Litigation Details for Match Group, LLC v. Bumble Trading Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2018)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Match Group, LLC v. Bumble Trading Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2018)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2018-03-16 |
| Court | District Court, W.D. Texas | Date Terminated | |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Alan D. Albright |
| Jury Demand | Both | Referred To | |
| Parties | BADOO LIMITED; BADOO SOFTWARE LIMITED; BADOO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED; BADOO TRADING LTD.; BUMBLE HOLDING, LTD; BUMBLE TRADING INC.; IAC/INTERACTIVECORP; MAGIC LAB CO.; MATCH GROUP, LLC; WORLDWIDE VISION LIMITED | ||
| Patents | 10,036,037; 10,036,054; 10,046,056; 7,811,254; 8,034,755; 9,005,016; 9,005,056; 9,020,056; 9,024,034; 9,028,005; 9,040,034; 9,040,039; 9,040,049 | ||
| Attorneys | Bo Bryan Jin; Bradley W. Caldwell; Brendan Joseph Hughes; Daniel R. Pearson; Deron R Dacus; Elizabeth L. Stameshkin; Frank Pietrantonio; Hamad M. Hamad; Harrison J Frahn , IV; Jacques Jordan Lamothe; Jeffrey E. Ostrow; John F. Summers; John P. Palmer; Joseph M. Drayton; Judd D. Lauter; Matthew D. Caplan; Max A. Bernstein; Melissa Richards Smith; Michael G. Rhodes; Rose S. Whelan; Samuel K. Whitt; Shane Rumbaugh; Steven D. Wolens; Theodore Stevenson , III; Warren J. McCarty , III | ||
| Firms | Caldwell Cassady & Curry, PC; Cooley LLP; Gillam and Smith LLP; McKool Smith, P.C.; Naman Howell Smith & Lee; Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP; The Dacus Firm, P.C. | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Match Group, LLC v. Bumble Trading Inc.
The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is ⤷ Try a Trial .
Biologic Drugs cited in Match Group, LLC v. Bumble Trading Inc.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for Match Group, LLC v. Bumble Trading Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2018)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-07 | 178 | Answer to Counterclaim | (Non-Infringement of the ’811 Patent) 9. Match incorporates by reference…the Badoo Defendants of infringement of the ’811 Patent. Otherwise Paragraph 11 of the Counterclaims … (Invalidity of the ’811, ’023, and ’854 Patents) …contends that the asserted claims of the ’811, ’023, and ’854 Patents are valid and enforceable and that there… Telephone: (254) 755-4100 7 Case 6:18 | External link to document |
| 2019-06-18 | 97 | Transcript Filed | profiles that are associated with the social 10:36:37 23 networking platform, but the system for…term in the 854 patent. And as your Honor may know, the 09:48:18 18 854 patent, those claims were…side-by-side comparison from the patent office of the 811 09:58:28 7 patent claim and the -- 09:58:30… 52 10:14:11 1 the patent invalid in the patent office when they were 10:14:15 2…that the patent lawsuit is frivolous. There's nothing 10:55:01 12 that the patent lawsuit | External link to document |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
