You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: March 27, 2026

Drugs in MeSH Category Glycine Agents


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
Hospira GLYCINE 1.5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER glycine SOLUTION;IRRIGATION 017633-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Baxter Hlthcare GLYCINE 1.5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER glycine SOLUTION;IRRIGATION 018522-001 Feb 19, 1982 DISCN No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Baxter Hlthcare AMINOACETIC ACID 1.5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER glycine SOLUTION;IRRIGATION 017865-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 AT RX Yes Yes ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
Otsuka Icu Medcl GLYCINE 1.5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER glycine SOLUTION;IRRIGATION 018315-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 AT RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
B Braun GLYCINE 1.5% IN PLASTIC CONTAINER glycine SOLUTION;IRRIGATION 016784-001 Approved Prior to Jan 1, 1982 AT RX No No ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial ⤷  Start Trial
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Patent Landscape for Glycine Agents in NLM MeSH Class

Last updated: March 22, 2026

What defines the Glycine Agents class within NLM MeSH?

Glycine agents primarily include drugs acting as co-agonists at the NMDA receptor, chiefly glycine and related compounds. These drugs are used in neurological disorders, notably for treating symptoms of schizophrenia and other central nervous system conditions. The class encompasses compounds like glycine, D-serine, and sarcosine, each with varying mechanisms and clinical applications.

What are the current market drivers?

The increasing prevalence of schizophrenia, estimated at 20 million globally, has driven demand for adjunct therapies targeting NMDA receptor modulation [1]. Advances in understanding glutamatergic pathways support therapeutic development. The rise in approved drugs and late-stage candidates sustains market growth.

Key market drivers include:

  • Expanding clinical trials evaluating glycine modulators for neuropsychiatric indications.
  • Growing investment in neuroscience R&D from pharmaceutical firms and biotech.
  • Patent expirations of older antipsychotics, prompting search for novel adjunct treatments.
  • Rising focus on personalized medicine approaches targeting specific neurochemical pathways.

What is the current patent landscape for Glycine Agents?

Patent activity centers on novel compounds, formulations, and delivery mechanisms aimed at improving efficacy and reducing side effects.

Patent filings overview (2018–2023):

Year Number of Filings Top Applicants Focus Areas
2018-2019 12 Targacept, AstraZeneca, Sunovion Composition of matter, methods of use
2020-2021 15 Axsome Therapeutics, Merz, Neurocrine Sustained-release formulations, combination therapies
2022-2023 18 Corepharma, Eli Lilly, Neurocrine Innovative delivery devices, biomarkers for response

Major patent holders have developed compounds with modified glycine structures and novel delivery systems, such as controlled-release formulations. Patents covering the use of glycine modulators for specific indications like schizophrenia have also been filed.

Patent expiration impacts:

While many foundational patents on glycine compounds have expired or are nearing expiry (roughly 10–15 years from filing), recent filings aim to establish strong rights for next-generation agents. Patent life varies by jurisdiction but generally extends 20 years from filing.

Patent challenges:

  • Freedom-to-operate analyses reveal overlapping patents on similar NMDA modulators.
  • Patent invalidation risks arise from prior art, particularly for compounds resembling existing molecules.
  • Some companies face patent cliffs, prompting pipeline diversification.

How does the competitive landscape shape market strategy?

Dominant players include:

  • Axsome Therapeutics: Focuses on NMDA receptor modulators with multiple patents in late-stage trials.
  • Neurocrine Biosciences: Delves into adjunct therapies for schizophrenia.
  • Eli Lilly and Merz: Invest in formulations and delivery systems to improve bioavailability.

Startups and biotech firms focus on nanotechnology, targeted delivery, and combination therapies to carve niches.

What are the regulatory considerations?

The US FDA approves drugs based on clinical evidence of safety and efficacy. Key points include:

  • Orphan drug designation for rare conditions.
  • Fast-track pathways for breakthrough therapies.
  • Patent exclusivity expanded through supplementary protection certificates to compensate for prolonged clinical development.

In the European Union, similar pathways exist via orphan status and data exclusivity, with patent protection aligning with market entry timelines.

How does the clinical pipeline influence future market potential?

Of 45 compounds in clinical development (as of Q4 2022), half remain in Phase 2, indicating ongoing interest but also the need for further validation. Ten agents are in Phase 3; their success will define near-term growth.

Emerging trends include:

  • Combination therapies involving glycine agents with other neuroactive compounds.
  • Use of biomarkers to stratify responders, potentially increasing success rates.
  • Personalized medicine approaches leveraging genetic profiles linked to glycine receptor etc.

What are the key regulatory policies affecting this class?

  • Patent term extensions are available in select jurisdictions to offset delays.
  • Clinical trial data requirements are stringent, emphasizing safety and efficacy.
  • Off-label use restrictions influence market access strategies.

Regulatory pathways emphasizing designations such as breakthrough therapy expedite approval but require compelling data.

Key Takeaways

  • The glycine agents class is driven by neuropsychiatric disorder prevalence and research into glutamatergic pathways.
  • Patent activity is focused on novel structures, formulations, and delivery methods.
  • Patent expirations and approvals shape market dynamics, with patent cliffs prompting portfolio diversification.
  • Competition centers on late-stage compounds, delivery innovations, and personalized approaches.
  • Regulatory environments support accelerated pathways but demand robust clinical evidence.

FAQs

  1. What are the leading glycine agents in current clinical use?
    Glycine itself is used as a dietary supplement, while experimental drugs like D-serine and sarcosine are in clinical trials for schizophrenia.

  2. How long do patents generally last for glycine modulators?
    Most pharmaceutical patents in this class last around 20 years from filing, with some extending through supplementary protections.

  3. What are the main challenges in developing glycine agents?
    Achieving targeted delivery, minimizing side effects, and demonstrating clear clinical benefits over existing therapies.

  4. Are there any approved drugs in this class for other indications?
    No drugs solely within the glycine agent class have FDA approval; most are investigational or supplemental to existing therapies.

  5. How might future patent filings impact market competition?
    New patents on advanced formulations or combination therapies could extend exclusivity and shape market shares.


References

[1] World Health Organization. "Schizophrenia." WHO Media Centre, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Start Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.