Litigation Details for INDIVIOR INC. v. ALVOGEN PINE BROOK, INC. (D.N.J. 2017)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
INDIVIOR INC. v. ALVOGEN PINE BROOK, INC. (D.N.J. 2017)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2017-09-14 |
| Court | District Court, D. New Jersey | Date Terminated | |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Kevin McNulty |
| Jury Demand | None | Referred To | |
| Parties | ALVOGEN PINE BROOK LLC; ALVOGEN PINE BROOK, INC.; AQUESTIVE THERAPEUTICS, INC.; INDIVIOR INC.; INDIVIOR UK LIMITED; MATTHEW J. BECKER | ||
| Patents | 10,357,571; 10,519,211; 6,344,215; 7,579,326; 7,659,254; 7,659,256; 7,772,243; 7,772,267; 7,931,212; 8,349,571; 8,475,832; 8,603,514; 9,084,824; 9,296,687; 9,382,297; 9,579,288; 9,579,305; 9,687,454; 9,752,099; 9,849,099; 9,849,118; 9,931,305; 9,931,336; 9,931,357; 9,931,382 | ||
| Attorneys | AMANDA LYN GENOVESE; ARNOLD B. CALMANN; CHARLES MICHAEL LIZZA; DAVID LEIGH MOSES; JAMIE L. LUCIA; KATHERINE ANN ESCANLAR; KATHERINE HARIHAR; PHILIP SCOTT MAY; WILLIAM C. BATON | ||
| Firms | O'Melveny and Myers LLP; One CityCenter; Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP; Steptoe & Johnson LLP; Troutman Sanders LLP | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in INDIVIOR INC. v. ALVOGEN PINE BROOK, INC.
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Biologic Drugs cited in INDIVIOR INC. v. ALVOGEN PINE BROOK, INC.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for INDIVIOR INC. v. ALVOGEN PINE BROOK, INC. (D.N.J. 2017)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-05 | 215 | film is also covered by Patent No. 8,603,514 (“the ‘514 Patent”). The ‘514 Patent shares the same specification…7111 at DE 250-1). “514 Patent” = United States Patent No. 8,603,514, P1. Ex. C (Dkt. No. 7106 at…and Alvogen. The patents-in-suit are Patent Nos. 9,931,305 (“the ‘305 Patent”), issued to Aquestive…Aquestive. The patent for that film, the ‘514 Patent, was issued on December 10, 2013.2 (‘514 Patent at [45j,…films” in the ‘514 Patent. Id. at 1027. In reviewing the ‘305 Patent and the ‘514 Patent, the Federal Circuit | External link to document | |
| 2019-11-19 | 217 | obtained U.S. Patent Nos. 9,931,305 and 9,687,454 (the “’305 patent” and the “’454 patent,” respectively…events of the above motions. Following a related patent infringement litigation in the District of Delaware…respectively) and subsequently asserted patent infringement claims against DRL and Alvogen in various cases in…Indivior was unlikely to succeed on the merits of its patent infringement claim. Indivior Inc. v. Dr. Reddy’…judgment and forfeiture of various trademarks, patents, assets and receivables. III. DISCUSSION | External link to document | |
| 2020-05-05 | 288 | Order on Motion to Bifurcate | obtained U.S. Patent Nos. 9,931,305 and 9,687,454 (the “’305 patent” and the “’454 patent,” respectively…adjudication. Depomed Inc. v. Purdue Pharma L.P., 13-cv-571 (JAP), 2013 WL 6190380, at *9 (D.N.J. Nov. 26, …for purposes of this opinion. (Dkt No. 7111 at 357; Dkt. No. 7106 at 272.) On January 23, 2020, the …consolidated patent infringement lawsuits brought by Indivior concerning various Suboxone patents. Before… ‘454 patent infringement claim, Defendants’ antitrust counterclaims related to the ‘305 patent will | External link to document |
| 2020-08-24 | 320 | Opinion | U.S. Patent No. 8,475,832 (“the ’832 Patent”). This ’514 Patent and the ’832 Patent are not directly at…DE 250-1). “’832 Patent” = United States Patent No. 8,475,832. …the ’305 Patent and Claim 62 of the ’514 Patent. 5 The ’832 Patent and the ’454 Patent have the…18217 The patents-in-suit are Patent Nos. 9,931,305 (“the ’305 Patent”), issued to Aquestive…film is also covered by Patent No. 8,603,514 (“the ’514 Patent”). The ’514 Patent shares the same specification | External link to document |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
