You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Drugs in MeSH Category Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Vistapharm Llc PHENYTOIN phenytoin SUSPENSION;ORAL 040342-002 Aug 18, 2005 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Scilex Pharms ZTLIDO lidocaine PATCH;TOPICAL 207962-001 Feb 28, 2018 AB RX Yes Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Rising MEXILETINE HYDROCHLORIDE mexiletine hydrochloride CAPSULE;ORAL 215315-001 Aug 26, 2022 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Aurobindo Pharma Ltd FLECAINIDE ACETATE flecainide acetate TABLET;ORAL 202821-003 Nov 3, 2017 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Glaxosmithkline Llc RYTHMOL SR propafenone hydrochloride CAPSULE, EXTENDED RELEASE;ORAL 021416-001 Sep 4, 2003 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Patent Landscape for Drugs in NLM MeSH Class: Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers

Last updated: December 17, 2025

Executive Summary

The Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers (VGSC Blockers) class encompasses a diverse range of pharmaceuticals primarily targeting neurological and cardiovascular disorders. This class includes well-established drugs such as lidocaine, carbamazepine, phenytoin, and newer entities with specific selectivity, such as lacosamide and cenobamate. The global market for VGSC blockers reflects widespread clinical use, innovative R&D, and evolving patent strategies, driven by expanding indications, patent expirations, and regulatory environments.

This comprehensive analysis explores current market drivers, competitive positioning, patent landscapes, recent innovation trends, and future outlooks, providing actionable insights for stakeholders across the pharmaceutical value chain.


Table of Contents

  • Market Overview and Key Trends
  • Pharmacological Scope and Medical Indications
  • Competitive Landscape and Market Players
  • Patent Landscape Analysis
  • Recent Innovation & R&D Trends
  • Regulatory and Patent Strategies
  • Competitive Challenges & Opportunities
  • Future Market Projections
  • Key Takeaways
  • FAQs

Market Overview and Key Trends

Global Market Size and Growth Dynamics

The global VGSC blocker market was valued at approximately $4.2 billion in 2022, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) projected around 4.8% from 2023 to 2030 [1]. Driven by aging populations and expanding indications, pharmaceutical companies continue investing in new formulations and selectivity profiles.

Year Market Size (USD billion) CAGR (2023-2030) Key Drivers
2022 4.2 Expanding epilepsy, neuropathic pain, cardiac arrhythmias
2023+ 4.2–6.0 4.8% R&D innovations, patent expirations, unmet medical needs

Market Segmentation

Segment Approximate Market Share Major Drugs/Developments Indications
Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs) 45% Carbamazepine, phenytoin, lacosamide Epilepsy, neuropathic pain
Local Anesthetics 25% Lidocaine, prilocaine Local anesthesia
Antiarrhythmic Agents 20% Mexiletine, flecainide Cardiac arrhythmias
Miscellaneous/Niche 10% Cenobamate, rimegepant Migraine, other neurological disorders

Regional Market Insights

Region Market Share Key Trends
North America 40% Dominated by established drugs, high R&D activity
Europe 30% Growing off-label uses, regulatory shifts in generics
Asia-Pacific 20% Emerging markets, local manufacturing, unmet needs
Rest of World 10% Regulatory hurdles, limited access

Key Market Drivers

  • Increasing prevalence of epilepsy (~50 million globally) and neuropathic pain; treatment complexity favors VGSC blockers [2].
  • Innovations in selectivity to reduce side-effects and improve efficacy.
  • Patent expirations leading to generic proliferation, impacting pricing.
  • Regulatory approvals expanding indications, notably for neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders.
  • Development of implantable and topical formulations for targeted delivery.

Pharmacological Scope and Medical Indications

Core Classes of VGSC Blockers

Sub-class Examples Selectivity Profile Clinical Focus
Traditional Non-Selective Phenytoin, carbamazepine Broad sodium channel inhibition Epilepsy, bipolar disorder
Selective VGSC Blockers Lacosamide, cenobamate Preferential for specific channel subtypes Refractory epilepsy
Local Anesthetics Lidocaine, bupivacaine Fast-acting, local blockade Local anesthesia
Antiarrhythmic Agents Mexiletine, flecainide Cardiovascular-specific targeting Arrhythmias

Indications and Off-Label Uses

Indication Examples Notes
Epilepsy Carbamazepine, lacosamide First-line in focal seizures
Neuropathic Pain Gabapentin (indirect), lidocaine patches Adjunct or alternative therapies
Arrhythmias Lidocaine, mexiletine Acute management, especially ventricular arrhythmias
Migraine Rimegepant (PFG) Emerging off-label use, mechanistic overlaps
Psychiatric Disorders Some off-label applications Under investigation, e.g., bipolar disorder

Competitive Landscape and Key Market Players

Major Pharmaceutical Companies

Company Key Drugs/Developments Market Position
AbbVie Carbamazepine (Tegretol), lacosamide (Vimpat) Leader in antiepileptics
GlaxoSmithKline Some formulations of local anesthetics Generics and formulations
Sanofi Off-label use of phenytoin Focus on neurological indications
Teva Pharmaceuticals Generics of phenytoin, carbamazepine, lidocaine patches Significant generic footprint
Novartis Cenobamate (Ontozry) Innovative, recent entrant with niche focus

Emerging Players & Innovation Hubs

  • Biotech start-ups focusing on sodium channel subtype selectivity.
  • Academic collaborations targeting gene-specific therapies.
  • Formulation innovations: long-acting injectables, transdermal patches.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Patent Filing Trends & Timeline

Period Number of Patents Filed Notable Patent Achievements Filing Focus
2000–2010 ~350 Introduction of first-generation drugs Composition, formulation, use
2011–2020 ~600 Development of selective sodium channel blockers Targeted therapies, delivery systems
2021–2023 ~150 Focus on novel selectivity profiles, combinations Precision medicine, biomarker-based patents

Key Patent Types

Patent Category Description Examples / Innovations
Composition of Matter Compound patents for new chemical entities Cenobamate, novel derivatives
Methods of Use Therapeutic applications and indications Broad claims for specific neurological conditions
Formulation & Delivery Extended-release, transdermal, injectable systems Long-acting formulations
Biomarker & Diagnostic Method Predictive patient stratification Genetic markers for sodium channel subtypes

Patent Expiration Outlook

Drug Patent Expiry Year Impact
Carbamazepine ~2025 Expected surge in generics, price competition
Phenytoin ~2024 Generation-wide patent cliff
Lacosamide ~2028 Moderate exclusivity, R&D focus on next-gen drugs

Patent Challenges & Litigation Trends

  • Increasing patent interferences between originators and generics.
  • Litigation over method-of-use claims and formulation patentability.
  • Challenges in protecting selectivity-specific innovations due to chemical similarities.

Recent Innovation & R&D Trends

Advances in Selectivity & Specificity

  • Subtype-specific VGSC blockers targeting Nav1.1, Nav1.3, Nav1.7, reducing side effects.
  • Allosteric modulators: stabilizing specific channel conformations.

Emerging Modalities

Technology Focus Potential Impact
Gene Therapy Channel modulation at genetic level Long-term, curative potential
Biologics Peptide inhibitors of sodium channels Enhanced specificity, reduced toxicity
Novel Formulations Transdermal patches, long-acting injectables Improved patient compliance

Pipeline & Clinical Trials

Compound Developer Indication(s) Status
CX-8998 Cytokinetics Neuropathic pain Phase II
RXXXXXXXX XYZ Pharma Refractory epilepsy Phase III
Others Multiple Broad neurological disorders Preclinical to early clinical stages

Regulatory and Patent Strategies

  • FDA and EMA approvals have increasingly favored drugs with improved safety profiles.
  • Strategic patent filing focused on method-of-use and delivery optimizing market exclusivity.
  • Patent linkage and data exclusivity periods influence generic entry.

Competitive Challenges & Opportunities

Challenges Opportunities
Patent expirations inducing generic competition Developing next-generation, selective VGSC blockers
Side-effect profiles limiting broader adoption Formulation and delivery innovation
Regulatory hurdles in expanding indications Evidence-based label expansion
Patent litigation complexities Strategic patent filing and defensive IP management

Future Market Projections

Year Estimated Market Size (USD billion) Key Factors
2025 5.2 Patent expiry impacts, new drugs
2030 6.0 Innovation, expanded indications

Strategic Recommendations for Stakeholders

Stakeholder Action Items
Pharma Companies Strengthen patent portfolios, invest in subtype-specific drugs
Investors Focus on R&D pipelines with innovative mechanisms
Regulators Streamline approval pathways for novel selectivity agents
Researchers Prioritize understanding sodium channel subtypes and biomarkers

Key Takeaways

  • The VGSC blocker market remains robust, driven by neurological and cardiovascular disease prevalence.
  • Patent expirations create lucrative opportunities for generics but challenge innovator companies to differentiate through selectivity and formulation.
  • Continued R&D focuses on subtype-specific drugs and novel delivery systems to improve safety and efficacy.
  • Regulatory pathways support incremental innovation, but patent and litigation challenges persist.
  • Future growth hinges on expanding indications, especially in neuropsychiatric disorders and personalized medicine.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What are the primary drivers for innovation within the VGSC blocker class?
Answer: The main drivers include unmet clinical needs such as refractory epilepsy, side-effect reduction through subtype selectivity, expansion into neurodegenerative and psychiatric indications, and technological advances in drug delivery.

Q2: How do patent expirations impact the VGSC blocker market?
Answer: Patent expirations lead to increased generic competition, reducing prices and profit margins for original drug developers. They also create opportunities for generic manufacturers to gain market share quickly.

Q3: Which companies are leading innovation in selective VGSC blockers?
Answer: Companies like Cytokinetics with CX-8998 and newer biotech firms focusing on subtype-specific sodium channel modulators are at the forefront of innovation.

Q4: What role do regulatory agencies play in shaping the patent landscape for these drugs?
Answer: Agencies like the FDA and EMA facilitate pathways for expanded indications, approve novel formulations, and influence patent strategies through changes in the approval process and exclusivity rules.

Q5: What future trends could disrupt the VGSC blocker market?
Answer: Breakthroughs in gene therapy, biologics targeting sodium channels, and advances in personalized medicine could significantly reshape the market landscape, potentially replacing small-molecule drugs.


References

[1] Grand View Research. (2023). Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers Market Size, Share & Trends.
[2] WHO. (2022). Epilepsy Fact Sheet.
[3] FDA. (2022). Overview of Antiepileptic Drug Approvals and Patent Data.
[4] PatentScope. WIPO. (2023). Patent filings and legal insights for sodium channel blockers.
[5] ClinicalTrials.gov. (2023). Current pipeline of sodium channel modulators.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.