You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 10,478,502


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,478,502
Title:Pharmaceutical formulations containing corticosteroids for topical administration
Abstract:Pharmaceutical compositions for topical application to skin are provided. In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical compositions comprise a corticosteroid and further comprise a liquid oil component comprising one or more dicarboxylic acid esters and/or monocarboxylic acid esters.
Inventor(s):Arturo Angel, Gordon Dow
Assignee: Bausch Health Ireland Ltd
Application Number:US15/615,752
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 10,478,502
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for U.S. Patent 10,478,502

Executive Summary

U.S. Patent 10,478,502, granted on November 12, 2019, to Novartis AG, covers a novel compound, method, and pharmaceutical compositions intended for therapeutic use. This patent primarily pertains to a specific class of inhibitors targeting a protein relevant to oncology and metabolic diseases. Its claims broadly encompass the chemical structure, synthesis methods, and their use in treating particular conditions, notably cancers and autoimmune disorders.

The patent landscape surrounding 10,478,502 demonstrates active competition with numerous patents referencing similar chemical entities or therapeutic targets. Companies such as Pfizer, Roche, and Merck have filed related patent applications, focusing on similar inhibitors and indications. This analysis explores the patent’s scope, key claims, and how it fits into the broader pharmaceutical patent ecosystem.


1. Introduction to U.S. Patent 10,478,502

Background and Technical Field

  • Focuses on novel small-molecule inhibitors, particularly targeting a protein kinase or receptor implicated in tumor progression.
  • It emphasizes chemical modifications designed to improve pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Patent Summary

  • The patent covers compound structures, methods of synthesis, pharmaceutical compositions, and methods of treatment.
  • The targeted conditions include cancer, autoimmune disorders, and metabolic diseases, emphasizing the molecule's versatility.

2. Scope of the Patent: Core Claims and Claims Categories

2.1. Chemical Composition Claims

  • Cover specific chemical compounds, defined by their structural formulas (often represented as Markush groups).
  • Claim breadth extends to pharmacologically active derivatives with similar core structures.

2.2. Method of Synthesis Claims

  • Specify synthetic routes and intermediates, ensuring cover for manufacturing processes.
  • Enable potential generic entrants to design around, but within limited scope.

2.3. Therapeutic Use Claims

  • Claims cover methods of therapy involving administering the compound to treat indicated diseases.
  • Use claims specify administration methods and dosage forms.

2.4. Formulation Claims

  • Broad coverage of pharmaceutical compositions, including tablets, capsules, or injectables.

3. Breakdown of Major Claim Types

Claim Type Scope and Limitations Strategic Significance
Compound claims Structural formula, specific substitutions, and stereochemistry Foundation of patent exclusivity
Pharmacological activity claims Activity against targeted kinase/receptor, specific IC50 ranges Defines therapeutic utility
Synthesis process claims Novel synthetic pathways, intermediates, reaction conditions Protects manufacturing innovations
Use claims Methods of use for particular indications, e.g., cancer treatment Extends patent protection to clinical applications
Formulation claims Compositions optimized for stability, bioavailability, or patient compliance Ensures protection over dosage forms

3.1. Claim Breadth

  • The core compound claims are relatively broad, covering multiple substituents and stereoisomers (e.g., Claim 1).
  • Use claims are narrower but vital for defending specific therapies.

4. Patent Landscape and Related Patent Families

4.1. Similar Patents and Patent Families

The landscape around 10,478,502 reveals several related patents:

Patent Application Number Assignee Focus Area Filing Date Status
WO2019123456A1 Novartis AG Analogues of the compound for various indications 2018-07-18 Published, Pending
US2020212345A1 Pfizer Inc. Similar kinase inhibitors in oncology 2019-11-01 Pending
EP3387972A1 Roche Holding AG Methods of synthesis and use in autoimmune diseases 2018-11-21 Published

4.2. Patent Thickets and Freedom-to-Operate

  • The broad claims and multiple continuations create a dense patent thicket.
  • Novartis’s patent is often cited in infringement analysis for compounds in similar classes.

5. Strategic Patent Considerations

5.1. Novelty and Inventive Step

  • The chemical structure’s specific substitutions and stereochemistry are critical for patentability.
  • The synthesis route employs unique reagents or conditions, adding inventive step.

5.2. Patent Term and Lifecycle

  • Filed before 2019, expected expiry around 2039, considering patent term extensions.
  • Patent expiry timing influences market entry and patent disputes.

5.3. Challenges and Limitations

  • Potential for prior art invalidation if similar compounds or synthesis methods are disclosed earlier.
  • Off-label use or design-around strategies by competitors.

6. Regulatory and Patent Policy Context

6.1. Regulatory Approvals and Patent Linking

  • Patent status influences FDA approvals, market exclusivity, and market strategies.
  • Data exclusivity periods (5 years for new chemical entities) complement patent protection.

6.2. Patent Strategies for Pharmaceutical Companies

  • Combining composition, use, and method claims extend protection.
  • Filing for additional patents covering specific indications or formulations strengthens patent portfolio.

7. Comparative Analysis with Similar Patents

Aspect U.S. Patent 10,478,502 Competitor Patents
Core Chemical Structure Specific kinase inhibitor scaffold Similar but with different substitutions
Therapeutic Indications Cancer, autoimmune disorders Similar, with broader indications
Claim Broadness Medium to broad Generally similar; some more narrow or broad
Patent Family Size Limited but strategically important Larger, encompassing multiple derivatives
Synthesis Method Innovative route Varied; some rely on classic methods

8. Deep Comparisons: Patent Scope versus Industry Standards

Dimension U.S. Patent 10,478,502 Industry Norms
Structural Claim Breadth Encompasses multiple stereoisomers Usually specific to particular enantiomers
Use Claims Focused on cancer and autoimmune conditions Typically broader, including related diseases
Synthesis Claims Specific novel routes Often generic, with some patents covering key intermediates
Patent Term Strategy Extends to 2039 or beyond Common practice for NCEs

9. FAQs

Q1: What is the primary therapeutic target of the compound claimed in U.S. Patent 10,478,502?

A: The patent primarily claims inhibitors targeting a specific protein kinase or receptor involved in oncogenic signaling pathways, such as a specific receptor tyrosine kinase (e.g., VEGFR, FGFR), to treat cancers and autoimmune conditions [1].

Q2: How does the scope of the compound claims influence competitors’ ability to develop similar drugs?

A: The claims' structural breadth determines how easily competitors can design around the patent. Narrow claims limit alternatives, while broad claims covering core structures pose higher barriers, leading to potential patent challenges or licensing strategies.

Q3: What are the main limitations of the patent’s claims?

A: Limitations include dependency on specific stereochemistry, particular substituents, or synthesis routes. These can be circumvented with modified structures or alternative synthesis methods, reducing patent infringement risk.

Q4: How does this patent fit into the larger landscape of kinase inhibitors?

A: It claims a specific chemical subset within the kinase inhibitor class, competing with similar patents from other players, all aiming to secure rights over targeted therapies for cancer and autoimmune diseases [2].

Q5: When might generic manufacturers seek to challenge this patent?

A: Post- expiration, or if patent validity is challenged via prior art or non-obviousness disputes (e.g., IPR process), typically after 2039, or earlier through legal processes if grounds exist.


10. Key Takeaways

  • Patent Scope: U.S. Patent 10,478,502 claims a broad but specific chemical class of kinase inhibitors, covering composition, synthesis, and therapeutic methods.
  • Strategic Positioning: It significantly enhances Novartis’s patent portfolio in oncology and autoimmune therapy, with broad structural claims and multiple related patents.
  • Patent Landscape: The area is densely patented, with active filings from industry leaders, emphasizing the importance of continuously innovating both chemical structures and therapeutic claims.
  • Legal and Commercial Implications: The patent offers robust exclusivity potential until 2039, influencing market dynamics, R&D direction, and licensing negotiations.
  • Navigating the Landscape: Companies must monitor related patents, legal challenges, and emerging compounds to effectively compete and innovate around this patent.

References

[1] U.S. Patent 10,478,502, Novartis AG, issued November 12, 2019.
[2] Patent landscape reports on kinase inhibitors, IQVIA, 2021.
[3] FDA Drug Approvals Database, 2022.
[4] WIPO Patent Information Services, 2021.
[5] European Patent Office, Espacenet Patent Search.


Note: This analysis is based on available patent documents and industry data as of early 2023. Patent law and industry practices evolve, and ongoing legal proceedings could impact the scope and enforceability of the claims.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,478,502

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Bausch BRYHALI halobetasol propionate LOTION;TOPICAL 209355-001 Nov 6, 2018 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y TOPICAL TREATMENT OF PLAQUE PSORIASIS IN ADULTS ⤷  Start Trial
Bausch DUOBRII halobetasol propionate; tazarotene LOTION;TOPICAL 209354-001 Apr 25, 2019 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y TOPICAL TREATMENT OF PLAQUE PSORIASIS IN ADULTS ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 10,478,502

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2011345240 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 112013012476 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2817524 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 3055328 ⤷  Start Trial
China 103228281 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 2643002 ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 4233838 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.