DrugPatentWatch Database Preview
Litigation Details for ACRUX DDS PTY LTD. v. SANDOZ INC. (S.D. Ind. 2017)
» See Plans and Pricing
ACRUX DDS PTY LTD. v. SANDOZ INC. (S.D. Ind. 2017)
| Docket | Start Trial | Date Filed | 2017-10-23 |
| Court | District Court, S.D. Indiana | Date Terminated | |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Sarah Evans Barker |
| Jury Demand | None | Referred To | Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Parties | ACRUX DDS PTY LTD. | ||
| Patents | 8,435,944; 8,993,520; 9,180,194 | ||
| Attorneys | Anne N. DePrez | ||
| Firms | BARNES & THORNBURG LLP (Indianapolis) | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in ACRUX DDS PTY LTD. v. SANDOZ INC.
The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is Start Trial .
Details for ACRUX DDS PTY LTD. v. SANDOZ INC. (S.D. Ind. 2017)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-10-23 | 1 | infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,435,944 (“the ’944 patent”), 8,993,520 (“the ’520 patent”), and 9,180,194…FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT (Direct Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,435,944) …FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT (Inducement To Infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,435,944) … (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,435,944) 66. Plaintiff incorporates… a) United States Patent Nos. 8,435,944, 8,993,520, and 9,180,194 are valid and | External link to document | |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
