Litigation Details for MV3 Partners LLC v. Roku, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2018)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
MV3 Partners LLC v. Roku, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2018)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2018-10-16 |
| Court | District Court, W.D. Texas | Date Terminated | |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Alan D. Albright |
| Jury Demand | Plaintiff | Referred To | |
| Parties | MV3 PARTNERS LLC; ROKU, INC. | ||
| Patents | 10,526,657; 6,913,903; 7,012,066; 9,254,308; 9,340,830 | ||
| Attorneys | Alexander J. Hadjis; Andy W. Tindel; Craig D. Cherry; Darcy L. Jones; Darryl Adams; David N. Deaconson; G. Blake Thompson; Gurtej Singh; Heather S. Kim; J. Mark Mann; Jack Shaw; John W. Downing; Jonathan K. Waldrop; Lisa M. Mandrusiak; Marcus A. Barber; Michael D. West; Paul G. Williams; Richard D. Milvenan; ThucMinh Nguyen; Tia D. Fenton; W. Todd Baker | ||
| Firms | Haley & Olson, P.C.; Hogan Lovells US LLP; Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP; Kasowitz Benson Torres, LLP; Kawowitz Benson Torres, LLP; Mann Tindel Thompson; Mann, Tindel & Thompson, Attorneys at Law; Mann, Tindel, Thompson; McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, L.L.P.; Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.; Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP; Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Newstadt, LLP; Pakis, Giotes, Page & Burleson; Slayden Grubert Beard PLLC | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in MV3 Partners LLC v. Roku, Inc.
The small molecule drug covered by the patents cited in this case is ⤷ Try a Trial .
Biologic Drugs cited in MV3 Partners LLC v. Roku, Inc.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for MV3 Partners LLC v. Roku, Inc. (W.D. Tex. 2018)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-22 | 201 | In Limine | Telephone: (903) 657-8540 Facsimile: (903) 657-6003 …assert patent rights without practicing the patent, or suggestions that MV3 was assigned patent rights… 8 relating to patent infringement or the Patent Office – much less the patent-in-suit. Thus, any …involving EVM”); Mars, Inc. v. TruRX LLC, No. 6:13-CV-526-RWS-KNM, 2016 WL 4055675, at *2-3 (E.D. Tex. Apr…and/or pejorative references to MV3 as a patent troll, patent assertion entity, and/or a non-practicing | External link to document |
| 2020-05-19 | 274 | Transcript Filed | 16 October 2018 6:18-cv-00308 830 Patent Plaintiff District Court, W.D…Reporter/Transcriber: Kristie Davis, Telephone number: 254-340-6114. Parties are notified of their duty to review…not electronically noticed Redaction Request due 6/9/2020, Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/19/2020 | External link to document |
| 2019-08-13 | 87 | Exhibit 2 - Roku's Preliminary Invalidity Contentions | 00308-ADA Document 87-3 Filed 08/13/19 Page 7 of 12 66 Nokia N80 User Guide …55, 56, 57, 59, and 61 (Asserted Claims) of U.S. Patent No. 8,863,223. Roku is providing: (1) charts…limited to the technology described in the prior art patents, publications, and manuals identified herein. …charts, each of the asserted claims of the ’223 patent is invalid under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103. Each of…art before the alleged priority date of the ’223 patent. Roku contends that each prior art reference identified | External link to document |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
