➤ Get the DrugPatentWatch Daily Briefing

Get Daily Updates on Generic Entry, Litigation, Biosimilars, and more …

Serving leading biopharmaceutical companies globally:

Baxter
McKinsey
McKesson
Express Scripts
Boehringer Ingelheim
Johnson and Johnson

Last Updated: October 26, 2021

DrugPatentWatch Database Preview

Litigation Details for SPEX Technologies Inc v. Kingston Technology Corporation (C.D. Cal. 2016)


Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard

SPEX Technologies Inc v. Kingston Technology Corporation (C.D. Cal. 2016)

Docket ⤷  Free Forever Trial Date Filed 2016-09-27
Court District Court, C.D. California Date Terminated 2020-09-23
Cause 35:271 Patent Infringement Assigned To James V. Selna
Jury Demand Plaintiff Referred To Alicia G. Rosenberg
Parties DATA LOCKER INTERNATIONAL, LLC; DATALOCKER, INC; IMATION CORPORATION; KINGSTON DIGITAL INC; KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY INC; KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION; SPEX TECHNOLOGIES INC
Patents 10,010,083; 7,022,014; 8,013,112; 8,017,830; 8,048,017; 8,063,004; 8,067,025; 9,022,022; 9,024,141
Attorneys Adam S Hoffman; Andrew David Weiss; Anshul M Mehra; Benjamin T Wang; Christine Hwang Yang; Claire J Krebs; Daniel B Weinger; David M Hoffman; David S Morris; Devan V Padmanabhan; Douglas Wayne Robinson; Erin Kathryn Overom Dungan; Garrett K Sakimae; Jacob Robert Buczko; Joanna M Fuller; Justin Eric Maio; Marc A Fenster; Mayela Carmen Montenegro; Michael T Renaud; Michelle E Dawson; Minna Y Chan; Nada I Shamonki; Nadeem W Schwen; Oliver James Richards; Paul A Kroeger; Ryan D Dykal; Scott R Brown; Stephen J Akerley; Victoria D Hao; Vivian I Orlando
Firms Fish & Richardson PC; Fish and Richardson; Fish and Richardson PC; Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP; Hovey Williams LLP; Law Office of Victoria Hao; Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC; Padmanabhan & Dawson, P.L.L.C.; Russ August & Kabat; Russ August and Kabat; S J Christine Yang Law Offices; Shook Hardy and Bacon LLP; Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP; Winthrop & Weinstine
Link to Docket External link to docket
Small Molecule Drugs cited in SPEX Technologies Inc v. Kingston Technology Corporation
The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is ⤷  Free Forever Trial .
Biologic Drugs cited in SPEX Technologies Inc v. Kingston Technology Corporation

The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷  Free Forever Trial , ⤷  Free Forever Trial , ⤷  Free Forever Trial , and ⤷  Free Forever Trial .

Details for SPEX Technologies Inc v. Kingston Technology Corporation (C.D. Cal. 2016)

Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document
2020-03-13 233 Exhibit P 19,23;66:4,10;78:12; 64:24;65:10,10;83:3 11:12;18:19,21; 47:14;50:15,19… Patent and Trademark Office, 6 Patent Trial and Appeal… Patent and Trademark Office, 12 Patent Trial and Appeal… 6 registered patent agent? 7 A. I am not a registered patent agent. 8 …haven't taught a class on patent law -- only on 23 patent law, but I have addressed it in External link to document
2020-05-26 382 Objection/Opposition (Motion related) 27 September 2016 17 May 2018 8:16-cv-01790 830 Patent Both District Court External link to document
2020-05-26 383 Objection/Opposition (Motion related) 27 September 2016 17 May 2018 8:16-cv-01790 830 Patent Both District Court External link to document
2020-05-26 384 Objection/Opposition (Motion related) 27 September 2016 17 May 2018 8:16-cv-01790 830 Patent Both District Court External link to document
2020-05-26 385 Declaration (Motion related) 27 September 2016 17 May 2018 8:16-cv-01790 830 Patent Both District Court External link to document
2020-05-27 387 Response in Opposition to Motion 27 September 2016 17 May 2018 8:16-cv-01790 830 Patent Both District Court External link to document
>Date Filed >Document No. >Description >Snippet >Link To Document

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Serving leading biopharmaceutical companies globally:

McKinsey
Boehringer Ingelheim
Dow
Baxter
Medtronic
Mallinckrodt

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.