Litigation Details for In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation (N.D. Cal. 2014)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation (N.D. Cal. 2014)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2014-04-03 |
| Court | District Court, N.D. California | Date Terminated | 2018-09-20 |
| Cause | 28:1331 Fed. Question | Assigned To | William Horsley Orrick III |
| Jury Demand | Plaintiff | Referred To | Joseph Spero |
| Patents | 7,897,050 | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Biologic Drugs cited in In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
The biologic drug covered by the patent cited in this case is ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation (N.D. Cal. 2014)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-31 | 1032 | Declaration in Support | 11.70 $675 $ 7,897.50 20 Matthew Van Tine Attorney… summarized expert 11 reports, analyzed patents and patent expert reports, and was a member of the document… case 14 and Teikoku’s outside counsel in the patent litigation that resulted in the alleged reverse… involved in the settlement negotiations in the patent suit) 10 and adjudicating the proposed designations… 16 admissibility of pleadings in Defendants’ patent litigation in support of Plaintiffs’ opposition | External link to document |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
