Litigation Details for DivX, LLC v. Hulu, LLC (C.D. Cal. 2019)
✉ Email this page to a colleague
DivX, LLC v. Hulu, LLC (C.D. Cal. 2019)
| Docket | ⤷ Try a Trial | Date Filed | 2019-03-05 |
| Court | District Court, C.D. California | Date Terminated | 2020-05-11 |
| Cause | 35:271 Patent Infringement | Assigned To | Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Jury Demand | Plaintiff | Referred To | Douglas F. McCormick |
| Parties | DIVX, LLC; HULU, LLC | ||
| Patents | 10,588,844; 7,410,945; 7,943,310; 8,900,588; 9,316,647; 9,340,612; 9,498,528 | ||
| Attorneys | Aaron R Fahrenkrog; Aaron Shawn Thompson; Andrew M Holmes; Brian P Biddinger; Bryan J Mechell; Christopher A Seidl; Daniel Lewis Allender; David A Perlson; David M Stein; Emily J Tremblay; Erin Greenfield Mehta; James M Dowd; Jason Francis Choy; Jason H Liss; Joseph Taylor Gooch; Keith T Howell; Lance L Yang; Mary Pheng; Mary V Sooter; Rajin S Olson; Roman M Silberfeld; Samantha K Picans; Shui Li; Valerie Anne Lozano; William E Manske | ||
| Firms | Greenberg Gross LLP; Hulu LLC; Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP; Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP; Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges LLP; Robins Kaplan LLP; Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP; Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP; Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale & Dorr, LLP | ||
| Link to Docket | External link to docket | ||
Biologic Drugs cited in DivX, LLC v. Hulu, LLC
The biologic drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , ⤷ Try a Trial , and ⤷ Try a Trial .
Details for DivX, LLC v. Hulu, LLC (C.D. Cal. 2019)
| Date Filed | Document No. | Description | Snippet | Link To Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-26 | 113 | Stay Case | 8,472,792 (the “’792 patent”), 9,270,720 (the “’720 patent”), 9,998,515 (the 23 “’515 patent”), 10,212,486… March 11, 2020 (IPR2020-00647) 21 9,998,515 1-4, 6, 8, 10, 13, … on February 6, 2020. For the 9 ’792 and ’515 patents, the petition challenges all but one… March 9, 2016) (Gutierrez, J.). 23 B. Courts Have The Authority To Stay Patent Litigation…infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,295,673 (the “’673 patent”), 8,139,651 (the “’651 22 patent”), 8,472,792 | External link to document |
| 2020-04-27 | 115 | Response in Opposition to Motion | 12 U.S. Patent No. 10,225,588 (Dkt. 59-7) ’588 patent or ’588 …Entertainment USA, Inc., 844 F. Supp. 1378, 10 1381 (N.D. Cal. … 10 U.S. Patent No. 9,998,515 (Dkt. 59-5) ’515 patent or ’515 R OBINS K APLAN… 11 U.S. Patent No. 10,212,486 (Dkt. 59-6) ’486 patent or ’486 A TTORNEYS…why Hulu adopted DivX’s patented 10 technologies and leveraged | External link to document |
| 2020-05-11 | 122 | Stay Case | the completion of co-pending patent office proceedings. See ASCII, 844 F. Supp. at 1380. Second, and… 2020 September 2020 10,225,588 Yes Yes …. STD Entm’t USA, Inc., 844 F. Supp. 1378, 1380 (N.D. Cal. 1994). CV-90 (10/08) …infringement for that asserted patent.” Netflix Mot. 1 n.1. CV-90 (10/08) …defend its patents with objective considerations of non- obviousness. CV-90 (10/08) | External link to document |
| >Date Filed | >Document No. | >Description | >Snippet | >Link To Document |
