Make Better Decisions - Finding and Evaluating Generic and Branded Drug Market Entry Opportunities

Get the Book: Make Better Decisions

Finding and Evaluating Generic and Branded Drug Market Entry Opportunities

PDF eBook: Just $10 Get Print Book on Amazon

Serving hundreds of leading biopharmaceutical companies globally:

Citi
Harvard Business School
Moodys
Daiichi Sankyo
US Army
Fish and Richardson

Generated: July 17, 2019

DrugPatentWatch Database Preview

Litigation Details for SHIRE LLC v. AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC (D.N.J. 2011)

Try a free trialSee Plans and Pricing

« Back to Dashboard

SHIRE LLC v. AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC (D.N.J. 2011)

Docket ➤ Sign Up Date Filed 2011-06-30
Court District Court, D. New Jersey Date Terminated 2014-07-22
Cause 35:271 Patent Infringement Assigned To Stanley R. Chesler
Jury Demand Defendant Referred To Cathy L. Waldor
Parties ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC; ACTAVIS INC.; ACTAVIS LLC; ACTAVIS, INC.; AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC; JOHNSON MATTHEY INC.; JOHNSON MATTHEY PHARMACEUTICAL MATERIALS; MYLAN INC.; MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.; ROXANE LABORATORIES INC.; SANDOZ INC.; SANDOZ INC.; SHIRE DEVELOPMENT INC.; SHIRE DEVELOPMENT LLC; SHIRE LLC
Patents 7,105,486; 7,223,735; 7,655,630; 7,659,253; 7,659,254; 7,662,787; 7,662,788; 7,671,030; 7,671,031; 7,674,774; 7,678,770; 7,678,771; 7,687,466; 7,687,467; 7,700,561; 7,713,936; 7,718,619; 7,723,305
Attorneys ARNOLD B. CALMANN; CHARLES H. CHEVALIER; CHRISTINA LYNN SAVERIANO; DANIEL GINZBURG; DIANE C. RAGOSA; ELEONORE OFOSU-ANTWI; ELLEN T. LOWENTHAL; ERIC I. ABRAHAM; GERI L. ALBIN; GREGORY ROBERT HAWORTH; HECTOR DANIEL RUIZ; JEFFREY S. SOOS; JOSEPHINE LIU; KATELYN O'REILLY; KENNETH EARL CROWELL; LISA H. WANG; LIZA M. WALSH; MICHAEL R. GRIFFINGER; RICHARD FRANK KURZ; ROBERT C. BRADY; SHEILA F. MCSHANE; STUART D. SENDER; THEODORA T. MCCORMICK; TONIA O. KLAUSNER; TRICIA B. O'REILLY
Link to Docket External link to docket
Small Molecule Drugs cited in SHIRE LLC v. AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC
The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is ➤ Sign Up .

Details for SHIRE LLC v. AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC (D.N.J. 2011)

Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document
2011-06-30 1 Complaint Code, involving United States Patent No. '7,105,486 (“the ’486 patent”) (attached as Exhibit A hereto…’031 patent, the ’774 patent, the ’770 patent, the ’771 patent, the ’466 patent, the ’467 patent, the …’486 patent, the ’735 patent, the ’630 patent, the ’253 patent, the ’787 patent, the ’030 patent, the …’486 patent, the ’735 patent, the ’630 patcnt, the ’253 patent, the ’787 patent, the ’030 patent, the … ’031 patent, the ’774 patent, the ’770patent, the ’771 patent, the ’466 patent, the ’467 patent, the External link to document
2013-08-08 368 Opinion action, eighteen patents are at issue: U.S. Patent No. 7,105,486 (the “’486 patent”); …630 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 7,659,253 (the “’253 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 7,659,254…“’788 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 7,671,030 (the “’030 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 7,671,031…“’031 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 7,674,774 (the “’774 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 7,678,770…“’770 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 7,678,771 (the “’771 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 7,687,466 External link to document
2013-12-26 456 Opinion embodiment covered by the claims of Patent No. 7,659,253 (“the ‘235 patent”) was sold or offered for sale…context of patent litigation, Federal Circuit precedent governs the interpretation of local patent rules …collectively “Defendants”) for leave to amend its Local Patent Rule 3.7 Initial Invalidity and Non-Infringement…Discussion A. Legal Standard Local Patent Rule 3.7 (“Rule 3.7”) of the Local Rules of Civil…involved in the substance of enforcement of the patent right.” O2 Micro International Ltd. v. Monolithic External link to document
2014-02-21 499 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 7,662,787 are invalid as anticipated by Australian Patent Specification …ANTICIPATION OF CLAIMS 1, 2 AND 5 OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,662,787 TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: PLEASE…02/21/14 Page 2 of 3 PageID: 108732 Patent No. 7,662,787 are invalid as anticipated, for an Order…2011 22 July 2014 2:11-cv-03781 830 Patent Defendant District Court, D. External link to document
2014-02-22 527 Judgment of Noninfringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,700,561 and 7,662,788; Rule 56.1 Statement of Undisputed…2011 22 July 2014 2:11-cv-03781 830 Patent Defendant District Court, D. External link to document
Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document

Subscribe to access the full database, or try a Free Trial

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Serving hundreds of leading biopharmaceutical companies globally:

Fish and Richardson
US Department of Justice
Chubb
Deloitte
Baxter
Queensland Health

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verifification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.