Litigation Details for Oyster Optics, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2018)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Oyster Optics, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2018)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2018-11-08 |
| Court | District Court, E.D. Texas | Date Terminated | 2018-11-08 |
| Cause | 28:1331 Fed. Question | Assigned To | James Rodney Gilstrap |
| Jury Demand | Defendant | Referred To | |
| Parties | CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.; OYSTER OPTICS, LLC | ||
| Patents | 10,036,037; 8,003,353; 8,008,032; 8,445,003; 8,445,013; 8,716,001; 9,018,017; 9,024,034; 9,782,479 | ||
| Attorneys | Adam S Hoffman; Alice E Snedeker; Andrea Leigh Fair; Claire Abernathy Henry; Eric Hugh Findlay; Jacob Buczko; John Matthew Baird; John R Gibson; Joseph Andrew Powers; Louis Norwood Jameson; Marc A Fenster; Matthew Christopher Gaudet; Michael J Sacksteder; Neil Alan Rubin; Paul Anthony Kroeger; Reza Mirzaie; Roger Brian Craft; Theresa M Troupson; Thomas John Ward , Jr | ||
| Firms | Duane Morris Atlanta; Duane Morris LLP; Duane Morris LLP Washington; FENWICK & WEST, LLP - San Francisco; Findlay Craft PC; Russ August & Kabat - Los Angeles; Ward, Smith & Hill, PLLC | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Oyster Optics, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Biologic Drugs cited in Oyster Optics, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for Oyster Optics, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2018)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-02 | 11 | Sealed Motion | Gibson, # 34 Exhibit 1, # 35 Exhibit 2, # 36 Exhibit 3, # 37 Plaintiff's SurReply to MTE the Testimony…2018 8 November 2018 2:18-cv-00479 830 Patent Defendant District Court, E.D. Texas…Exhibit 6, # 9 Exhibit 7, # 10 Exhibit 8, # 11 Exhibit 9, # 12 Exhibit 10, # 13 Exhibit 11, # 14 Exhibit…Exhibit 7, # 27 Exhibit 8, # 28 Exhibit 9, # 29 Exhibit 10, # 30 Exhibit 11, # 31 Exhibit 12, # 32 Cisco's Reply | External link to document |
| 2020-06-02 | 13 | Sealed Motion | Inc. 8 November 2018 8 November 2018 2:18-cv-00479 830 Patent Defendant …Judgment as to NI of the Titano 1 and 2 Products (Dkt. 353), # 13 Text of Proposed Order Order denying Motion…17 Exhibit 3, # 18 Exhibit 4, # 19 Exhibit 5, # 20 Exhibit 6, # 21 Exhibit 7, # 22 Exhibit 8, # 23 Exhibit… Exhibit A, # 6 Exhibit B, # 7 Exhibit C, # 8 Exhibit D, # 9 Exhibit E, # 10 Exhibit F, # 11 Exhibit G… 2 Products, # 2 Declaration of Theodor Kupfer, # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4 Declaratin of Alice Snedeker, # 5 Exhibit | External link to document |
| 2020-06-02 | 14 | Sealed Motion | Plaintiff's Damages Expert (Stephen E. Dell) (Dkt. 716), # 8 Text of Proposed Order Order denying Motion to…Inc. 8 November 2018 8 November 2018 2:18-cv-00479 830 Patent Defendant …Dkt. 648) by Cisco Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Order granting Motion to Strike…Plaintiff's Damages Expert (Stephen E. Dell), # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 | External link to document |
| 2020-06-02 | 15 | Sealed Motion | November 2018 8 November 2018 2:18-cv-00479 830 Patent Defendant District Court, E.D… (Dkt. 782), # 5 Declaration of Reza Mirzaie, # 6 Exhibit A, # 7 Exhibit B, # 8 Exhibit C, # 9 Exhibit | External link to document |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
