Litigation Details for Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Apple Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2018)

✉ Email this page to a colleague

Docket	⤷ Try a Trial	Date Filed	2018-01-16
Court	District Court, N.D. California	Date Terminated	2020-12-09
Cause	35:271 Patent Infringement	Assigned To	William Haskell Alsup
Jury Demand	Both	Referred To	Donna M. Ryu
Patents	10,029,015; 6,011,007; 6,020,001; 9,023,001
Link to Docket	External link to docket

The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is ⤷ Try a Trial .

Subscribe to access the full database, or Try a Trial
Date Filed	Document No.	Description	Snippet	Link To Document
2020-10-22	165	Exhibit C - Hearing Transcript	particular [4] - 18:3, pocket [1] - 31:10 29:15, 29:24 15:11 …licensing patents -- excuse me. 17 Enforcing and licensing patents. Without valid patents, its…the business of 11 patents, and they are one of the more prolific patent 12 enforcement shops… SNYDER: As the patent owner, you have that, 20 that ability. The patent owner has the ability… Musk, he's a 22 patent owner. He continues to get patents and moved the, 23 moved	External link to document
2020-11-11	177	Intervene	Filed 11/12/20 Page 6 of 20 1 OTHER AUTHORITIES 2 Abby Rives, Fortress Patent Fight Shows Abusive…24 amounts paid to license Uniloc’s patents. Because a patent grants its owner exclusive rights, Uniloc…use its patents. See F.T.C. v. Actavis, Inc., 570 U.S. 136, 147 (2013) (“[A] 26 valid patent excludes… ownership of the patents-in-suit and thus its right to assert those patents against individuals and… Uniloc’s patent assertion activities because it “is 26 one of the most active [patent assertion	External link to document
>Date Filed	>Document No.	>Description	>Snippet	>Link To Document