Litigation Details for STATE OF WISCONSIN v. INDIVIOR INC. (E.D. Pa. 2016)

STATE OF WISCONSIN v. INDIVIOR INC. (E.D. Pa. 2016)

Docket		Date Filed	2016-09-22
Court	District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania	Date Terminated
Cause	15:1 Antitrust Litigation	Assigned To	Mitchell S. Goldberg
Jury Demand	None	Referred To
Patents	8,017,150; 8,475,832; 8,603,514
Link to Docket	External link to docket

Details for STATE OF WISCONSIN v. INDIVIOR INC. (E.D. Pa. 2016)

Date Filed	Document No.	Description	Snippet	Link To Document
2017-09-08	204		2008, MonoSol applied for a patent, which was issued as patent number 8,017,150 entitled “Polyethylene Oxide-Based…subject to any patent protection. (Id.) In 1994, and in lieu of exclusivity through patent protection, … (Id. ¶ 51.) Indivior listed the ‘150 patent, as well as patent numbers 8,475,8325 and 8,603,514 in the…in July 2013 to avoid the end of patent exclusivity, or the “patent cliff.” Id. at 647–48. …reformulation was not an attempt to avoid a “patent cliff”—the end of patent exclusivity corresponding to the brand	External link to document
2017-09-28	210		that MonoSol applied for patent 8,017,150, and that FDA listed this patent in the “Orange Book.” … not claim that this product was protected by patents covering the two active ingredients. As to the …Indivior admits that FDA listed the three specified patents in the Orange Book. As to the allegations regarding	External link to document
2017-10-30	219		2008, MonoSol applied for a patent, which was issued as patent number 8,017,150 entitled “Polyethylene Oxide-Based…subject to any patent protection. (Id.) In 1994, and in lieu of exclusivity through patent protection, the… (Id. ¶ 51.) Indivior listed the ‘150 patent, as well as patent numbers 8,475,832 and 8,603,514 in the…the patent”). In all of these cases, the alleged antitrust conduct involved the use of the patent by …allowing companies to avoid the patent claim, extend the patent life cycle for products, and	External link to document