You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 12, 2025

Drugs in MeSH Category Potassium Channel Blockers


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Dr Reddys AMIODARONE HYDROCHLORIDE amiodarone hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 076163-001 Sep 5, 2003 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Baxter Hlthcare NEXTERONE amiodarone hydrochloride INJECTABLE;INJECTION 022325-003 Nov 16, 2010 RX Yes Yes 7,635,773 ⤷  Get Started Free Y ⤷  Get Started Free
Zydus Pharms Usa Inc AMIODARONE HYDROCHLORIDE amiodarone hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 079029-003 Jan 6, 2023 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Rubicon Research AMIODARONE HYDROCHLORIDE amiodarone hydrochloride TABLET;ORAL 078578-003 Feb 26, 2021 AB RX No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Patent Landscape for Drugs in NLM MeSH Class: Potassium Channel Blockers

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

Potassium channel blockers constitute a significant subclass within the realm of ion channel modulators, impacting various therapeutic areas, notably cardiovascular, neurological, and oncological disorders. These agents modulate potassium channels—integral membrane proteins facilitating potassium ion flux—thereby influencing cellular excitability, repolarization, and signaling pathways. An in-depth analysis of market dynamics combined with an examination of the patent landscape provides strategic insights for pharmaceutical R&D, investment, and competitive positioning.

Market Overview and Key Therapeutic Areas

The global market for potassium channel blockers is driven by their clinical utility across diverse indications:

  • Cardiovascular disorders: Used for arrhythmias and hypertension control, exemplified by agents like amiodarone and ibutilide.
  • Neurological diseases: Targeted in epilepsy and multiple sclerosis (MS), with drugs like 4-aminopyridine (fampridine) improving conduction.
  • Oncology: Emerging applications in tumor proliferation and angiogenesis modulation, although fewer agents are currently approved.
  • Other indications: Such as autoimmune diseases and metabolic syndromes.

The overall market size is projected to expand at a notable compound annual growth rate (CAGR), driven by innovation, unmet medical needs, and emerging therapeutic paradigms [1].

Market Drivers and Barriers

Drivers

  • Advancements in understanding ion channel pharmacology: Enhanced knowledge has led to more selective agents, reducing side effects.
  • Unmet clinical needs: Particularly in neurological disorders; for example, long-standing use of 4-aminopyridine in MS.
  • Regulatory incentives and approvals: Accelerating pathways for drugs targeting rare or innovative indications.
  • Emerging onco-neurological applications: Growing evidence of potassium channels in cancer pathology expands market prospects.

Barriers

  • Safety and toxicity concerns: Given that potassium channels are ubiquitous, off-target effects pose challenges.
  • Competitive landscape: Multiple agents with similar mechanisms create pressure on pricing and patent exclusivities.
  • Limited pipeline diversity: Overreliance on a few well-established drugs diminishes incremental market growth.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Patent Strategies and Lifecycles

Patent filings for potassium channel blockers predominantly cover:

  • Compound patents: Novel chemical entities with specific selectivity profiles.
  • Use patents: New therapeutic indications or formulations.
  • Method-of-use patents: Specific dosing regimens or combination therapies.
  • Process patents: Manufacturing innovations.

Patent life cycles follow standard trajectories, with filings peaking approximately 10–15 years after initial discovery, and expirations typically occurring 20 years from filing date. This landscape is dynamic, with strategic filings extending market exclusivity.

Key Patent Holders and Token Innovations

Prominent patent holders include big pharma entities such as Merck, Pfizer, and Novartis, alongside emerging biotechs innovating on selectivity and delivery mechanisms. For example:

  • Enhanced selectivity: Patents on compounds targeting specific potassium channel subtypes (e.g., Kv1.1, Kv7) to minimize off-target effects.
  • Novel formulations: Long-acting or targeted delivery systems to improve efficacy and adherence.
  • Combination therapy patents: Synergy with existing cardiovascular or neurological drugs.

Patent Challenges and Litigation

Patent challenges often focus on obviousness, novelty, or prior art overlaps. Litigation activities revolve around:

  • Defending granted claims for chemical structure innovations.
  • Nullifying generic or biosimilar filings post-patent expiration.
  • Inter-partes reviews initiated in jurisdictions like the US Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).

Patent Expirations and Market Entry

Expiring patents mark significant shifts, enabling generic or biosimilar drug proliferation. Strategic lifecycle management includes patent extensions, supplemental protections, and new use patents to maximize revenue streams until the next wave of innovation.

Emerging Trends and Innovation Hotspots

  • Subtype-specific blockers: Focused on Kv7 and Kv10 channels, linked to epilepsy and oncology.
  • Allosteric modulators: Offering improved selectivity and safety profiles.
  • Gene therapy and biologics: Exploring modulation of potassium channels at the genetic level.
  • Computational drug design: Accelerating discovery and patent filings for novel agents.

Implications for Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical companies must balance innovation with strategic patent filings, considering lifecycle extension approaches.
  • Investors should monitor patent expiration timelines, emerging patent filings, and novel mechanisms.
  • Regulators increasingly scrutinize compound specificity and safety, influencing patent claims and approval pathways.

Conclusion

The potassium channel blocker landscape is characterized by robust developmental activity, strategic patent filing, and evolving therapeutic applications. The market benefits from ongoing innovation, yet faces challenges from patent expirations, safety concerns, and competitive pressures. A nuanced understanding of patent strategies—covering compound, use, and process patents—is essential for navigating this complex landscape.


Key Takeaways

  • The market for potassium channel blockers is expanding, driven by neurology, cardiology, and emerging oncological therapies.
  • Patent strategies emphasize chemical novelty, selective targeting, and new indications, with lifecycle management critical for sustained competitiveness.
  • Patent expirations create opportunities for generics, but companies are leveraging narrow and continuation patents to extend exclusivity.
  • Innovation hotspots include subtype-selective agents, allosteric modulators, and combination therapies.
  • Monitoring patent landscapes and litigation trends informs strategic R&D and investment decisions.

FAQs

1. How does patent exclusivity impact the availability of potassium channel blockers?
Patent exclusivity allows innovators to commercially benefit from their investments, delaying generic entry. Expires patents open markets to biosimilars or generics, increasing accessibility and affecting pricing.

2. What are the primary therapeutic indications driving innovation in potassium channel blockers?
Neurological conditions such as multiple sclerosis and epilepsy, cardiovascular arrhythmias, and emerging oncology applications remain key drivers of R&D efforts.

3. Are there notable recent patent filings in this class?
Yes. Companies are filing patents on subtype-specific potassium channel blockers, novel formulations, and combination therapies to maintain competitive advantage [2].

4. How do safety concerns influence patent strategy in this field?
Safety profiles influence patent claims—selectivity and targeted delivery patents emerge to address toxicity issues associated with broad-spectrum agents.

5. What is the outlook for the next five years in this landscape?
Innovation in subtype-specific modulation, gene editing techniques, and biologics will likely shape market growth, alongside strategic patent extensions to sustain market presence.


References
[1] Market research reports on ion channel modulators.
[2] Recent patent filings and intellectual property analyses (public patent databases).

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.