You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: May 23, 2025

Details for Patent: 10,695,397


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 10,695,397 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 10,695,397 protects MYCAPSSA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has thirteen patent family members in nine countries.

Summary for Patent: 10,695,397
Title:Method of treating diseases
Abstract: Methods of treating acromegaly in a subject are described herein. Exemplary methods include orally administering to the subject at least once daily at least one dosage form comprising octreotide, wherein the octreotide in each dosage form is 20 mg, and wherein the administering occurs at least 1 hour before a meal or at least 2 hours after a meal.
Inventor(s): Mamluk; Roni (Mazkeret Batya, IL), Teichman; Sam L. (Oakland, CA)
Assignee: Chiasma, Inc. (Needham, MA)
Application Number:16/233,749
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

United States Patent 10,695,397: A Detailed Analysis of Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Introduction

The United States Patent 10,695,397, hereafter referred to as the '397 patent, is a significant patent in the pharmaceutical sector, particularly related to the treatment of certain diseases. This analysis will delve into the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding this patent.

Background of the Patent

The '397 patent is part of a series of patents related to the treatment of diseases such as acromegaly and other conditions. It is associated with the drug product MYCAPSSA®, which is an oral formulation of octreotide, a somatostatin analog used to treat acromegaly and other conditions[2].

Scope of the Patent

The '397 patent covers a method of treating diseases, specifically focusing on the administration and dosage forms of octreotide. Here are some key aspects of its scope:

Method of Treatment

The patent describes a method for treating acromegaly and other diseases by administering a specific dosage form of octreotide. This method involves the use of oral capsules, which is a unique delivery mechanism compared to traditional injectable forms[1].

Dosage Forms

The patent specifies the dosage forms and the administration schedule for the treatment. This includes the formulation of the drug, the dosage strength, and the frequency of administration. The detailed description ensures that the method is precise and reproducible[1].

Disease Coverage

The patent is not limited to acromegaly but also covers other diseases and conditions that can be treated with somatostatin analogs. This broadens the applicability of the method and the drug formulation[1].

Claims of the Patent

The claims of the '397 patent are crucial as they define the legal boundaries of what is protected under the patent. Here are some key claims:

Independent Claims

The patent includes independent claims that describe the method of treatment, the dosage forms, and the administration schedule. These claims are broad and encompass various aspects of the treatment method[1].

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims further specify the details of the independent claims, such as the specific dosage strengths, the material composition of the capsules, and the manufacturing process. These claims provide additional protection by narrowing down the scope to specific embodiments[1].

Patent Landscape

The '397 patent is part of a larger patent landscape that includes several related patents and ongoing litigation.

Related Patents

The '397 patent is one of several patents associated with MYCAPSSA®, including patents such as 8,329,198, 8,535,695, 9,265,812, and others. These patents collectively protect various aspects of the drug product, including its formulation, administration, and manufacturing process[2].

Litigation and Settlements

The '397 patent has been involved in litigation, particularly in the context of Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs). For instance, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A. has been involved in lawsuits against generic drug manufacturers like Teva Pharmaceuticals, seeking to prevent the infringement of the patents-in-suit, including the '397 patent[2][5].

Impact on Generic Drug Manufacturers

The '397 patent and related patents pose significant barriers for generic drug manufacturers. Here’s how:

Paragraph IV Certification

Generic manufacturers often file ANDAs with a Paragraph IV certification, which challenges the validity of the patents-in-suit. However, settlements and court rulings can enjoin generic manufacturers from infringing the patents, delaying their market entry[5].

Settlement Agreements

Settlement agreements, such as the one between Chiesi and Teva, can allow generic manufacturers to enter the market after the expiration of the patents or under specific authorization. These agreements can also dismiss all claims and counterclaims without prejudice, allowing for future legal actions[5].

Economic and Market Implications

The '397 patent and its related patents have significant economic and market implications:

Market Exclusivity

The patents provide market exclusivity to the original drug manufacturer, allowing them to maintain a monopoly on the market until the patents expire. This can result in higher prices for the drug and limited access to generic alternatives[5].

Innovation and R&D

The protection offered by these patents incentivizes innovation and research and development in the pharmaceutical sector. Companies are more likely to invest in R&D when they can protect their intellectual property and recoup their investments[3].

International Patent Landscape

The '397 patent is part of an international patent landscape, with similar patents and applications filed in other jurisdictions.

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

The PCT allows for the international filing of patent applications, which can then be pursued in various countries. This facilitates global protection for the method and drug formulation described in the '397 patent[4].

Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC)

The CPC system helps in classifying patents across different jurisdictions, making it easier to search and analyze patents globally. This system is crucial for understanding the broader international patent landscape related to the '397 patent[4].

Conclusion

The United States Patent 10,695,397 is a critical patent in the pharmaceutical industry, particularly for the treatment of acromegaly and other conditions using octreotide. Its scope and claims are detailed and specific, providing broad protection for the method of treatment and the drug formulation.

Key Takeaways

  • Method of Treatment: The patent describes a method for treating diseases using oral octreotide capsules.
  • Dosage Forms: The patent specifies the dosage forms and administration schedule.
  • Related Patents: The '397 patent is part of a series of patents protecting MYCAPSSA®.
  • Litigation and Settlements: The patent has been involved in ANDA litigation and settlements.
  • Market Implications: The patent provides market exclusivity and incentivizes innovation.

FAQs

  1. What is the main subject of the '397 patent? The main subject of the '397 patent is a method of treating diseases, specifically acromegaly, using oral octreotide capsules.

  2. What is the significance of the dosage forms described in the patent? The dosage forms described in the patent are significant because they provide a unique oral delivery mechanism for octreotide, which is traditionally administered via injection.

  3. How does the '397 patent impact generic drug manufacturers? The '397 patent impacts generic drug manufacturers by preventing them from infringing the patents-in-suit, thereby delaying their market entry until the patents expire or under specific authorization.

  4. What is the role of Paragraph IV certification in ANDA filings related to the '397 patent? Paragraph IV certification allows generic manufacturers to challenge the validity of the patents-in-suit, but settlements and court rulings can enjoin them from infringing the patents.

  5. How does the '397 patent fit into the international patent landscape? The '397 patent is part of an international patent landscape, with similar patents and applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and classified using the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) system.

Sources

  1. US10695397B2 - Method of treating diseases - Google Patents
  2. in the united states district court - RPX Insight
  3. Patent Claims Research Dataset - USPTO
  4. Research and Course Guides: Patent Searching, Advanced: Overview - Clemson University
  5. ANDA Litigation Settlements | Hatch-Waxman | Robins Kaplan LLP

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,695,397

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Chiesi MYCAPSSA octreotide acetate CAPSULE, DELAYED RELEASE;ORAL 208232-001 Jun 26, 2020 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Try for Free ⤷  Try for Free USE OF ORAL OCTREOTIDE FOR LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE TREATMENT IN ACROMEGALY PATIENTS WHO HAVE RESPONDED TO AND TOLERATED TREATMENT WITH OCTREOTIDE OR LANREOTIDE ⤷  Try for Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 10,695,397

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2016215350 ⤷  Try for Free
Australia 2022201269 ⤷  Try for Free
Australia 2024203939 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 2975599 ⤷  Try for Free
European Patent Office 3253401 ⤷  Try for Free
Hong Kong 1247818 ⤷  Try for Free
Israel 277235 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.