Litigation Details for Reckitt Benckiser LLC v. Aurobindo Pharma Limited (D. Del. 2014)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Reckitt Benckiser LLC v. Aurobindo Pharma Limited (D. Del. 2014)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2014-09-17 |
| Court | District Court, D. Delaware | Date Terminated | 2017-03-13 |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Leonard Philip Stark |
| Jury Demand | None | Referred To | |
| Parties | AUROBINDO PHARMA LIMITED | ||
| Patents | 6,372,252; 6,955,821; 7,838,032 | ||
| Attorneys | Alison T. Gelsleichter | ||
| Firms | Devlin Law Firm | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Reckitt Benckiser LLC v. Aurobindo Pharma Limited
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for Reckitt Benckiser LLC v. Aurobindo Pharma Limited (D. Del. 2014)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-12 | 100 | Stark from Pilar G. Kraman regarding U.S. Patent No. 6,372,252. (Kraman, Pilar) (Entered: 08/12/2016) …2014 13 March 2017 1:14-cv-01203 830 Patent None District Court, D. Delaware | External link to document | |
| 2016-09-01 | 116 | infringement of U.S Patent Nos. 6,372,252 (the “’252 Patent”), 6,955,821 (the “’821 Patent”) and 7,838,032…7,838,032 (the “’032 Patent”) (the “Patents-in-Suit”) on or about September 17, 2014.2 During fact discovery…only characterizes the patents in general.3 In fact, each of the asserted patent claims requires certain… administration. See, e.g., ’821 patent claims 1 and 29, ‘032 patent claim 1. Aurobindo’s ANDA product…Hearing, unlike the ’252 patent at issue in Watson, the ’821 and ’032 patents at issue here have no separate | External link to document | |
| 2016-09-15 | 125 | Robert S. Langer Regarding Validity of U.S. Patents Nos. 6,955,821 and 7,838,032 filed by Reckitt Benckiser…2014 13 March 2017 1:14-cv-01203 830 Patent None District Court, D. Delaware | External link to document | |
| 2016-11-03 | 134 | alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,372,252 (the "'252 patent"), 6,955,821 (the …;'821 patent"), and 7;838,032 (the· "'032 patent"). 1 The patents are directed…;It is a bedrock principle of patent law that the claims ofa patent define the invention to which…reading the entire patent." Id. at 13 21 (internal quotation marks omitted). The patent specification…the context of the '032 patent-in-suit, because the '032 patent issued from an application that | External link to document | |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
