Litigation Details for Finjan, Inc. v. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2018)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
Finjan, Inc. v. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2018)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2018-05-03 |
| Court | District Court, N.D. California | Date Terminated | |
| Cause | 15:1126 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | William Horsley Orrick III |
| Jury Demand | Both | Referred To | |
| Parties | CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.; ESET, LLC; ESET, SPOL. S.R.O.; FINJAN, INC.; SOPHOS INC. | ||
| Patents | 10,010,612; 10,010,777; 10,012,213; 10,016,415; 10,213,415; 10,415,014; 6,268,010; 7,001,773; 7,014,990; 7,777,028; 8,008,003; 8,268,008; 8,629,185; 8,685,957; 8,962,685; 9,266,949; 9,266,957; 9,415,004; 9,415,007; 9,415,008; 9,415,009; 9,415,016; 9,415,025; 9,962,373; 9,962,466 | ||
| Attorneys | Alyssa M. Caridis; Amy Kathleen VanZant; Austin W Manes; Clement S. Roberts; Evan David Brewer; Frances Cheever; James R. Hannah; Jason Yu; Justin Edwin Gray; Kathryn Riley Grasso; Kristopher Benjamin Kastens; Laura Michelle Chavkin; Linjun Xu; Lisa Kobialka; Margaret Anne Abernathy; Matthew Herman Poppe; Paul J. Andre; Scott Adam Penner; Vickie L. Feeman; Yuridia Caire | ||
| Firms | DLA Piper US; Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP; Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP; Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP; Orrick Herrington and Sutcliffe LLP; Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP; Rimon P.C.; Yuridia Caire | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Finjan, Inc. v. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc.
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Biologic Drugs cited in Finjan, Inc. v. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc.
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for Finjan, Inc. v. Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2018)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-28 | 264 | Opposition/Response to Motion | 8 Federal Circuit Model Order Limiting Excess Patent Claims and Prior Art], the Patent Local …Holder, 13 640 F.3d 962 (9th Cir. 2011) (per curiam) ....................…v. Holder, 640 F.3d 23 962, 966 (9th Cir. 2011) (per curiam)). If the moving… 12 Perez v. Holder, 640 F.3d 962 (9th Cir. 2011). Finjan does not even acknowledge…; Station Emps., 20 685 F.2d 1065 (9th Cir.1982), 466 U.S. 435 (1984) ... | External link to document |
| 2020-04-21 | 267 | Order on Motion for Certificate of Appealability | 8 under specifications that largely follow the provisions of this District’s Patent Local Rules…only Patent Local Rule 3-1, but also the criteria specified 8 in…for difference.” Couch v. Telescope Inc., 611 F.3d 629, 633 (9th 16 …which amounted to 5,135 charts, totaling to over 185,000 pages. See Order Granting in Part … 13 more than 185,000 pages. SAIC Order at 7. Check Point moved to | External link to document |
| 2020-05-28 | 268 | Stipulation and Proposed Order | Facsimile: (213) 612-2499 15 … 3 May 2018 3:18-cv-02621 Patent Both District Court, N.D. California… Facsimile: (650) 614 7401 FINJAN, INC. 10 … a stipulated 8 dismissal with prejudice. 9 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 11 12 … CHECK POINT SOFTWARE 10 | External link to document |
| 2020-05-29 | 270 | Patent/Trademark Report | Technologies, Inc. 3 May 2018 3:18-cv-02621 Patent Both District Court…HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK TRADEMARK NO. TRADEMARK 1 2 3 4 5 In…HOLDER OF PATENT OR TRADEMARK TRADEMARK NO. TRADEMARK 1 2 3 4 5 In… Case 3:18-cv-02621-WHO Document 270 Filed 05/29/20 Page 1 of 1 AO 120 (Rev. 08/10) (CAND version… Trademarks or ☒ Patents. (☐ the patent action involves 35 U.S.C. § 292.): | External link to document |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
