DrugPatentWatch Database Preview
Litigation Details for Optis Wireless Technology, LLC v. Apple Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2019)
» See Plans and Pricing
Optis Wireless Technology, LLC v. Apple Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2019)
| Docket | Start Trial | Date Filed | 2019-02-25 |
| Court | District Court, E.D. Texas | Date Terminated | |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | James Rodney Gilstrap |
| Jury Demand | Plaintiff | Referred To | |
| Parties | APPLE INC.; DONALD E TILLER; HON. LAYN R. PHILLIPS; OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC; OPTIS WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY, LLC; PANOPTIS PATENT MANAGEMENT, LLC; UNWIRED PLANET INTERNATIONAL LIMITED; UNWIRED PLANET, LLC | ||
| Patents | 10,029,011; 10,029,015; 10,030,051; 10,030,059; 10,036,037; 10,036,054; 10,041,044; 10,046,031; 10,046,056; 10,047,033; 10,611,989; 6,669,948; 7,989,412; 8,039,009; 8,044,046; 8,048,043; 8,058,052; 8,858,973; 9,000,011; 9,000,021; 9,000,041; 9,005,016; 9,005,056; 9,023,001; 9,024,007; 9,035,033; 9,040,034; 9,056,051; 9,056,057; 9,056,059; 9,861,603 | ||
| Attorneys | Amy R. Pearlman; Andrew J. Strabone; Ben Ernst; Bethany M. Stevens; Brittany Amadi; Christine Michelle Woodin; Christopher Paul McNett; Daniel C. Wewers; David Thomas DeZern; Elliot Z. Chen; Eric Sean Tautfest; Erik Bruce Fountain; Hannah Lynn Cannom; Holly Elin Engelmann; Hong Annita Zhong; Ingrid Marie Haslund Petersen; Jared M Hoggan; Jason G Sheasby; Jennifer J. John; Jennifer Leigh Truelove; Jonathan Randy Yim; Josefina Garcia; Joseph F Haag; Joseph J Mueller; Kathryn Zalewski; Kevin Joseph O'Brien; Kevin Lee Burgess; Mara Jill Bindler; Mark D. Selwyn; Mary (Mindy) V Sooter; Melissa Richards Smith; Michael J Summersgill; Michaela P. Sewall; Mike McKool; Samuel Franklin Baxter; Seth Raymond Hasenour; Steven John Pollinger; Theodore Stevenson , III; Timothy D. Syrett | ||
| Firms | Caldwell Cassady & Curry, PC; Gillam and Smith LLP; Gray Reed & McGraw, P.C.; Gray Reed & McGraw, PC - Dallas; Gray Reed, LLP Dallas; Irell & Manella - Los Angeles; Irell & Manella - Newport Beach; McKool Smith Austin; McKool Smith Dallas; McKool Smith Marshall; McKool Smith PC D.C.; McKool Smith, P.C. Marshall; McKool Smith, PC Austin; Sidley Austin LLP San Francisco; Walker Stevens Cannom Yang LLP; Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP - Palo Alto; Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP - Washington, DC; Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, LLP-Boston; Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, LLP-Denver; Wilmer Hale Boston | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Optis Wireless Technology, LLC v. Apple Inc.
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , and Start Trial .
Biologic Drugs cited in Optis Wireless Technology, LLC v. Apple Inc.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , Start Trial , and Start Trial .
Details for Optis Wireless Technology, LLC v. Apple Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2019)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-07 | 130 | Memorandum & Opinion | “’833 Patent”), No. 8,385,284 (the “’284 Patent”), No. 8,411,557 (the “’557 Patent”), No. 8,989,290 (…evidence: ’332 Patent Figs.8, 9, 11–14, 8:5–29, 9:56, 9:61–63, 10:21–22, 10:36–38; U.S. Patent No. 8,213,…Intrinsic evidence: ’332 Patent at 8:7–29, 9:62–63, 10:22–25, 10:32–43; U.S. Patent No. 7,973,004 13 (Defendant…Madisetti. 10 Declaration of Mark Lanning Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 4-3(B): U.S. Patent No. 8,019,332…58); U.S. Patent No. 8,717,904 File Wrapper (Defendant’s Ex. 9, Dkt. No. 86-10); U.S. Patent No. 8,213,377 | External link to document |
| 2020-08-12 | 489 | Transcript | . I have three kids all under the age of 10:41:44 4 seven. I'm the first assistant … holds patents. We hold 10:59:29 16 these five patents. We own these patents. …Plaintiffs' asserted patents, and they contend that those 10:01:41 3 patents are invalid. 10:01:…x27;re going to see five patents and 10:56:15 5 hear about five patents that are owned by my client…applied for a patent, or even know anybody that's applied 11:07:40 14 for a patent? 11:07:41 | External link to document |
| 2020-08-12 | 491 | Transcript | Mr. Mueller) Again, Mr. Sheasby made the 10:30:51 20 representation: Licensed by essentially…:32 8 What is a patent license? 08:53:33 9 A. A patent -- a patent is a property right much…to all of our patents, 08:53:22 4 paid us a license fee for the use of those patents, and 08:53:…Q. How have the patents that are owned by -- how are the 09:12:25 18 patents that are owned by …reviewed the patents to make sure that 09:13:56 24 they were getting very high quality patents from those | External link to document |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
