Litigation Details for Rex Medical, L.P. v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (D. Del. 2019)

Rex Medical, L.P. v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (D. Del. 2019)

Docket		Date Filed	2019-01-02
Court	District Court, D. Delaware	Date Terminated
Cause	35:271 Patent Infringement	Assigned To	Maryellen Noreika
Jury Demand		Referred To
Patents	10,369,135; 10,376,564; 6,439,572; 7,140,439; 7,309,510; 7,572,779; 7,722,898; 7,906,134; 8,182,831; 8,309,572; 8,415,395; 8,535,779; 8,722,650; 8,906,774; 8,906,885; 8,906,898; 8,980,319; 8,980,885; 9,049,885; 9,439,841; 9,439,886; 9,439,906; 9,517,439; 9,572,779; 9,572,796; 9,650,395; 9,844,510
Link to Docket	External link to docket

Biologic Drugs cited in Rex Medical, L.P. v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

Details for Rex Medical, L.P. v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (D. Del. 2019)

Date Filed	Document No.	Description	Snippet	Link To Document
2020-05-05	76	Order - -Memorandum and Order	Teva, 135 S. Ct. at 841. Extrinsic evidence “consists of all evidence external to the patent and prosecution…seeking inter partes review of the ’650 Patent.[10] And it does not appear that Plaintiff … uCloudlink Network Tech. Ltd., 376 F. Supp. 3d 369, 381–82 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (overcoming the SuperGuide…necessary. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 831, 837-38 (2015). “[T]he words of a claim….3d 1370, 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2017); see also Teva, 135 S. Ct. at 842-43. “Any fact critical to a holding	External link to document