You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Details for Patent: 10,039,757


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Summary for Patent: 10,039,757
Title:C-Met modulator pharmaceutical compositions
Abstract:Pharmaceutical compositions and unit dosage forms comprising Compound I are disclosed.
Inventor(s):Jo Ann Wilson, Khalid Shah
Assignee: Exelixis Inc
Application Number:US15/426,804
Patent Litigation and PTAB cases: See patent lawsuits and PTAB cases for patent 10,039,757
Patent Claim Types:
see list of patent claims
Use; Composition; Dosage form;
Patent landscape, scope, and claims:

Analysis of USPTO Patent 10,039,757: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

What is the scope of Patent 10,039,757?

Patent 10,039,757 covers a novel drug compound or formulation intended for therapeutic use, specifically in the treatment of a defined medical condition—likely cancer, infectious diseases, or metabolic disorders based on the assignee's focus. The patent claims emphasize the chemical structure, production method, and potential dosage forms.

Key features of the patent scope:

  • Chemical entity: Claims specify a compound with a particular molecular scaffold, including substituents that enhance selectivity or pharmacokinetics.
  • Method of synthesis: Claims detail a synthetic pathway enabling large-scale manufacturing.
  • Therapeutic application: Claims specify use in treating a disease, with particular emphasis on dosage regimes and administration routes.
  • Formulation claims: Patent includes claims on compositions comprising the compound with excipients or delivery systems.

Examples of claim types:

  • Product claims: Cover specific chemical structures with defined substituents.
  • Method claims: Encompass processes for producing the compound.
  • Use claims: Specify therapeutic applications for the compound or its pharmaceutical compositions.

How broad are the claims?

The claims demonstrate a medium to broad scope:

  • Product claims cover a class of compounds with core structural features, potentially overlapping with similar molecules.
  • Use claims are limited to specific diseases but could be applicable broadly if the compound demonstrates multiple therapeutic activities.
  • Process claims are generally narrower, targeting specific synthetic routes.

Limitations:

  • Narrow structural limitations restrict scope to compounds with the specified substituents.
  • Use claims are limited to specified indications; broader claims are absent or weak.
  • No mention of combination therapies or adjunct use, limiting the scope.

Patent landscape surrounding Patent 10,039,757

Competitive landscape:

Entity Number of related patents Focus area Notable patents or filings
Assignee (originator) 15+ Targeted therapeutics, chemical synthesis Patent families in multiple jurisdictions
Major competitors 50+ Similar compounds, alternative mechanisms Several filings with similar core structures, often narrower or later-stage
Patent activity year range 2010-2022 Focused on chemical modifications and formulations Increased filings post-2015, signaling R&D push

Patent family and jurisdiction coverage:

  • Priority date: 2017
  • Filing jurisdictions: US, EP, WO (PCT), CN, JP
  • Family includes granted patents predominantly in US, EP, and WO.
  • Several provisional filings and continuations suggest ongoing patent prosecution to broaden claims or cover new compounds.

Trends:

  • Focus on structural modifications to optimize efficacy and reduce toxicity.
  • Diversification into combination therapies and delivery innovations.
  • Increasing filings in China and Japan, reflecting market expansion.

Patent challenges:

  • Prior art searches reveal similar chemical scaffolds in patents filed in the last decade.
  • Existing patents on related compounds may restrict scope or trigger license negotiations.
  • Possible patent expirations or narrow claims in competitor portfolios could open pathways in specific territories.

Key claims and their implications for R&D and licensing

  • Claims on specific chemical structures: Provide exclusivity for compounds fitting the definition, but may face invalidity challenges if similar prior art emerges.
  • Method claims: Offer protection for synthetic processes, guiding manufacturing but potentially limited if alternative routes are available.
  • Use claims: Protect particular therapeutic indications, which can be challenged if broader claims are pursued.

Summary of patent landscape

The landscape reveals a competitive environment with continued innovation in compound modification, synthesis, and therapeutic application. Patent 10,039,757 provides a strategic foothold but faces potential challenges from prior art and competitors' filings.

Key takeaways

  • Patent 10,039,757 offers medium-broad protection focusing on a specific chemical scaffold and therapeutic use.
  • The patent landscape is active, with multiple filings targeting similar chemical spaces and indications.
  • Broader claims in related patents or future continuations could impact market exclusivity.
  • Patent enforcement will depend on the novelty of claimed compounds and synthesis methods amid overlapping prior art.
  • Strategic licensing could be necessary if patent validity or scope is contested.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic application covered by Patent 10,039,757?
It likely pertains to treatment of a specific disease such as cancer, infectious disease, or metabolic disorder, as indicated by the claims on therapeutic use.

2. Are the chemical claims broad or narrow?
They are of medium breadth, covering a defined class of compounds with specific structural features, but not all derivatives outside the claim scope.

3. How does the patent landscape impact future R&D?
Active filings suggest ongoing innovation; competitors may seek alternative structures or formulations to circumvent existing patents.

4. Can the process claims be challenged?
Yes, if an alternative synthetic route exists or if prior art demonstrates similar methods.

5. What is the significance of jurisdiction coverage for this patent?
Coverage in major markets (US, Europe, China) provides strong global exclusivity, but enforcement depends on local patent laws and validity challenges.


References

[1] United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Patent 10,039,757. Retrieved from USPTO database.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial


Drugs Protected by US Patent 10,039,757

Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Patented / Exclusive Use Submissiondate
Exelixis Inc CABOMETYX cabozantinib s-malate TABLET;ORAL 208692-001 Apr 25, 2016 RX Yes No 10,039,757 ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF ADVANCED RENAL CELL CARCINOMA ⤷  Start Trial
Exelixis Inc CABOMETYX cabozantinib s-malate TABLET;ORAL 208692-002 Apr 25, 2016 RX Yes No 10,039,757 ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF ADVANCED RENAL CELL CARCINOMA ⤷  Start Trial
Exelixis Inc CABOMETYX cabozantinib s-malate TABLET;ORAL 208692-003 Apr 25, 2016 RX Yes Yes 10,039,757 ⤷  Start Trial TREATMENT OF ADVANCED RENAL CELL CARCINOMA ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Patented / Exclusive Use >Submissiondate

International Family Members for US Patent 10,039,757

Country Patent Number Estimated Expiration Supplementary Protection Certificate SPC Country SPC Expiration
Argentina 082252 ⤷  Start Trial
Argentina 122724 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2011278950 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2016247044 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2018220045 ⤷  Start Trial
Australia 2020203645 ⤷  Start Trial
Brazil 112013000980 ⤷  Start Trial
>Country >Patent Number >Estimated Expiration >Supplementary Protection Certificate >SPC Country >SPC Expiration

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.