➤ Get the DrugPatentWatch Daily Briefing

Get Daily Updates on Generic Entry, Litigation, Biosimilars, and more …

Serving leading biopharmaceutical companies globally:

Johnson and Johnson
Express Scripts

Last Updated: September 29, 2020

DrugPatentWatch Database Preview

Litigation Details for Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2010)

➤ Get the DrugPatentWatch Daily Briefing
» See Plans and Pricing

« Back to Dashboard

Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2010)

Docket   Start Trial Date Filed 2010-08-12
Court District Court, N.D. California Date Terminated 2016-07-05
Cause 35:271 Patent Infringement Assigned To William Haskell Alsup
Jury Demand Both Referred To Donna M. Ryu
Patents RE36,994; RE38,522; RE38,551; RE38,912
Attorneys Alanna Rutherford ,; Alyssa M. Caridis; Ameri Rose Klafeta; Andrew David Silverman; Annette L. Hurst; Ayanna Lewis-Gruss; Beko Osiris Ra Reblitz-Richardson; Benjamin Andrew Petersen; Benjamin George Damstedt; Brian Christopher Banner; Bruce W. Baber; Cheryl A. Sabnis; Christa M. Anderson; Christina Marie Von der Ahe Rayburn; Christopher C. Carnaval; Dana K Powers; Daniel Edward Purcell; Daniel Pierre Muino; David Boies; Deborah Kay Miller; Denise Marie Mingrone; Donald Frederick Zimmer , Jr.; Dorian Estelle Daley; Edward Andrew Bayley; Elizabeth Ann Egan; Eugene Morris Paige; Gabriel M. Ramsey; Geoffrey Gavin Moss; Geoffrey M. Ezgar; Heather Janine Meeker; Ian Ballon; James L. Day; Jeffrey Larter Cox; Jennifer Brenda Bonneville; John Harrison L'Estrange , Jr.; John L. Cooper; Joseph Richard Wetzel; Karen G. Johnson-McKewan; Kate Ellis Lazarus; Kenneth Alexander Kuwayti; Lawrence Paul Riff; Lisa T. Simpson; Luis Villa , IV; Marc David Peters; Mark Edward Ungerman; Mark H. Francis; Matthew Lee Bush; Matthew M. Sarboraria; Matthias Andreas Kamber; Maya Beth Karwande; Melinda Haag; Meredith Richardson Dearborn; Michael A. Jacobs; Michael Louis Fazio; Michael S Kwun; Michelle OMeara Cousineau; Nathan D Shaffer; Nathan P. Eimer; Pamela Reasor Hanebutt; Peter A Bicks; Randall Scott Luskey; Reid Patrick Mullen; Renny F Hwang; Richard Steven Ballinger; Robert Addy Van Nest; Robert F. Perry; Robert P. Varian; Roman A Swoopes; Ruchika Agrawal; Rudolph Kim; Sarah Brienne Faulkner; Scott T. Weingaertner; Steven A. Hirsch; Steven Christopher Holtzman; Steven T Snyder; Susan Mary Maile Razzano; Truman Haymaker Fenton; Valerie Wing Ho; Vickie L. Feeman; Wendy Michelle Mantell; William Fred Norton , Jr.; Yuka Teraguchi
Firms Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP; Boies Schiller and Flexner; Boies Schiller Flexner LLP; Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP; Cooley LLP; Dorian Estelle Daley ,; Eimer Stahl LLP; Farella Braun Martel LLP; Google Inc.; Greenberg Traurig; Greenberg Traurig LLP; Greenberg Traurig, LLP; Keker & Van Nest LLP; Keker and Van Nest LLP; Keker Van Nest & Peters LLP; Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP; King & Spalding; King & Spalding LLP; King and Spalding LLP; King Spalding LLP; Kwun Bhansali Lazarus LLP; Law Office of Christina Von Der Ahe Rayburn; Morrison & Foerster; Morrison & Foerster LLP; O'Melveny & Myers LLP; Oracle America, Inc.; Oracle Corporation; Oracle USA, Inc. Legal Department; Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP; Orrick Herrington and Sutcliffe LLP; Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP; Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges LLP; Slayden Grubert Beard PLLC; Steptoe and Johnson LLP; The Norton Law Firm; Ungerman IP PLLC; Wright, L'Estrange
Link to Docket External link to docket
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are   Start Trial and   Start Trial .
Biologic Drugs cited in Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are   Start Trial ,   Start Trial , and   Start Trial .

Details for Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2010)

Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document
2012-06-20 1212 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law United States Patents Nos. RE38,104 (“the ’104 patent”) and 10 6,061,520 (“the ’520 patent”). Google infringes…the ’104 patent 10 Oracle is also entitled to JMOL on infringement of ’104 patent claims 27…520 PATENT 13 Oracle proved Google’s dx tool infringes Claims 1 and 20 of the ’520 patent. 14…DEFENSES TO PATENT INFRINGEMENT 7 Oracle moved for JMOL as to Google’s Sixth (patent misuse),…Leadsinger, Inc. v. BMG Music Publ’g, 15 512 F.3d 522 (9th Cir. 2008).................................. External link to document
2011-02-02 79 Exhibit resulting in RE36,204 which is a Reissue of 07/994,655 (filed 14 Dec. 22, 1992) which is U.S. Patent No. 5,…Claims 11-41 of United States Patent No. RE38,104 (“the ’104 reissue patent”) 18 (…2, 3, 4, and 8 of United States Patent No. 6,910,205 (“the ’205 patent”) 20 (infringement…16 of United States Patent No. 5,966,702 (“the ’702 22 patent”) (infringement claim… Claims 1-24 of United States Patent No. 6,125,447 (“the ’447 patent”) 24 (infringement External link to document
2012-04-15 923 Exhibit List 11/21/1996 Certified File History of U.S. Patent No. RE36,204 (Gosling) OAGOOGLE0000113789… 4013 4/27/1999 Certified U.S. Patent No. RE36,204 (James Gosling) … ‘447 Patent ‐ EX B) 2594 Claim Chart:  US Patent No. 6,125,447 and U.S. Patent No. 5,958,050… ‘476 Patent ‐ EX B) 2599 Claim Chart:  US Patent No. 6,192,476 and U.S. Patent No. 5,412,717…REMOVED 0993 EXHIBIT REMOVED 0994 Aug‐10 Android Zygot Startup, available External link to document
>Date Filed >Document No. >Description >Snippet >Link To Document

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Serving leading biopharmaceutical companies globally:

Harvard Business School

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.