Litigation Details for Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2016)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2016)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2016-06-21 |
| Court | District Court, N.D. California | Date Terminated | 2018-01-05 |
| Cause | 15:1126 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | William Haskell Alsup |
| Jury Demand | Both | Referred To | |
| Parties | CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.; MATTHEW BORDEN; STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC. | ||
| Patents | 10,001,469; 10,011,857; 10,022,424; 10,232,003; 10,232,004; 10,232,010; 10,232,015; 10,232,225; 10,285,920; 10,442,806; 10,450,365; 10,557,121; 6,027,469; 6,469,030; 6,857,351; 7,018,806; 7,226,900; 7,244,753; 7,244,857; 7,351,701; 7,696,232; 7,704,753; 8,007,806; 8,017,557; 8,017,758; 8,019,551; 8,226,505; 8,232,053; 8,334,010; 8,551,091; 8,556,753; 8,557,244; 8,557,285; 8,557,551; 8,557,730; 8,557,806; 8,559,007; 8,562,564; 8,696,696; 8,704,007; 8,753,701; 9,011,411; 9,012,469; 9,095,559; 9,334,469; 9,505,701; 9,551,009; 9,730,900 | ||
| Attorneys | Adam Hoffman; Andrew D. Weiss; Benjamin T. Wang; Brian David Ledahl; David Carl Dotson; Elise Sabrina Edlin; Jacob Robert Buczko; Jeffrey Zhi Yang Liao; Jennifer M Przybylski; Jeremy J Taylor; John M. Desmarais; Jordan Malz; Justin P.D. Wilcox; Lauren Jarvis Dreyer; Lauren May Eaton; Marc Aaron Fenster; Matthew Brooks Borden; Michael P. Stadnick; Neil Alan Rubin; Paul Anthony Kroeger; Sarah JoAnn Guske; Shackire Oneil Anderson; Steven Marc Balcof; Thomas Chisman Martin; Wayne O. Stacy | ||
| Firms | Baker Botts L.L.P.; Baker Botts LLP; BraunHagey & Borden LLP; Desmarais LLP; Duane Morris LLP; Perkins Coie LLP; Russ August & Kabat; Shackire Oneil Anderson; Zhong Lun Law Firm LLP | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Biologic Drugs cited in Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2016)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-19 | 244 | Order | Apple and Cisco, United States Patent Nos. 6,009,469 (“the ’469 patent”), 6,108,704 … 10 the time it is sought.” Id. at 1028. 11 Patent owner… 10 invalidity defense than either patent owner’s infringement analysis… 10 This order affords that factual finding deference, and patent owner specifies… This post-merits patent suit has devolved into a protracted fee dispute — “one of the least | External link to document |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
