You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Drugs in MeSH Category Anti-Asthmatic Agents


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Applicant Tradename Generic Name Dosage NDA Approval Date TE Type RLD RS Patent No. Patent Expiration Product Substance Delist Req. Exclusivity Expiration
King Pharms Llc TILADE nedocromil sodium AEROSOL, METERED;INHALATION 019660-001 Dec 30, 1992 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
King Pharms Llc INTAL cromolyn sodium AEROSOL, METERED;INHALATION 018887-001 Dec 5, 1985 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Bausch And Lomb CROMOLYN SODIUM cromolyn sodium SPRAY, METERED;NASAL 075702-001 Jul 3, 2001 OTC No Yes ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
King Pharms Llc INTAL cromolyn sodium SOLUTION;INHALATION 018596-001 May 28, 1982 DISCN Yes No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Sanofi Aventis Us TILADE nedocromil sodium SOLUTION;INHALATION 020750-001 Oct 1, 1997 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Bausch And Lomb CROLOM cromolyn sodium SOLUTION/DROPS;OPHTHALMIC 074443-001 Jan 30, 1995 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
Eugia Pharma CROMOLYN SODIUM cromolyn sodium SOLUTION;INHALATION 074209-001 Apr 26, 1994 DISCN No No ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free ⤷  Get Started Free
>Applicant >Tradename >Generic Name >Dosage >NDA >Approval Date >TE >Type >RLD >RS >Patent No. >Patent Expiration >Product >Substance >Delist Req. >Exclusivity Expiration

Market Dynamics and Patent Landscape for Drugs in NLM MeSH Class: Anti-Asthmatic Agents

Last updated: August 2, 2025


Introduction

The anti-asthmatic agents classified under the National Library of Medicine’s Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) exhibit a dynamic commercial and innovation landscape. With asthma affecting an estimated 262 million people globally, the therapeutic market is both sizable and rapidly evolving, driven by advances in pharmacotherapy, regulatory shifts, and demographic trends. Understanding the market dynamics, along with a comprehensive review of patent activity, provides vital insights for industry stakeholders seeking strategic positioning in this competitive field.


Market Overview

Global Market Size and Growth Trends

The global anti-asthmatic drugs market was valued at approximately USD 45 billion in 2022, with projections estimating a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 5% through 2030.[1] The primary drivers include rising asthma prevalence, particularly in urbanized regions, increased awareness, and expanding access to healthcare. Additionally, improved diagnosis rates and the development of targeted therapies have bolstered market expansion.

Key Therapeutic Segments and Innovations

Anti-asthmatic agents are broadly categorized into:

  • Beta-agonists: Short-acting (SABAs) and long-acting (LABAs) bronchodilators.
  • Corticosteroids: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) remain frontline therapy.
  • Leukotriene Modifiers: For mild-to-moderate cases.
  • Biologic Agents: Monoclonal antibodies such as omalizumab, mepolizumab, and benralizumab, covering severe eosinophilic asthma.

Recent innovations in biologics have revolutionized treatment, offering targeted, personalized options for refractory cases, fueling premium segment growth.

Market Challenges

Despite positive trajectories, challenges persist, including:

  • Generic Competition: Patent expirations leading to price erosion.
  • Safety Concerns: Long-term safety profiles of biologics.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Stringent approval processes for complex biologics.
  • Patient Adherence: limitations due to inhaler technique and treatment complexity.

Patent Landscape Analysis

Patent Filing Trends

Patent activity within the anti-asthmatic class reflects a strategic emphasis on biologics and novel delivery mechanisms:

  • Peak Patent Filings (2015-2018): Corresponding to breakthroughs in monoclonal antibody therapies and inhaler device innovations.[2]
  • Decreased Filings Post-2018: Possibly due to patent expirations of earlier biologics and shifting focus toward biosimilars.

Major Patent Holders

  • GlaxoSmithKline (GSK): Pioneering in inhaler device patents and biologics such as mepolizumab.
  • Novartis: Focused on limb-specific biologics and advanced inhaler technologies.
  • Regeneron/ Sanofi: Co-developing biologic therapies targeting severe asthma.

Notably, patent filings are increasingly directed toward formulation innovations, device ergonomics, and biosimilar versions.

Patent Expiration and Generic/Biosimilar Entry

Key biologics like omalizumab (~2016 patent expiration) have seen biosimilars enter the market, escalating competition.[3] This trend pressures innovator companies to foreground next-generation molecules and delivery systems to sustain market share.

Legal and Regulatory Landscape

Patent applications in this class often face challenges regarding:

  • Patent Term Extensions: To compensate for regulatory delays.
  • Patent Thickets: Multiple overlapping patents complicating biosimilar development.
  • Evergreening Strategies: Minor modifications allowing extended patent protection, occasionally attracting legal scrutiny.

Market Dynamics: Competitive Strategies and Future Trajectories

Innovation Focus

  • Biologics and Biosimilars: Shaping future growth, with pipeline products targeting eosinophilic and allergic asthma.
  • Combination Therapies: Patent filings increasingly explore fixed-dose combinations to improve adherence.

Regulatory Environment

Global regulatory agencies are encouraging the entry of biosimilars to increase affordability while maintaining safety standards, influencing patent strategies and litigation.

Emerging Technologies

  • Digital Inhaler Devices: Integration of IoT for adherence monitoring, offering patent opportunities.
  • Gene and Cell Therapies: Early-stage research could revolutionize treatment paradigms and patent filings in the longer term.

Key Patent Filings and Patent Expirations

The landscape reveals a shifting focus from first-generation biologics to next-generation molecules and delivery systems. For example:

  • Omalizumab: Patent expirations in mid-2010s spurred biosimilar development.
  • Mepolizumab and Reslizumab: Still under patent protection, with expiration anticipated in the coming decade, suggesting upcoming generics/biosimilars.

Patent exclusivity for biologics typically lasts 12-14 years from filing, yet strategies such as method-of-use patents extend commercial protection.


Implications for Industry Stakeholders

  • Pharmaceutical Companies: Must innovate beyond patents to maintain competitive advantage, emphasizing biosimilars, combination therapies, and delivery technology.
  • Investors: Should monitor patent expiry timelines and pipeline robustness to anticipate market shifts.
  • Regulators: Mandate transparent, robust patent proceedings, fostering innovation while preventing evergreening abuses.

Conclusion

The anti-asthmatic agent market exemplifies a nuanced interplay of mature therapies, innovative biologics, and patent strategies. While pivotal patents of first-generation biologics expire or approach expiration, rapid advancement in biosimilars, delivery devices, and targeted therapies sustains robust growth. Key to future success is strategic patenting in novel formulations and biologic innovations, alongside navigating complex legal landscapes and regulatory pathways.


Key Takeaways

  • The global anti-asthmatic market remains lucrative, driven by biologics and personalized therapies.
  • Patent expiration of blockbuster biologics catalyzes biosimilar and biobetter development.
  • Innovation in drug delivery and combination therapies presents critical patent opportunities.
  • Patent thickets and evergreening strategies require vigilant legal and strategic management.
  • Stakeholders must adapt rapidly to technological and regulatory shifts to sustain competitive advantage.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. How does patent expiration impact the anti-asthmatic drug market?
Patent expirations open the market to biosimilars and generics, increasing competition, reducing prices, and potentially expanding access but challenging original innovators’ market share.

2. What are the dominant patent strategies in this class?
Innovators pursue patents on novel biologic molecules, delivery devices, formulations, and methods of use. Patent extensions and secondary filings protect subsequent innovations and new use cases.

3. Are biosimilars as effective as original biologic therapies?
Yes, approved biosimilars demonstrate comparable efficacy, safety, and quality. Their entry fosters competition and affordability without compromising therapeutic outcomes.

4. What role does innovation in drug delivery play in this landscape?
Enhanced inhaler devices with digital monitoring and registries are patented to improve adherence, safety, and provide competitive differentiation.

5. How will emerging therapies affect the patent landscape?
Gene editing, cell therapy, and precision medicine paradigms could lead to new patent filings, potentially disrupting existing markets and extending the innovation horizon.


References

[1] MarketWatch. (2022). Global Asthma Drugs Market Size, Share & Trends.
[2] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Filings Statistics, 2015–2022.
[3] U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Biosimilar Achievements and Patent Expiry Timeline.


This comprehensive analysis aids industry professionals in understanding current patent activities and market trends in anti-asthmatic therapies, supporting strategic decision-making.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.