Litigation Details for SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ACTAVIS INC. (D.N.J. 2013)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ACTAVIS INC. (D.N.J. 2013)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2013-08-07 |
| Court | District Court, D. New Jersey | Date Terminated | 2016-02-17 |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Renee Marie Bumb |
| Jury Demand | None | Referred To | Joel Schneider |
| Parties | SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. | ||
| Patents | 7,722,898; 7,910,131; 8,617,600 | ||
| Attorneys | JENNIFER C. CRITCHLEY | ||
| Firms | Connell, Foley | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ACTAVIS INC.
The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. ACTAVIS INC. (D.N.J. 2013)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-11-17 | 170 | of 9 PageID: 4062 contentions for U.S. Patent No. 8,617,600. Exhibit 3 is a discovery order in Medtronic… 18 February 2016 1:13-cv-04740 830 Patent None District Court, D. New Jersey | External link to document | |
| 2016-02-04 | 418 | infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 7,722,898 (the “’898 Patent”), 7,910,131 (the “’131 Patent”), and 8,617,600…,600 (the “’600 Patent”) (collectively, the “Supernus Patents” or the “Patents-in-Suit”). …the ’898 Patent and the ’131 Patent; (2) the Defendants will not infringe the ’600 Patent; and (3) … Patents-in-Suit 1. The Patents-in-Suit The Patents-in-Suit describe…samples,” ’898 Patent, col. 12, ll. 33-37; ’131 Patent, col. 12, 11. 32-36; ’600 Patent, col. 12, ll | External link to document | |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
