Litigation Details for Sentius International, LLC v. Apple Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2020)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Sentius International, LLC v. Apple Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2020)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2020-01-22 |
| Court | District Court, N.D. California | Date Terminated | |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Jury Demand | Plaintiff | Referred To | |
| Parties | APPLE, INC.; SENTIUS INTERNATIONAL, LLC | ||
| Patents | 10,014,079; 10,035,838; 10,036,037; 10,173,985; 10,496,838; 10,550,193; 10,550,437; 10,556,008; 10,556,024; 10,556,037; 10,556,942; 6,146,672; 7,018,985; 7,045,601; 7,078,020; 7,232,919; 7,244,877; 7,316,067; 7,488,316; 7,488,496; 7,705,045; 7,713,570; 7,713,929; 7,838,227; 8,006,690; 8,062,044; 8,193,182; 8,343,985; 8,633,178; 8,699,019; 8,822,496; 8,822,651; 8,877,193; 8,877,480; 8,877,705; 8,883,244; 8,883,794; 8,883,838; 9,005,182; 9,011,957; 9,012,437; 9,023,646; 9,062,101; 9,173,942; 9,193,797; 9,522,945; 9,651,550; 9,651,556; 9,656,991; 9,763,945; 9,763,985; 9,797,901; 9,797,953; 9,815,945; 9,822,129; 9,868,838; RE43,797 | ||
| Attorneys | Alton L. Absher; Alton Luther Absher , III; Andrew Nathan Saul; Bindu Ann George Palapura; Brian E. Farnan; David Ellis Moore; Mansi Hasendra Shah; Matthew Joseph Meyer; Michael J. Farnan; Robert J Yorio , Jr.; Robert Joseph Yorio; Sandeep Seth; Steven David Moore; Tracey E. Timlin | ||
| Firms | Carr and Ferrell LLP; Farnan LLP; Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP; Kilpatrick Townsend and Stockton LLP; Stubbs Alderton and Markiles LLP | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Sentius International, LLC v. Apple Inc.
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Biologic Drugs cited in Sentius International, LLC v. Apple Inc.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for Sentius International, LLC v. Apple Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2020)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-09 | 41 | Dismiss | .S. Patent No. RE43,633 and of joint infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8 RE43,633 and 7,672,985. This….S. Patent No. RE43,633 and of joint infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. RE43,633 and 15 7,672,985 under… all asserted claims of the ʼ633 patent and U.S. Patent No. 7,672,985. 23 First, Sentius alleges…joint infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. RE43,633 and 15 7,672,985 should be dismissed for…accused of infringing the ‘633 and ‘985 Patents ([“]Accused Apple Products”) provide a specific | External link to document |
| 2020-04-27 | 48 | Opposition/Response to Motion | claim for direct infringement of the ‘633 10 and ‘985 Patents on a joint or divided infringement theory…infringement of method claims in the ‘633 and ‘985 10 Patents. For all the reasons set forth above, these… method Claim 62 of the ‘633 Patent and method Claim 1 of the ‘985 Patent. As noted by the Court 28 …required by the method claims of the ‘633 Patent and the ‘985 Patent are all automatically 17 performed…grammar suggestions. See SAC ¶¶ 50 (‘633 Patent) and 70 (‘985 Patent) (“Apple’s 24 design of such software | External link to document |
| 2020-06-02 | 55 | Order on Motion to Dismiss | infringement of two of its patents, namely U.S. 14 Patent No. RE43,633 (the…Complaint for Patent Infringment. Amended Pleadings due by 6/23/2020. Responses due by 7/14/2020. (fs,… 10 activity or receipt of a benefit upon performance of a step or steps of a patented method”…the “’633 Patent”) and 7,672,985 (the “’985 Patent”). Now before the …633 Patent, as well as claims 1 and 11 of the 24 ’985 Patent, through | External link to document |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
