Litigation Details for Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. 10X Genomics, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2020)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. 10X Genomics, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2020)
Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2020-05-11 |
Court | District Court, N.D. California | Date Terminated | |
Cause | 28:1331 Fed. Question | Assigned To | Susan Van Keulen |
Jury Demand | Both | Referred To | |
Parties | 10X GENOMICS, INC.; BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC.; PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE | ||
Patents | 10,011,798; 10,023,854; 10,028,940; 10,065,919; 10,076,555; 10,286,004; 10,286,029; 10,286,071; 10,286,072; 6,087,555; 6,703,064; 7,074,401; 7,260,062; 7,919,115; 8,075,919; 8,277,830; 8,287,940; 8,288,085; 8,802,079; 8,802,099; 8,802,103; 9,060,940; 9,084,802; 9,089,555; 9,555,064; 9,555,112; 9,650,444; 9,703,102; 9,802,012; 9,919,024; 9,919,025; 9,919,061 | ||
Attorneys | Aaron M. Nathan; Azra M. Hadzimehmedovic; Brian Chang; Brian J. Wall; Daniel M. Radke; David S. Godkin; Derek C. Walter; Edward Reines; Eric S. Hochstadt; Garland Stephens; Geoffrey Raux; James E. Kruzer; James L. Messenger; Jennifer K. Robinson; Katherine Nicole Clouse; Katrina C. Rogachevsky; Kenneth Reinker; Leah Brannon; Matthew D. Powers; Matthew Douglas Powers; Michael J. Tuteur; Natasha Saputo; Patrick J. O'Toole , Jr.; Paul T. Ehrlich; Robert L Gerrity; Ruben J. Rodrigues; Samantha A. Jameson; Sarah Chapin Columbia; Stefani C. Smith; Utsav Gupta | ||
Firms | Birnbaum and Godkin; Birnbaum and Godkin, LLP; Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP; Cleary Gottlieb Steen and Hamilton LLP; Foley & Lardner LLP; Gordon & Rees Scully Mansukhani; McDermott Will & Emery LLP; McDermott Will and Emery LLP; Ruben J. Rodrigues; Tenesity Law Group LLP; Tensegrity Law Group LLP; Tensegrity Law Group, LLP; Weil Gotshal and Manges; Weil Gotshal Manges LLP; Weil, Gotshal & Manges | ||
Link to Docket | External link to docket |
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. 10X Genomics, Inc.
Biologic Drugs cited in Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. 10X Genomics, Inc.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. 10X Genomics, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2020)
Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020-05-15 | 107 | Answer to Complaint | 0053798 A1 (“Hindson 798”). 10 PRAYER FOR RELIEF 11 WHEREFORE…counts relating to 10 the 444 and 277 Patents are not transferred to this Court. 11 5. …Bio-Rad”) as it relates to U.S. Patent No. 10,190,115 (the “115 Patent”), in particular, Count III 3 …for infringement of the 444 and 277 Patents, not the 115 10 Patent. Except as expressly admitted, 10X…unenforceability of one or more claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,190,115 (the “115 Patent”). 15 | External link to document |
>Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |