DrugPatentWatch Database Preview
Litigation Details for NOVARTIS AG v. ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC. USA (D.C. 2011)
» See Plans and Pricing
NOVARTIS AG v. ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC. USA (D.C. 2011)
| Docket | Start Trial | Date Filed | 2011-09-09 |
| Court | District Court, District of Columbia | Date Terminated | 2012-12-10 |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Emmet G. Sullivan |
| Jury Demand | None | Referred To | |
| Parties | ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC. USA; INTAS PHARMACEUTICAL LTD.; NOVARTIS AG; NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION | ||
| Patents | 6,025,391; 6,172,107; 6,306,900 | ||
| Attorneys | Edmund J. Haughey , III; Raja N. Saliba | ||
| Firms | Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto; Raja N. Saliba | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in NOVARTIS AG v. ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC. USA
The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is Start Trial .
Details for NOVARTIS AG v. ACCORD HEALTHCARE, INC. USA (D.C. 2011)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-09-09 | 1 | United States Letters Patent No. 6,025,391 (“the ‘391 patent”). The ‘391 patent was duly and legally …United States Letters Patent No. 6,172,107 (“the ‘107 patent”). The ‘107 patent was duly and legally …United States Letters Patent No. 6,306,900 (“the ‘900 patent”). The ‘900 patent was duly and legally …of the ‘391 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 16. The ‘391 patent claims, inter…of the ‘107 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 19. The ‘107 patent claims, inter | External link to document | |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
