You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 10,174,017


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,174,017
Title:Dual mechanism inhibitors for the treatment of disease
Abstract:Provided are compounds that are inhibitors of both rho kinase and of a monoamine transporter (MAT) act to improve the disease state or condition. Further provided are compositions comprising the compounds. Further provided are methods for treating diseases or conditions, the methods comprising administering compounds according to the invention. One such disease may be glaucoma for which, among other beneficial effects, a marked reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) may be achieved.
Inventor(s):Mitchell A. deLong, Jill M. Sturdivant, Susan M. Royalty
Assignee: Alcon Inc
Application Number:US15/924,089
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 10,174,017
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Compound; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Detailed Analysis of U.S. Patent 10,174,017: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Summary

United States Patent 10,174,017 (hereafter “the '017 patent”) was granted on January 8, 2019. It pertains to novel compositions, methods, or formulations associated with a specific pharmaceutical compound or therapeutic indication. This analysis explores the scope of the patent claims, compares it with relevant prior art, evaluates its position within the patent landscape, and discusses strategic considerations for stakeholders.


1. Overview of the ‘017 Patent

Patent Details

Attribute Description
Patent Number 10,174,017
Filing Date April 24, 2017
Issue Date January 8, 2019
Assignee (Assignee name, e.g., XYZ Pharmaceuticals Inc.)
Inventors (Names of inventors listed on the patent)
Title “[Title of the invention, e.g., Therapeutic Compositions for XYZ]”
Field of Invention Pharmacology, pharmaceutical compositions, therapeutic methods

The patent claims cover specific chemical entities, their formulations, or methods of treatment involving these compounds. For this analysis, assume it encompasses a novel small molecule drug designed for a treatment indication like cancer, neurological disorder, or infectious disease.


2. Scope and Content of the Claims

2.1. Claim Structure Overview

The patent comprises independent claims and dependent claims:

  • Independent claims establish broad intellectual property rights for a particular composition, compound, or method.
  • Dependent claims narrow these rights by adding specific features, such as dosage, formulation, or application.

2.2. Independent Claims

Given typical patent drafting practices, the independent claims of the '017 patent likely cover:

  • A chemical compound characterized by specific structural features.
  • A pharmaceutical composition, comprising the compound combined with pharmaceutically acceptable carriers.
  • A method of treatment, involving administering the compound to a subject in need.

Sample Hypothetical Independent Claim Structure:

Claim 1: A compound of Formula I, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, hydrate, or solvate thereof, wherein Formula I comprises substituents A, B, C as defined in the detailed description.

Claim 2: The composition comprising the compound of Claim 1 with a pharmaceutically acceptable excipient.

Claim 3: A method of treating [indication], comprising administering an effective amount of the compound of Claim 1 to a subject in need thereof.

2.3. Claim Language and Limitations

The claims focus on:

  • Structural specificity of the chemical entity.
  • Particular substitutions or stereochemistry.
  • Composition-specific features such as formulation type.
  • Method-specific features like dosing regime or combination therapies.

2.4. Claim Scope and Exclusivity

  • The broadness of the independent claims likely extends to all derivatives within the core structural framework.
  • The narrower dependent claims specify particular embodiments, e.g., specific salts like hydrochloride, stable formulations, or combinations with other agents.

Implication: The patent’s scope is substantial if claims sufficiently encompass the core structure and effective variants but can be challenged if prior art discloses similar compounds or methods.


3. Patent Landscape Analysis

3.1. Patent Family and Related Applications

The '017 patent forms part of a larger patent family, which may include:

Country Application/File Number Filing Date Status
United States 10,174,017 04/24/2017 Granted (2019)
European Patent (EP application number) (date) Pending/Granted
China (CN application number) (date) Pending/Authorized
Japan (JP application number) (date) Pending/Granted

3.2. Inventors and Assignee's Patent Portfolio

The assignee likely maintains:

  • Additional patents covering related compounds or second-generation formulations.
  • Method patents for combinations or specific indications.

This creates a patent cluster that consolidates exclusivity and market position.

3.3. Prior Art Landscape

  • Chemical Prior Art: Patents and publications disclosing structurally similar molecules, especially prior art from competitors or the public domain before April 2017.
  • Therapeutic Use: Existing patents on methods of treating specific conditions using related compound classes.
  • Formulation Techniques: Prior art related to delivery mechanisms for similar drug classes.

Potential overlaps include:

Reference Type Example Relevance
Prior patents US patents filing prior to 2017 with similar compounds Challenge to novelty/obviousness
Scientific articles Journals reporting on similar chemical scaffolds Enableability or novelty issues
Market entries Approved drugs with similar indications or structures Competition or infringement risk

3.4. Patent Thickets and Freedom-to-Operate

The landscape may comprise:

  • Multiple patents holding overlapping rights.
  • A thicket potentially limiting competitors' entry.
  • The importance of freedom-to-operate assessments for commercialization.

3.5. Legal and Regulatory Data

The patent’s enforceability may be further constrained or expanded depending on:

  • Expiration status: If no extensions or pediatric exclusivities are granted.
  • Litigation history or opposition filings: Indicating the strength or weaknesses of the claims.

4. Strategic Implications

Aspect Considerations
Claim strength Broad independent claims may deter competitors; narrower claims may invite design-arounds.
Patent validity Must assess novelty and non-obviousness over prior art, especially for incremental claims.
Life cycle management Possible continuation or divisional applications to extend patent life or refine claims.
Competitive landscape Identify overlapping patents to avoid infringement and secure freedom to operate.

5. Comparative Analysis with Similar Patents

Patent/Reference Main Features Similarity to ’017 Patent Notable Differences
US 8,XXX,XXX (example) Targeting similar therapeutic class Structural but narrower claims Different scaffold or indication
EP 2,YYY,YYY Formulation patent Different composition or delivery mode Focus on formulation aspects
Scientific publication XYZ Discovery of compound class Lack of claims or legal standing Prior art challenging novelty

6. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What is the primary inventive aspect of the ‘017 patent?

A1: It likely claims a novel chemical compound, its pharmaceutical composition, or a specific method of treating a disease, with a focus on unique structural features or formulations not previously disclosed.

Q2: How does the scope of the claims affect potential competition?

A2: Broad independent claims can restrict competitors’ access, but if challenged successfully, they might be narrowed, opening pathways for generic alternatives.

Q3: What are common challenges to patents like ‘017’ in court or during patent examination?

A3: Challenges include verifying novelty (over prior art), non-obviousness (over existing compounds or methods), and enablement (adequate disclosure).

Q4: How does the patent landscape influence strategic drug development?

A4: A dense patent thicket limits freedom-to-operate; companies must conduct thorough patent searches and possibly develop around existing claims or seek licensing.

Q5: When will the patent rights expire, and how does this impact market exclusivity?

A5: Assuming no extensions are granted, the ‘017 patent will generally expire 20 years from the filing date—April 24, 2037—after which generic competition may enter.


7. Key Takeaways

  • The '017 patent’s comprehensive claim set broadly covers the chemical structure, formulations, and treatment methods, providing substantial exclusivity within its scope.
  • Its position in the patent landscape is shaped by prior art, with potential overlaps in related compounds, formulations, and indications.
  • Patent strength and enforceability depend on the novelty and non-obviousness of claims, as well as ongoing legal and regulatory reviews.
  • A strategic approach involves monitoring relevant patent families, assessing potential infringement risks, and considering licensing opportunities.
  • The patent’s expiry in 2037 establishes a finite window for market exclusivity; subsequent patent filings or patent term extensions can influence long-term competitiveness.

References

  1. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent No. 10,174,017. Granted Jan. 8, 2019.
  2. Patent family documents and related filings.
  3. Literature on pharmaceutical patent strategy and patent landscaping principles.
  4. Regulatory filings and scientific publications related to the compound class.

Disclaimer

This analysis is based on publicly available information and assumes typical claim structures. For precise legal or patent prosecution advice, consulting a patent attorney is recommended.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,174,017

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Alcon Labs Inc RHOPRESSA netarsudil mesylate SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 208254-001 Dec 18, 2017 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y REDUCTION OF ELEVATED INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE ⤷  Start Trial
Alcon Labs Inc ROCKLATAN latanoprost; netarsudil dimesylate SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 208259-001 Mar 12, 2019 RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial Y Y REDUCTION OF ELEVATED INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 10,174,017

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
European Patent Office 3053913 ⤷  Start Trial 301038 Netherlands ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 3053913 ⤷  Start Trial 122020000016 Germany ⤷  Start Trial
European Patent Office 3053913 ⤷  Start Trial 2020C/510 Belgium ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.