Litigation Details for Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2017)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
▶ Start for $1
Remove trial restrictions
Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2017)
| Docket | See Plans and Pricing | Date Filed | 2017-02-22 |
| Court | District Court, N.D. California | Date Terminated | 2018-02-08 |
| Cause | 28:1338 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | William Haskell Alsup |
| Jury Demand | Both | Referred To | |
| Parties | OTTO TRUCKING LLC | ||
| Patents | 10,029,011; 10,029,015; 10,030,051; 10,030,059; 10,036,037; 10,036,054; 10,041,044; 10,046,056; 10,046,058; 10,047,033; 10,086,005; 10,114,012; 10,183,002; 6,002,008; 6,005,001; 6,011,007; 6,020,001; 7,014,098; 7,157,017; 7,173,016; 8,008,003; 8,008,006; 8,017,150; 8,039,009; 8,039,010; 8,048,017; 8,058,052; 9,000,011; 9,000,021; 9,000,038; 9,000,041; 9,005,056; 9,016,147; 9,022,022; 9,023,001; 9,024,007; 9,028,005; 9,035,031; 9,035,033; 9,056,052; 9,109,010 | ||
| Attorneys | Whitney B. Weber | ||
| Firms | Melissa B Felder , | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Biologic Drugs cited in Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , See Plans and Pricing , and See Plans and Pricing .
Details for Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2017)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-27 | 1035 | Opposition/Response to Motion | Waymo disclosed: 6 108. 7 8 9 109. 10 11 12 (Dkt. 25-7 at Nos. 108 and 109.) …claims of 9 trade secret misappropriation and patent infringement to pursue at trial. To hold otherwise…12 cv 630 (N.D. Cal 2012) (infringement of four patents alleged on 25 preliminary injunction (‘647, ‘604…but trial alleged infringement of five 26 patents, including two not raised on preliminary injunction…2017 9 February 2018 3:17-cv-00939 830 Patent Both District Court, N.D. California | External link to document |
| 2017-08-04 | 1086 | Exhibit 8 [REDACTED] | 09:35:33 9 MS. RAY: …2017 9 February 2018 3:17-cv-00939 830 Patent Both District Court, N.D. California | External link to document |
| 2017-08-04 | 1088 | Revised Redacted Version of [1059-6] | 10 attorneys? 10:41:44 11 or Uber attempted to learn what the subject…23 February 2017 3:17-cv-00939 830 Patent Both District Court, N.D. California | External link to document |
| 2017-04-05 | 154 | Exhibit A | 5.6 5.1.1.2 Current Output Sensing Readout … system tractable. First, CTI has demonstrated (patent pending) 1.5 m wavelength, single frequency, diffraction-limited…, H.W., “3D Imaging Laser Radar,” United States Patent 6,133,989, October 17, 2000. Stettner, R., and…and Bailey, H.W., 3D Imaging Laser Radar, U.S. Patent 6,133,989, Advanced Scientific Concepts, Inc. October…Degree-of-Freedom Telescoping Geometry Scanner, U.S. Patent Number 6,600,553, July 29, 2003. Texas Instruments | External link to document |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
