DrugPatentWatch Database Preview
Litigation Details for In re: '318 Patent Infringement Litigation (D. Del. 2005)
Try a free trial
See Plans and Pricing
In re: '318 Patent Infringement Litigation (D. Del. 2005)
| Docket | Try a Free Trial | Date Filed | 2005-06-03 |
| Court | District Court, D. Delaware | Date Terminated | 2008-08-28 |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | |
| Jury Demand | Referred To | ||
| Patents | 3,950,333; 4,599,353; 4,602,017; 4,631,286; 4,837,223; 4,943,639; 5,001,153; 5,053,407; 5,061,722; 5,407,688; 5,527,814; 5,698,226; 5,889,052; 5,908,850; 6,099,863; 6,358,527; 6,673,337; 9,180,095; 9,327,033 | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in In re: '318 Patent Infringement Litigation
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , Try a Free Trial , and Try a Free Trial .
Biologic Drugs cited in In re: '318 Patent Infringement Litigation
The biologic drug covered by the patents cited in this case is Try a Free Trial .
Details for In re: '318 Patent Infringement Litigation (D. Del. 2005)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-02-10 | 103 | Letter | who hold rights in United States Patent No. 5,908,850 (“the 850 patent”), against Teva, a generic drug …of a patented drug was considered patent infringement This was so even if such use of the patented drug…relevant patents. Accordingly, companies seeking to market generic drugs upon the expiration of patents that…seeks approval to market a patented product before the expiration of the patent. The purpose of this provision… that practices the 850 patent They allege that Teva infringed the 850 patent by filing an ANDA and an | External link to document |
| 2006-02-21 | 104 | Notice to Take Deposition | quot;), the owner'of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,099,863 (“the '863 patent") and 6,358,527 ("the…best of its knowledge U.S. Patent No. 6,099,863 ("the '863 patent") is invalid, unenforceable… BARR'$ ANDA Certlj?carion ihat U.S. Patent No. 6,099,863 is Invalld, Unenjbrceable, and/or Will Nor…#39;187 parent application"; now U.S. Patent No. 6,099,863), which entered National Stage in the United…ficaiion Regrrrding the '3]8 Patent _ A. The '318 Patent The ‘318 patent issued to Bonnie Davis on | External link to document |
| 2006-02-21 | 106 | Notice to Take Deposition | .S. Patent Nos. 6,099,863 (“the '863 patent") and 6,358,527 ("the '527 patent“), according… BARR'$ ANDA Cert!fica!ion that U.S. Patent No. 6,099,863 is Invalid, Unenjbrceable, and/or WIH Nar…#39;187 parent application"; now U.S. Patent No. 6,099,863), which entered National Stage in the United…ion Regarding the '318 Patent _ A. The '318 Patent The ‘31 8 patent issued to Bonnie Dayis on…catlon Regardiug the '863 Patent A. The '863 Patent The '863 patent issued to Pa\rl Marie Victor | External link to document |
| 2006-02-21 | 109 | Notice to Take Deposition | Cerrificarious for U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,663,318, 6,099,8§3 and 6,358,527 Dcar Sirs: _l°urepac Phannaceutical Co. (“Purcpae…. As used herein, “the- ‘3 1 8 patent” shall mean United States Patent No. 4,663,3 l 8. 5. As used herein… that the claims of the ‘318 patent, the ‘863 patcm, and the ‘52-7 patent are invalid and/or will not …` Ternis in a patent claim can be defined only in a way that comports With the patent as a whole. Markm…of the ‘318 patent are invalid and/or not infringed A. The ‘3 18 l’atent The ‘3 18 patent is generally | External link to document |
| 2006-02-21 | 111 | Notice to Take Deposition | "), 6,099,863 (“tlte ‘863 patent), and 6,3$3,527 (“the ‘527 patent"). Those patents were listed… the claims of the '318 patent. the ‘863 patent. and the ‘52-7 patent are invalid and/or will not …527 patents are not infringed A. The ‘863 and ‘527 Pat-sots The ‘863 patent and the ‘527 patent are … 4. As used herein, “the ‘318 patent” shall mean United States Patent No. 4,663,318. 5. As used herein… ` Terms in s patent claim can be defined only in a way that comports with the patent as a whole Morkman | External link to document |
| 2006-02-21 | 112 | Notice to Take Deposition | respect to U.S. Patent Nos. 4,663,318 (“the ‘318 patent"). 6.099.863 (“the ‘863 patent”), and 6,358,…methods of administration II. U.S. PATENT NO. 6,099,863 The ‘863 patent, entitled "Past_Dissolving …IV certiiication with respect to U.S. Patents 4,663,318, 6,099,863 and 6,358,527 (the “L:isted Patcnts”… Factual And Legal Bases That U.S. Patent Nos. 4,663,318, 6,099,863 and 6,358,527 Ane Invalid, Unenforceable…Factual And Legal Bases That U.S. Patent N'os. 4,663,318, 6,099,863 and 6,358,527 Are lnvalld, - Unenforceuble | External link to document |
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
