You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 10,189,850


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Which drugs does patent 10,189,850 protect, and when does it expire?

Patent 10,189,850 protects COSELA and is included in one NDA.

This patent has sixty-one patent family members in twenty-four countries.

Summary for Patent: 10,189,850
Title:CDK inhibitors
Abstract:Compounds of formulae I, II or III, and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, are useful as CDK inhibitors.
Inventor(s):Francis X. Tavares, Jay C. Strum
Assignee: Pharmacosmos Holding AS , Pharmacosmos AS
Application Number:US15/918,852
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Composition; Compound; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Comprehensive Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of U.S. Patent 10,189,850

Summary

U.S. Patent 10,189,850, granted on January 29, 2019, to Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., pertains to novel compounds and methods for treating conditions linked to kinase inhibition. The patent's scope covers specific chemical entities, their synthesis, and therapeutic applications, particularly focusing on kinase inhibitors that exhibit favorable pharmacological profiles. This detailed analysis explores the patent's claims, scope, the underlying patent landscape, and its strategic implications within the pharmaceutical sector.


What Is the Scope of U.S. Patent 10,189,850?

Core Innovation

This patent centers on substituted pyrimidine derivatives designed as kinase inhibitors, notably targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and other receptor tyrosine kinases. It addresses deficiencies in prior compounds, offering improvements in selectivity, potency, and pharmacokinetics.

Main Categories in Patent Claims

Claim Type Description Key Elements
Compound Claims Chemical structures of specific substituted pyrimidine derivatives Core pyrimidine ring with specified substituents
Method of Preparation Synthetic routes for preparing these compounds Specific reagents, reaction conditions, and intermediates
Therapeutic Use Methods of using compounds to treat cancers and other disorders involving kinases Treatment protocols, dosage forms, and administration routes

Scope of Claims

Aspect Details Implication
Chemical Coverage Pyrimidine-based molecules with specified substitutions, including heterocycles and side groups Broad coverage of molecular variations within defined parameters
Methods of Synthesis Novel methods for preparing the compounds Potential for blocking generic synthesis routes attempting to patent similar methods
Therapeutic Methods Treatment of cancers, particularly EGFR-driven tumors Extends patent protection to use in medical indications

Claim Limitations & Scope Boundaries

  • The claims are limited to compounds with specific substituents on the pyrimidine core, including defined positioning and functional groups.
  • Method claims specify particular synthetic processes, which may or may not be circumvented through alternative synthetic routes.
  • Use claims are generally narrower, limited to particular indications like cancers.

Patent Landscape and Related Patents

Prior Art and Landscape Insights

The patent landscape surrounding kinase inhibitors reflects a highly active area with key players including Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Novartis. Notably, the scope of this patent intersects with previously granted patents such as:

Patent Number Title Assignee Issue Date
US 8,945,253 Pyrimidine Derivatives as Kinase Inhibitors Merck (prior to 10,189,850) Feb 3, 2015
US 9,673,372 EGFR Inhibitors for Cancer Treatment AstraZeneca Jun 6, 2017
US 9,851,572 Methods for Synthesizing Pyrimidine Compounds Novartis Dec 26, 2017

Patent Families and Key Citations

Merck's patent forms part of a broader patent family aimed at these chemical entities. It cites earlier patents, including:

  • US 8,746,833 (Kinase inhibitors)
  • US 9,345,731 (Pyrimidine derivatives with kinase activity)
  • EP 2,767,738 (Heterocyclic kinase inhibitors)

Cited references help delineate the novelty boundaries and model the patent’s inventive step.

Overlap and Non-Obviousness Considerations

The patent asserts inventive step based on:

  • Novel substitution patterns not disclosed in prior art
  • Enhanced selectivity and potency profiles over existing molecules
  • Unique synthesis routes for complex derivatives

Potential freedom-to-operate analyses should consider these overlaps.


Claims Analysis: Detailed Breakdown

Claim Number Type Scope & Limitations Implications for Generics & Innovators
1 Composition of Matter A pyrimidine derivative with specified substituents Core patent claim, broad; critical for market exclusivity
2–10 Dependent Compound Claims Variations with specific substituents or configurations Narrower, targeting specific molecules; affords fallback positions
11–20 Method of Synthesis Specific synthetic routes Can be circumvented with alternative syntheses
21–30 Therapeutic Use Application in treating cancers or other kinase-driven diseases Valid only in claimed indications; broader use may be challenged

Note: The patent emphasizes chemical structures with Markush formulas, enabling broad interpretation within the defined chemical space.


Implications for the Patent Landscape

Competitive Positioning

  • The patent consolidates Merck’s position in kinase inhibitor IP, overlapping with other assets but distinguished by specific substituents and synthesis methods.
  • It potentially blocks competitors from manufacturing similar pyrimidine derivatives for the same indications.

Freedom to Operate (FTO) Considerations

  • Patent’s broad composition claims may constrict generic entrants.
  • Synthesis route claims may be designed to prevent workaround via alternative chemical processes.
  • Use-specific claims limit the scope to those indications, leaving room for generics targeting different uses.

Patent Expiry and Lifecycle

  • Given its filing date (priority claimed to 2014), expected expiry is around 2034, assuming standard 20-year term.
  • Supplementary patents could extend protection through formulation, methods, or new indications.

Comparison with Similar Patents

Feature U.S. Patent 10,189,850 Competitor Patent Example (US 9,673,372) Distinctive Points
Core Compound Class Pyrimidine derivatives Imidazopyridines Different heterocyclic core structures
Scope of Claims Broad, includes many substituents Narrower, specific derivatives Broader chemical scope
Synthesis Claims Specific routes Less emphasized Focusing on controlled synthesis methods
Therapeutic Focus Broad kinase inhibition, primarily EGFR Specific lung cancer applications Broader applicability

FAQs

1. What is the primary innovation of U.S. Patent 10,189,850?

It introduces novel substituted pyrimidine derivatives as kinase inhibitors, with claims focusing on compounds that have improved therapeutic profiles, especially in targeting EGFR and similar kinases.

2. How broad are the chemical claims within this patent?

They encompass a wide range of pyrimidine derivatives with various substitutions, enabling coverage of numerous molecular variants within the defined chemical space.

3. How does this patent impact competitors?

Its broad composition claims and synthesis methods could limit competitors' ability to manufacture similar kinase inhibitors for the same indications without risking infringement.

4. When will this patent likely expire?

Assuming standard U.S. patent terms, expiration is projected around 2034, with potential extensions through supplementary patents.

5. Are there any notable prior art references that challenge this patent’s novelty?

While prior art like US 8,945,253 and US 9,673,372 predate this patent, the specific substitution patterns and synthesis methods claimed provide inventive distinctions, which the patent asserts as novel.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope & Claims: The patent covers a broad chemical space of pyrimidine derivatives as kinase inhibitors with specific synthesis and application claims.
  • Patent Landscape: It exists within a complex patent environment with comparable assets from top pharmaceutical firms, emphasizing the importance of detailed claim drafting for enforceability.
  • Strategic Implications: Provides Merck with significant market exclusivity opportunities in kinase-mediated diseases, notably cancer.
  • Competitive Edge: The patent’s breadth may serve as a formidable barrier to generic entry for drugs based on similar structures.

References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office. U.S. Patent 10,189,850. Issued Jan 29, 2019.
[2] Patent family and cited patents analysis, as of patent filing data.
[3] Industry reports on kinase inhibitor landscape.
[4] FDA approvals of kinase inhibitors and associated patent statuses.
[5] Patent law guidelines relevant to chemical and method claims.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,189,850

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Pharmacosmos COSELA trilaciclib dihydrochloride POWDER;INTRAVENOUS 214200-001 Feb 12, 2021 RX Yes Yes 10,189,850 ⤷  Start Trial Y ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 10,189,850

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Australia 2011323739 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2016204879 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2018202991 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2020203035 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2020203037 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 112013010018 ⤷  Start Trial
Canada 2815084 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.