Litigation Details for Fogg Filler Company v. Closure Systems International, Inc. (W.D. Mich. 2015)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Fogg Filler Company v. Closure Systems International, Inc. (W.D. Mich. 2015)
Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2015-07-13 |
Court | District Court, W.D. Michigan | Date Terminated | |
Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | |
Jury Demand | Referred To | ||
Patents | 10,627,414; 6,941,899; 7,799,897; 7,946,251; 8,287,897; 8,940,735; 8,946,251; 9,603,799; 9,603,931; 9,941,931 | ||
Link to Docket | External link to docket |
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Fogg Filler Company v. Closure Systems International, Inc.
Biologic Drugs cited in Fogg Filler Company v. Closure Systems International, Inc.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for Fogg Filler Company v. Closure Systems International, Inc. (W.D. Mich. 2015)
Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-04-14 | 124 | Opinion | Flex-Chuck infringes claims 1-5 and 7-10 of the ‘046 patent. Accordingly, the Court will grant Plaintiff…product directly infringe claims 1-5 and 7-10 of the ‘046 patent. Defendant disagrees. The parties…the Flex-Chuck infringe claims 1-5 and 7-10 of the ‘046 patent. Accordingly, the Court will grant Plaintiff…material fact. Jakubowski v. Christ Hosp., Inc., 627 F.3d 195, 200 (6th Cir. 2010). The burden then “shifts…Smith v. Erie Cty. Sheriff’s Dep’t, 603 F. App’x 414, 418 (6th Cir. 2015) (quoting Tysinger v. Police | External link to document |
>Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |