Litigation Details for Nalco Company v. Wisconsin Power and Light Company (W.D. Wis. 2018)

Nalco Company v. Wisconsin Power and Light Company (W.D. Wis. 2018)

Docket		Date Filed	2018-04-18
Court	District Court, W.D. Wisconsin	Date Terminated
Cause	35:271 Patent Infringement	Assigned To	James Donald Peterson
Jury Demand	Both	Referred To	Stephen L. Crocker
Patents	8,013,002; 9,217,020
Link to Docket	External link to docket

Details for Nalco Company v. Wisconsin Power and Light Company (W.D. Wis. 2018)

Date Filed	Document No.	Description	Snippet	Link To Document
2019-06-17	175	Redacted Document	removed. D.I. # 35-1, ʼ692 Patent at 1:29-46, 2:8-13; 2:16-22. Pl. Response: Undisputed….S. Patent No. 7,507,083; U.S. Patent No. 7,674,442; U.S. Patent No. 7,758,827; U.S. Patent No.7,776,301….S. Patent No. 7,955,577; U.S. Patent No. 7,988,939; U.S. Patent No. 8,114,368; U.S. Patent No.….S. Patent No. 8,226,913; U.S. Patent No. 8,313,323; U.S. Patent No. 8,501,128; U.S. Patent No.….S. Patent No. 8,574,324; U.S. Patent No. 8,658,115; U.S. Patent No. 8,703,081; U.S. Patent No.	External link to document
2019-06-17	177	Redacted Document	. D.I. # 135, Pl. Opp. Br. 203‒09, 217‒20. That the ’692 Patent is not limited to coal-fired power… and the patent owner’s own statement defining “flue gas” in the context of the ’692 Patent (“Accordingly…sentence in the patent that it cites; (iii) contradicted by the plain text of the patent itself; and (iv…his ’282 Patent, which issued in 1998. See D.I. # 135, Pl. Opp. Br. 90– 91. But the ’282 Patent described…Ex. 52, ’282 Patent at 1:8‒11 (emphasis added). Other statements in that patent are consistent	External link to document