➤ Get the DrugPatentWatch Daily Briefing

Get Daily Updates on Generic Entry, Litigation, Biosimilars, and more …

Serving leading biopharmaceutical companies globally:

Medtronic
Harvard Business School
Moodys
McKinsey
Merck
Colorcon

Last Updated: July 2, 2020

DrugPatentWatch Database Preview

Litigation Details for Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc. v. Noble Corporation plc (S.D. Tex. 2017)


Email this page to a colleague

» See Plans and Pricing

« Back to Dashboard

Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc. v. Noble Corporation plc (S.D. Tex. 2017)

Docket   Start Trial Date Filed 2017-01-16
Court District Court, S.D. Texas Date Terminated
Cause 28:1338 Patent Infringement Assigned To George Carol Hanks Jr.
Jury Demand Both Referred To
Parties NOBLE CORPORATION; NOBLE CORPORATION PLC; NOBLE DRILLING (U.S.) INC.; NOBLE DRILLING (U.S.) LLC; NOBLE DRILLING AMERICAS LLC; NOBLE DRILLING EXPLORATION COMPANY; NOBLE DRILLING HOLDING LLC; NOBLE DRILLING SERVICES INC.; NOBLE LEASING III (SWITZERLAND) GMBH; TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING INC.
Patents 8,940,517; 9,931,336
Attorneys David Lee Terrell; Hector Raul Chavez , III; J. Reid Bumgarner; Jean C Frizzell; John Christopher Reynolds; Lee L Kaplan; Lindsey Hargrove Raspino; Michael Steven McCoy; Robert J McAughan , Jr; Yevgeniy Zilberman
Firms Amatong McCoy LLc; Attorney at Law; McAugan Deaver PLLC; Port & Bumgarner LLP; Reynolds Frizzell LLP; Smyser Kaplan & Veselka; Smyser Kaplan & Veselka, LLP; Smyser Kaplan Et Al; Smyser, Kaplan & Veselka, LLP; Yetter Coleman LLP
Link to Docket External link to docket
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc. v. Noble Corporation plc
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are   Start Trial and   Start Trial .
Biologic Drugs cited in Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc. v. Noble Corporation plc
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are   Start Trial and   Start Trial .

Details for Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc. v. Noble Corporation plc (S.D. Tex. 2017)

Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document
2020-04-02 177 Memorandum and Opinion Technology, Inc. v. Speakeasy, Inc., 437 Fed. App’x 940, 940–41 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (transferring appeal to the… Licensed Patents. Dkt. 133-1 at p. 5; Dkt. 94 at p. 8. The closest…scope of any claim of the [patents-in-suit]” (Dkt. 133-1 at p. 5; Dkt. 94 at p. 8). Under Diversey and Flex-Foot…Pittsburgh, PA v. CBI Industries, Inc., 907 S.W.2d 517, 520 (Tex. 1995). A term left poorly defined…of Transocean’s patents relating to dual-activity offshore drilling rigs (“the patents-in-suit”). However External link to document
>Date Filed >Document No. >Description >Snippet >Link To Document

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Serving leading biopharmaceutical companies globally:

Medtronic
Express Scripts
McKesson
Baxter
McKinsey
AstraZeneca

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.