You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: May 24, 2025

Details for Patent: 10,617,695


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 10,617,695 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 10,617,695 protects LASTACAFT and is included in one NDA.

This patent has forty-six patent family members in thirty countries.

Summary for Patent: 10,617,695
Title:Ophthalmic compositions containing alcaftadine
Abstract: Compositions, kits and methods for the treatment or prevention of ocular allergies and inflammation and the symptoms thereof containing alcaftadine or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
Inventor(s): Ingerman; Avner (Bellmead, NJ), Janssens; Frans (Bonheiden, BE), Megens; Anton (Beerse, BE), Abelson; Mark B. (Andover, MA)
Assignee: Vistakon Pharmaceuticals, LLC (Jacksonville, FL)
Application Number:15/267,645
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Formulation;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Understanding the Scope and Claims of United States Patent 10,617,695

Introduction

Patent 10,617,695, hereafter referred to as the '695 patent, is a significant intellectual property asset in the pharmaceutical sector. To fully comprehend its implications, it is crucial to delve into the patent's scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape.

Patent Overview

The '695 patent is associated with pharmaceutical products, specifically generic drugs, and is listed in the FDA's "Orange Book" which catalogs approved drug products with therapeutic equivalence evaluations[5].

Claims of the Patent

The claims of a patent are the legally binding definitions of what the patent covers. For the '695 patent, these claims would typically include:

Independent Claims

Independent claims are the broadest claims in a patent and define the overall scope of the invention. These claims are critical as they set the boundaries of what is considered infringing.

Dependent Claims

Dependent claims are narrower and build upon the independent claims. They often add specific details or limitations to the broader independent claims, providing additional protection for specific aspects of the invention.

Claim Construction

Claim construction is a legal process where the court interprets the meaning of the claims in a patent. This process is crucial in determining the scope of the patent and whether an accused product infringes on the patent. The Federal Circuit has emphasized that claim construction is a question of law, subject to de novo review on appeal[2].

Patent Scope and Breadth

The scope of a patent, including the '695 patent, is determined by the claims and the specification (the detailed description of the invention). The Patent Claims Research Dataset by the USPTO provides insights into how patent scope is measured, including metrics such as claim-level statistics and document-level statistics. These metrics help in understanding the breadth and complexity of the patent claims[3].

Patent Landscape

The patent landscape for pharmaceuticals is highly competitive and complex. Patents like the '695 patent are often part of a larger portfolio that includes multiple patents covering different aspects of a drug or its manufacturing process. The landscape is also influenced by regulatory requirements, such as those set by the FDA, and the need to list patents in the Orange Book to assert infringement claims against generic manufacturers[5].

Infringement and Litigation

The '695 patent has been involved in litigation, with the patent owner alleging infringement by generic manufacturers. For instance, in the case against Gland, the patent owner sought to enjoin Gland from manufacturing, using, or selling a drug that allegedly infringed the '215 and '695 patents. This highlights the importance of patent litigation in protecting intellectual property rights in the pharmaceutical industry[5].

Quality and Clarity of Patent Applications

The quality and clarity of patent applications are critical in ensuring that patents meet statutory requirements. The GAO has recommended that the USPTO define patent quality more consistently and use additional tools to ensure clarity in patent applications. This is particularly relevant for pharmaceutical patents, where broad or unclear claims can lead to difficulties in examination and potential invalidation[4].

Economic and Regulatory Impact

Pharmaceutical patents like the '695 patent have significant economic and regulatory implications. They can affect the availability and pricing of drugs, as well as the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry. The USPTO's efforts to improve patent quality and clarity are aimed at ensuring that patents are granted only for inventions that meet the statutory requirements, thereby promoting innovation and fair competition[4].

Key Terms and Definitions

Clear definitions of key terms are essential in patent applications to avoid ambiguity and ensure that the claims are definite. The lack of clear definitions can lead to difficulties in patent examination and potential legal challenges. The USPTO has developed tools, such as the Application Readiness Review Form, to help ensure that patent applications are thorough and clear[4].

International Considerations

While the '695 patent is a U.S. patent, the global nature of the pharmaceutical industry means that international considerations are important. The USPTO provides resources for understanding the IPR environment in various countries, which is crucial for companies operating globally[1].

Conclusion

Understanding the scope and claims of the '695 patent involves a detailed analysis of its legal, technical, and economic aspects. Here are the key takeaways:

  • Claims and Scope: The patent's claims define its scope, with independent and dependent claims working together to protect the invention.
  • Claim Construction: Legal interpretation of claims is crucial in determining infringement.
  • Patent Landscape: The patent is part of a competitive and complex landscape influenced by regulatory and legal factors.
  • Infringement and Litigation: Patent litigation is a key mechanism for protecting intellectual property rights.
  • Quality and Clarity: Ensuring clarity and quality in patent applications is vital for meeting statutory requirements.
  • Economic and Regulatory Impact: Pharmaceutical patents have significant economic and regulatory implications.

Key Takeaways

  • Patent Claims: The claims of a patent are its legally binding definitions.
  • Claim Construction: This is a legal process interpreting the meaning of claims.
  • Patent Scope: Determined by claims and the specification.
  • Patent Landscape: Highly competitive and influenced by regulatory requirements.
  • Infringement: Litigation is common to protect intellectual property rights.
  • Quality and Clarity: Essential for ensuring patents meet statutory requirements.

FAQs

Q: What is the significance of claim construction in patent law? A: Claim construction is the legal process of interpreting the meaning of patent claims, which is crucial in determining the scope of the patent and whether an accused product infringes on the patent.

Q: How does the USPTO ensure the quality of patent applications? A: The USPTO uses various tools, including the Application Readiness Review Form, and has implemented measures to improve the clarity and quality of patent applications, such as defining patent quality more consistently and reassessing examination times.

Q: Why are pharmaceutical patents listed in the FDA's Orange Book? A: Pharmaceutical patents are listed in the Orange Book to assert infringement claims against generic manufacturers and to provide transparency about the intellectual property associated with approved drug products.

Q: What are the economic implications of pharmaceutical patents? A: Pharmaceutical patents can significantly impact the availability, pricing, and competition in the pharmaceutical industry, affecting both the innovator companies and generic manufacturers.

Q: How does international intellectual property law affect U.S. patents? A: While U.S. patents are governed by U.S. law, international considerations are important due to the global nature of the pharmaceutical industry, and resources like those provided by the USPTO help in understanding IPR environments in various countries.

Sources

  1. USPTO - Search for patents
  2. CAFC - VASCULAR SOLUTIONS LLC v. MEDTRONIC, INC.
  3. USPTO - Patent Claims Research Dataset
  4. GAO - Intellectual Property: Patent Office Should Define Quality, Reassess ...
  5. United States District Court for the District of Illinois - Case No. 1:20-cv-04094

More… ↓

⤷  Try for Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,617,695

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Abbvie LASTACAFT alcaftadine SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 022134-001 Jul 28, 2010 OTC Yes Yes 10,617,695 ⤷  Try for Free Y USE OF LASTACAFT TO TEMPORARY RELIEVE ITCHY EYES DUE TO POLLEN, RAGWEED, GRASS, ANIMAL HAIR AND DANDER ⤷  Try for Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 10,617,695

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 060278 ⤷  Try for Free
Argentina 111697 ⤷  Try for Free
Australia 2007234957 ⤷  Try for Free
Brazil PI0710085 ⤷  Try for Free
Canada 2648115 ⤷  Try for Free
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.