DrugPatentWatch Database Preview
Join the DrugPatentWatch Referral Program Get access to a free drug patent landscape report or a free one-month subscription
« Back to Dashboard
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Applied Research Systems ARS Holding, N v. v. Cell Genesys, Inc.
Biologic Drugs cited in Applied Research Systems ARS Holding, N v. v. Cell Genesys, Inc.
|Date Filed||Document No.||Description||Snippet||Link To Document|
|2006-03-16||101||Exhibit A, Part I||produced? 3 (Marked, Exhibit 2664, U.S. Patent 4 A. No. 4 5,240,832.) 5 Q. Prior to the time that you arrived…detect the 6 you Exhibit 2084, which is U.S. Patent 5,240,832; is 7 presence of the protein “l“SI-l beta…Right. But the patent application was in 11 Q. When did you start preparing your patent 11 preparation…product? l 3 neophyte in the area of patent sti§)rnissionf a patent 3 A. Uitimate§y. In a commercial sense… no issued patent 8 Q. Weii, there wouldn't be a likelihood of 9 Q. Was there a patent application||External link to document|
|2006-03-23||103||Opposition to Motion||only recently learned of U.S. Patent No. 5,240,832 (“the ‘832 patent”) or of Ms. Kelton’s co-inventorship…experiments reflected in the ‘071 patent” all involved TSH. See, e.g., ‘071 patent at col. 13, lines 22-25 (“…in the experiments reported in the patent. See, e.g., ‘071 patent at col. 13, lines 58-61 (“In this example…the ‘832 patent. (Exhibit D to Nielsen Decl.) And CGI, not ARS, introduced the ‘832 patent as an exhibit…inequitable conduct during the prosecution of the ‘071 patent. As explained in ARS’s motion to dismiss (filed||External link to document|
|2006-08-03||122||Response||art to ARS (but not CGI)) and U.S. Patent 5,464,’764 and U.S. Patent 5,50l,967 each of which anticipates…applicant to a patent shall authorize the Director to issue such patent on the filing in the Patent and Tradernarl…party cannot present a claim patentable to it that interferes with a patentable claim of the opposing party… Board of Patent Appeals and lnterferences shall . . . determine priority and patentability of invention… a facially invalid patent The Board, by resolving both priority and patentability, when these questions||External link to document|
|2006-10-02||126||Memorandum of Law||U.S. Patent 5,240,832 and Scott Chappel's testimony with respect to the same. rl`his patent, like… modify a cell line to express THSB. U.S. Patent 5,240,832 (Ex. C to Kelber Dec.) recites “The expression…testified that his prior art teaching in U.S. Patent 5,240,832 reflects the fact that use of a selectable…subject matter claimed in ARS’s ‘071 patent Which stands patentable to ARS over prior art teachings of …directed to the “same patentable invention as claims 3, 37 and 46 of ARS’s ‘071 patent.” Decision, page l32||External link to document|
|2006-10-02||127||Declaration||U.S. Patent 5,024,939. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy ofU.S. Patent 5,240,832…(Tlsty Expert Report-Part 2)# (3) Exhibit B (US Patent '939)# (4) Exhibit C (US Paten '832)#…CGI and a claim of ARS not found by the Board of Patent Appeais and Interferences in Interference 105,§||External link to document|
|2006-11-22||144||Response||modify a cell line to express Tl-lSB. U.S. Patent 5,240,832 recites: “The expression vector also contained…the ‘939 patent, one of four references relied upon for motivation, is “new.” rl`he ‘939 patent is not … genes, well before the ‘071 patent was ever made the subject of a patent application Chappel l`ranscript… and an amplifiable gene, Yet, the ‘07l patent, the ARS patent involved in the interference itself, specifically… between CGI Claiin 106 and any claim ofthe ARS patent invoived that Was not found by the Board to be||External link to document|
|2007-10-01||180||Memorandum of Law||to modify a cell line to express THSB. U.S. Patent 5,240,832 recites “The expression vector also contained…testified that his prior art teaching in U.S. Patent 5,240,832 reflects the fact that use of a selectable…subject matter claimed in ARS’s ‘071 patent Which stands patentable to ARS over prior art teachings of …directed to the “same patentable invention as claims 3, 37 and 46 ofARS’s ‘07 l patent.” Decision, page 132…relies herein on U.S. Patents 5,328,820, prior art with respect to the ARS ‘071 patent at issue, which was||External link to document|
|>Date Filed||>Document No.||>Description||>Snippet||>Link To Document|