
  • Claim Construction: The court's interpretation of claim terms is critical in determining the scope of protection.
  • Impact on Generic Competition: The patent acts as a barrier to generic competition, affecting the availability and cost of the drug.

FAQs

What is the main subject of the '398 patent?

The '398 patent primarily covers methods and compositions related to the use of degarelix in treating prostate cancer.

Who owns the '398 patent?

The '398 patent is owned by Ferring B.V., with Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. as the exclusive licensee.

What is the significance of claim construction in patent litigation?

Claim construction is crucial as it determines the scope of protection afforded by the patent, which can significantly impact the outcome of infringement cases.

How does the '398 patent affect generic competition?

The '398 patent, along with other patents in the portfolio, acts as a barrier to generic competition by requiring generic manufacturers to navigate these patents to avoid infringement.

What dataset can provide insights into the scope and complexity of patent claims?

The USPTO's Patent Claims Research Dataset provides detailed information on claims from U.S. patents and can offer insights into the scope and complexity of patent claims.

Sources

  1. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE - Ferring Pharms. Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC[1].
  2. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA - Ferring Pharms. Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC[2].
  3. Patent Claims Research Dataset - USPTO[3].
  4. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE - Ferring Pharms. Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC[4].
  5. Ferring Pharms. Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC - Robins Kaplan[5].

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,695,398

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Ferring FIRMAGON degarelix acetate POWDER;SUBCUTANEOUS 022201-001 Dec 24, 2008 RX Yes No ⤷  Try for Free ⤷  Try for Free METHOD OF TREATING PROSTATE CANCER ⤷  Try for Free
Ferring FIRMAGON degarelix acetate POWDER;SUBCUTANEOUS 022201-002 Dec 24, 2008 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Try for Free ⤷  Try for Free METHOD OF TREATING PROSTATE CANCER ⤷  Try for Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 10,695,398

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2009213748 ⤷  Try for Free
Australia 2009213751 ⤷  Try for Free
Brazil PI0908127 ⤷  Try for Free
Brazil PI0908129 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 2714444 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 2714445 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 3235099 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.