You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Details for Patent: 10,533,174


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,533,174
Title:Splice-region antisense composition and method
Abstract:Antisense compositions targeted against an mRNA sequence coding for a selected protein, at a region having its 5′ end from 1 to about 25 base pairs downstream of a normal splice acceptor junction in the preprocessed mRNA, are disclosed. The antisense compound is RNase-inactive, and is preferably a phosphorodiamidate-linked morpholino oligonucleotide. Such targeting is effective to inhibit natural mRNA splice processing, produce splice variant mRNAs, and inhibit normal expression of the protein.
Inventor(s):Patrick L. Iversen, Robert Hudziak
Assignee: Sarepta Therapeutics Inc
Application Number:US15/723,966
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 10,533,174

Introduction
U.S. Patent No. 10,533,174, granted on January 7, 2020, represents a significant intellectual property asset within the pharmaceutical landscape. This patent encompasses innovative claims that potentially cover novel compounds, formulations, or methods of use, depending on its specific inventive focus. As a foundational element in drug development and commercialization, understanding its scope, claims, and surrounding patent landscape is crucial for strategic planning, licensing, and competitive positioning.


Overview of the Patent

The '174 patent broadly claims a novel chemical entity or a specific therapeutic application, likely involving a new class of drug, an improved formulation, or a unique method of treatment. The patent is assigned to a biotech or pharmaceutical company, indicating its strategic importance in their pipeline.

Type of Patent:
This patent appears to fall under the category of compound patents, method-of-use patents, or formulation patents, which are common in pharmaceutical innovations. Its primary protection is granted through carefully crafted claims that define the scope.


Scope of the Patent

The scope delineates the boundaries of the patent rights, primarily expressed through its claim set. As is customary in pharmaceutical patents, the scope can cover:

  • Compound claims: Novel chemical entities with specific structural features.
  • Method claims: Specific methods of synthesizing or administering the compound.
  • Use claims: Therapeutic applications or indications for treating specific diseases.
  • Formulation claims: Variations in formulations that enhance stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance.

For U.S. Patent 10,533,174, the claims likely focus on a particular chemical structure, potentially a new molecular scaffold or derivative with enhanced efficacy, reduced side effects, or improved pharmacokinetics.


Analysis of the Claims

1. Independent Claims
The core of the patent, independent claims, define the invention's breadth. They likely specify the chemical structure with particular substituents, broadening the coverage to include functionally similar analogs. Alternatively, if the patent claims a method or use, the independent claims specify the therapeutic application or process steps.

2. Dependent Claims
Dependent claims narrow the scope by adding limitations or specifying particular embodiments—such as specific dosages, formulations, or treatment regimens. These claims serve to reinforce the patent's enforceability by covering various embodiments.

3. Claim Language and Scope
The language likely combines chemical structure definitions with functional language (e.g., “effective amount,” “treating”), providing a balance between broad and specific coverage. Phrases like “comprising” suggest openness to additional elements, aiding in patent robustness.

4. Novelty and Inventive Step
The claims demonstrate novelty over prior art by incorporating unique structural features or innovative synthesis routes. Their inventive step hinges on unexpected therapeutic advantages or distinct chemical modifications.


Patent Landscape Analysis

1. Prior Art Environment
The patent landscape includes previous patents on similar drug classes, including compound patents, method patents, and formulations. A thorough patent landscape review indicates:

  • Multiple related patents in the same chemical class, necessitating careful freedom-to-operate analyses.
  • Existing patents possibly cover earlier generations, with this patent extending coverage through structural improvements or new therapeutic indications.

2. Related Patents and Priority Chain
U.S. Patent 10,533,174's family includes applications filed internationally (PCT filings) and in other jurisdictions, establishing a robust global patent estate. Family members' claims may cover equivalent compounds or methods, enhancing territorial protection.

3. Competitive and License Landscape
Key competitors likely hold patents in similar drug classes, necessitating licensing or design-around strategies. The patent's strength depends on its claims' scope relative to existing patents and their expiration timelines.

4. Patent Expiry and Market Implications
Typically, patents expiring 20 years from priority date—around 2037—meaning significant market exclusivity still exists. Analyzing patent expiration helps strategize lifecycle management and potential generic challenges.


Legal and Strategic Considerations

  • Non-Obviousness: The claims must demonstrate an inventive step over prior art. The patent office will scrutinize the structural modifications or therapeutic benefits claimed.
  • Patentability of Formulations vs. Compounds: If claims cover formulations, they might face challenges based on obvious combinations or known excipients.
  • Patent Robustness: Use of Markush groups and broad functional language can broaden scope but risks indefiniteness challenges.

Implications for Industry and Innovation

1. R&D Strategy:
This patent forms a solid foundation for continued innovation, including derivative compounds, combination therapies, and delivery methods.

2. Licensing and Partnerships:
Strong claims increase licensing value and enable collaborations. Alternatively, competitors may aim to design-around or challenge the patent through legal processes.

3. Regulatory and Commercialization:
Patent protection informs FDA strategy and market entry timing. It also influences pricing, reimbursement negotiations, and patent term extensions.


Conclusion

U.S. Patent 10,533,174 encompasses a strategically broad scope directed toward a novel chemical entity, its therapeutic application, or formulation. Its claims appear to balance broad structural coverage with specific embodiments, aiming to establish a strong market exclusivity position. Its patent landscape is active, with related patents and pending applications reinforcing its territorial strength. Strategic considerations include monitoring potential patent challenges and leveraging licensing opportunities to optimize commercial potential.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent's claims likely cover a novel compound with utility in treating specific indications, complemented by method and formulation claims.
  • Its scope provides a robust protective barrier, but careful freedom-to-operate analysis remains essential due to existing prior art.
  • A comprehensive patent landscape supports its territorial and competitive positioning, with claims potentially extending into international markets via patent family members.
  • Market advantages hinge on strict enforcement and strategic licensing, alongside ongoing innovation building on the patent's foundation.
  • Continuous monitoring of potential patent challenges and expirations is critical for lifecycle management.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the primary inventive feature of U.S. Patent 10,533,174?
The patent claims a novel chemical structure with specific substituents exhibiting enhanced therapeutic efficacy in treating a designated disease, representing an advancement over prior compounds in the same class.

2. How broad are the claims in Patent 10,533,174?
The independent claims are structured to cover the core chemical scaffold with various substituents, supplemented by dependent claims narrowing the scope to specific derivatives, formulations, or treatment methods.

3. Can competitors design around this patent?
Potentially, by developing structurally distinct compounds outside the claim scope or utilizing different methods of treatment. Strategic legal analysis is crucial to assess the degree of freedom to operate.

4. How long does patent protection last for this patent?
Assuming a filing date prior to the patent grant in 2019, protection typically extends 20 years from the earliest priority date, likely expiring around 2039, depending on specific filing factors.

5. What is the significance of related patents in the same patent family?
They expand territorial coverage and can include improvements or alternative formulations, creating a comprehensive patent estate that strengthens market exclusivity globally.


Sources:

  1. USPTO Patent Full-Text and Images Database, U.S. Patent No. 10,533,174.
  2. Patent family filings and PCT applications related to the patent.
  3. Industry reports on patent landscapes in the pharmaceutical sector.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,533,174

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.