Get our Free Drug Patent Expiration Updates

Serving hundreds of leading biopharmaceutical companies globally:

Accenture
Daiichi Sankyo
Cipla
AstraZeneca
Cerilliant
Teva
McKesson
Fuji
QuintilesIMS

Generated: December 10, 2018

DrugPatentWatch Database Preview

Litigation Details for Honeywell Intl Inc. v. Apple Computer Inc. (D. Del. 2004)

« Back to Dashboard

Honeywell Intl Inc. v. Apple Computer Inc. (D. Del. 2004)

Docket ➤ Sign Up Date Filed 2004-10-06
Court District Court, D. Delaware Date Terminated 2012-03-30
Cause 28:1338 Patent Infringement Assigned To Leonard Philip Stark
Jury Demand Both Referred To
Parties ALL AROUND CO LTD.; APPLE COMPUTER INC.; ARGUS; ARIMA DISPLAY; AU OPTRONICS CORP.; AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA; AUDIOVOX COMMUNICATIONS CORP.; BEIJING BOE OPTOELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD.; BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP COMPANY LTD.; BOE-HYDIS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD.; CASIO COMPUTER CO., LTD; CASIO INC.; CITIZEN DISPLAYS CO LTD; CITIZEN SYSTEMS AMERICA CORPORATION; CITIZEN SYSTEMS EUROPE; CITIZEN WATCH CO LTD; CONCORD CAMERAS; DELL INC.; EASTMAN KODAK COMP.; FUJIFILM CORPORATION; FUJIFILM USA; FUJITSU AMERICA INC.; FUJITSU COMPUTER PRODUCTS OF AMERICA INC.; FUJITSU LIMITED; HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION; HITACHI DISPLAY DEVICES, LTD.; HITACHI DISPLAYS LTD.; HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA) INC.; HITACHI LTD.; HONEYWELL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, INC.; HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.; HOYA CORPORATION; INNOLUX DISPLAY CORPORATION; INTERNATIONAL DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY; INTERNATIONAL DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY USA INC.; KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.; KYOCERA WIRELESS CORP.; M-DISPLAY OPTRONICS CORP.; MATSUSHITA ELECTRICAL CORPORATION OF AMERICA; MATSUSHITA ELECTRICAL INDUSTRIAL CO.; NAVMAN NZ LIMITED; NAVMAN U.S.A. INC.; NIKON CORPORATION; NIKON INC.; OLYMPUS AMERICA INC.; OLYMPUS CORPORATION; OPTREX AMERICA INC.; PENTAX CORPORATION; PENTAX U.S.A. INC.; PHILIPS CONSUMER ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA; PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION; PICVUE ELECTRONICS LIMITED; QUANTA DISPLAY INC.; SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA INC.; SAMSUNG SDI CO LTD.; SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION; SONY CORP OF AMERICA; SONY CORPORATION; SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA) INC.; SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS AB; SPECIAL MASTER VINCENT J. POPPITI, -SM-; ST LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY CORP.; TOPPOLY OPTOELECTRONICS CORP.; TOSHIBA AMERICA INC.; TOSHIBA CORPORATION; VINCENT J. POPPITI; WINTEK CORP.; WINTEK ELECTRO-OPTICS CORPORATION; WISTRON CORPORATION
Patents 5,164,190; 7,078,058; 7,323,553; 8,022,036
Attorneys Adam Wyatt Poff; Alan M. Grimaldi; Alana A. Prills; Alexander E. Gasser; Andrew M. Ollis; Angie Hankins; Arthur G. Connolly , III; Arthur I. Neustadt; Avelyn M. Ross; Carl E. Schlier; Carolyn E. Morris; Christopher E. Chalsen; Christopher J. Gaspar; Dan C. Hu; David Ellis Moore; David H. Ben-Meir; David J. Margules; Diana M. Sangalli; Donald R. McPhail; Donald W. Huntley; Edward R. Yoches; Elizabeth A. Niemeyer; Elizabeth L. Brann; Evan Olin Williford; Francis DiGiovanni; Frederick L. Cottrell , III; Gerard M. O'Rourke; Glenn Christopher Mandalas; Hamilton Loeb; Hua Chen; Ian G. DiBernardo; Jay C. Chiu; John F. Presper; John M. Caracappa; John M. Seaman; John R. Alison; John T. Johnson; John W. Shaw; Kevin C. Ecker; Kevin M. O'Brien; Lawrence Rosenthal; Matthew W. King; Matthew W. Siegal; Maxwell A. Fox; Monte Terrell Squire; Neil P. Sirota; Nelson M. Kee; Parker H. Bagley; Peter J. Wied; Philip A. Rovner; Richard D. Kelly; Richard L. Horwitz; Robert C. Scheinfeld; Robert J. Katzenstein; Robert Karl Beste , III; Robert L. Maier; Roderick B. Williams; Rose A. Hickman; Sang N. Dang; Stephen S. Korniczky; Steven J Rizzi; Terry D. Garnett; Thomas C. Grimm; Thomas Lee Halkowski; Thomas M. Dunham; Vincent K. Yip; William J. Marsden , Jr.; William J. Wade; York M. Faulkner
Firms Richards, Layton & Finger
Link to Docket External link to docket
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Honeywell Intl Inc. v. Apple Computer Inc.
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ➤ Sign Up , ➤ Sign Up , ➤ Sign Up , and ➤ Sign Up .
Biologic Drugs cited in Honeywell Intl Inc. v. Apple Computer Inc.

The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ➤ Sign Up , ➤ Sign Up , and ➤ Sign Up .

Details for Honeywell Intl Inc. v. Apple Computer Inc. (D. Del. 2004)

Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document
2008-06-13 1059 Exhibits M-T Larry [5J - 8:22, 36:23, …the ’311 patent (and ’072 patent) derived, to avoid U.S. Patent No. 4,840,619 (Hughes Patent). …Magre patent) and United States Patent No. 3,572,334, which disclose every element of ’311 patent’s claims… ’311 patent, col. 3, II. 7-10. Mr. David Utterberg, a co-inventor of the ‘311 patent, owns …19, 20, 22-23 of the ’311 patent, and on claims 1, 6, and 7 of the ’072 patent. 04-1620, 05-1048,-I 052 External link to document
2006-09-19 571 Exhibit J 55.80 20.10 2.44 31-Oct-05 164 190 Occidental Petroleum US 39,860.70…2004 30 March 2012 1:04-cv-01338-LPS Patent Both District Court, D. Delaware External link to document
2006-10-06 599 Exhibit B SINGAPORE (PTE) 本公司之子公司 106,107 7.78 58,654 積極進行催收 1,961 872 … (PTE) 本公司之子公司 106,107 7.78 58,654 積極進行催收 1,961 872 …2004 30 March 2012 1:04-cv-01338-LPS Patent Both District Court, D. Delaware External link to document
Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document

This preview shows a limited data set.
Subscribe to access the full database, or try a Free Trial

For more information try a trial or see the plans and pricing

Serving hundreds of leading biopharmaceutical companies globally:

UBS
Healthtrust
Boehringer Ingelheim
Dow
Cerilliant
Baxter
Queensland Health
Harvard Business School
McKesson

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. thinkBiotech performs no independent verifification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.