DrugPatentWatch Database Preview
Litigation Details for Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Grunenthal GbmH v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., and Barr Laboratories, Inc. (S.D.N.Y. 2012)
Email this page to a colleague
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Grunenthal GbmH v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., and Barr Laboratories, Inc. (S.D.N.Y. 2012)
| Docket | ⤷ Try it Free | Date Filed | 2012-11-05 |
| Court | District Court, S.D. New York | Date Terminated | |
| Cause | 35:145 Civil Action to Obtain Patent | Assigned To | Thomas Poole Griesa |
| Jury Demand | None | Referred To | Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Go |
| Patents | 6,096,339; 6,294,195; 6,309,663; 6,340,475; 6,488,963; 6,562,375; 6,635,280; 6,699,503; 6,723,340; 6,733,783; 7,776,314; 7,851,482; 8,075,872; 8,114,383; 8,192,722; 8,309,122; 8,329,216 | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Grunenthal GbmH v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., and Barr Laboratories, Inc.
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , and ⤷ Try it Free .
Biologic Drugs cited in Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Grunenthal GbmH v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., and Barr Laboratories, Inc.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , ⤷ Try it Free , and ⤷ Try it Free .
Details for Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Grunenthal GbmH v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., and Barr Laboratories, Inc. (S.D.N.Y. 2012)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-11-05 | 1 | 6,009,690 A 1/2000 nomng 6,077,538 A 6/2000 Merrill 6,096,339 A SIZUC)U Aycrcla.l. 6,117,4$3 A 9/2000 Set]:leta…5,968,925 6,001,391 6,009,390 6,009,690 6,077,533 6,096,339 6,1 17,453 6.120.802 6,133,241 6,228,363 6,235,825…482 Patent would constitute infringement of the patent COUNT II: INFRINGEMENT OF THE ’383 PATENT …383 Patent would constitute infringement of the patent COUNT III: lNFRINGEMENT OF THE ’722 PATENT 58…United States Patent (10_) Patent N_o.: US 8,192,722 BZ Arkenau-Maric et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Jun. 5, | External link to document | |
| 2015-03-17 | 117 | States Patent Number 8,114,383. Summary judgment is denied with regard to United States patent numbers…November 2012 1:12-cv-08060-TPG-GWG Patent None District Court, S.D. New | External link to document | |
| 2015-03-17 | 148 | Compare Claim 9, U.S. Patent No. 8,114,383 B2 with Claim 8, U.S. Patent No. 8,114,383 B2. Plaintiffs… three of the six patents in suit, U.S. Patent Numbers 8,114,383 (“the ’383 Patent”), 8,309,060 (“the…of the patents asserted in that case was United States Patent Number 8,114,383. Id. That patent, the ’…States Patent Number 8,114,383. Summary judgment is denied with regard to United States patent numbers…States Patent Number 8,114,383. Summary judgment is denied with regard to United States patent numbers | External link to document | |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
