Litigation Details for SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC v. FRESENIUS KABI USA, LLC (D.N.J. 2014)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC v. FRESENIUS KABI USA, LLC (D.N.J. 2014)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2014-12-16 |
| Court | District Court, D. New Jersey | Date Terminated | 2018-03-04 |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Michael Andre Shipp |
| Jury Demand | None | Referred To | Lois H. Goodman |
| Parties | BELCHER PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC | ||
| Patents | 7,241,907; 8,927,592 | ||
| Attorneys | JEFFREY S. SOOS | ||
| Firms | Christina Lynn Saveriano | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC v. FRESENIUS KABI USA, LLC
The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC v. FRESENIUS KABI USA, LLC (D.N.J. 2014)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-12-16 | 1 | expiration of U.S Patent Nos. 5,847,170 (“’170 patent”) and 7,241,907 (“’907 patent”) throughout the United… 25. United States Patent No. 7,241,907 (the “’907 patent,” copy attached as Exhibit B) … INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,241,907 38. Plaintiffs repeat… 23. United States Patent No. 5,847,170 (the “’170 patent,” copy attached as Exhibit A) …United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) on December 8, 1998. The ’170 patent claims, | External link to document | |
| 2015-03-17 | 11 | U.S. Patent No. 5,847,170 (“the ‘170 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 7,241,907 (“the ‘907 patent”). … ALLEGED INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,241,907 38. Fresenius incorporates…Invalidity of the ’170 patent) 47. Each and every claim of the ’170 patent is invalid for failure…Invalidity of the ’907 patent) 49. Each and every claim of the ’907 patent is invalid for failure…certifications with respect to the patents-in-suit, alleging that the ’170 and ’907 patents are invalid, unenforceable | External link to document | |
| 2016-09-22 | 115 | Plaintiffs’ patents: U.S. Patent No. 7,241,907 (filed Dec. 18, 2014) (the “‘907 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. …construction of the disputed terms in the ‘592 Patent and the ‘907 Patent. Case 3:14-cv-O7869-|\/|AS-LHG Document…Decl.”), Ex. 2 (“‘907r Patent”), ECF No. 57-7; Kiley Decl., Ex. 3 (“‘592 Patent), ECF No. 57-8.) The parties…dispute the meanings of the terms of the ‘907 Patent and ‘592 Patent for Jevtana. (Joint Claim Construction …solvate” in the ‘907 Patent and the meanings of the following terms in the ‘592 Patent: “a method for treating | External link to document | |
| 2016-09-22 | 116 | claims in two of Plaintiffs' patents: US Patent No. 7,241,907 and US Patent No. 8,927,592. Signed by Judge…2014 5 March 2018 3:14-cv-07869 830 Patent None District Court, D. New Jersey | External link to document | |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
