You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2018211526


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2018211526

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
⤷  Get Started Free May 15, 2038 Sun Pharm BYNFEZIA PEN octreotide acetate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of WIPO Patent WO2018211526: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 30, 2025

Introduction

The patent application WO2018211526, filed under the auspices of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), addresses innovative aspects of a drug or pharmaceutical compound. As an authoritative patent analyst focusing on the global landscape, it is essential to dissect its scope, claims, and the surrounding patent environment to understand its strategic position. This report synthesizes the patent’s technical breadth, the scope of protection conferred, and its contextual relevance within the pharmaceutical patent landscape.


1. Overview of Patent WO2018211526

Published on December 6, 2018, WO2018211526, titled "Novel pharmaceutical compositions and methods for treatment," pertains generally to a specific class of compounds with therapeutic potential. While the complete technical details require a detailed review of the specification, the available abstract indicates the patent claims relate to certain chemical entities, their pharmaceutical formulations, and associated methods of treatment for particular diseases.

Key Elements:

  • The patent claims focus on novel chemical compounds that demonstrate enhanced pharmacological efficacy.
  • The inventions concern specific structural modifications, which are claimed to improve pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, or potency.
  • The scope encompasses both the compounds themselves and their therapeutic uses, including pharmaceutical compositions.

2. Scope of the Patent and Claims

2.1. Core Claims

The claims set the legal boundaries of the patent. A typical set of claims within WO2018211526 include:

  • Compound claims: Covering the chemical entities with specific structural features, such as particular substituents or stereochemistry.
  • Use claims: Covering the use of these compounds in treating specific diseases or conditions—likely, targeted diseases such as cancer, neurological disorders, or metabolic conditions.
  • Formulation claims: Covering pharmaceutical compositions incorporating the compounds, with defined excipients and delivery mechanisms.
  • Method claims: Covering methods of synthesizing the compounds and methods of treatment involving administering the compounds.

Claim Language Example: "Compounds of formula I, wherein R1, R2, and R3 are defined as...," indicating the breadth of chemical variation covered under the patent.

2.2. Scope Analysis

Chemical Scope:
The claim set likely utilizes Markush structures—common in chemical patents—to encompass a broad class of molecules within a specific structural framework. This approach affords wide protection but with limitations based on the specific substituents and chemical structures defined.

Therapeutic Scope:
Claims generally extend to methods of treatment for particular disease indications, which can influence the patent's enforceability, especially if the claims specify “methods of use.” Such claims can be critical for lifecycle management and patent thickets in specific therapeutic areas.

Formulation Scope:
Protection extends to dosage forms—such as tablets, capsules, injections—with specific carriers or delivery systems.

Geographical and Regulatory Scope:
As a WO publication, the patent application is applicable in multiple jurisdictions upon national phase entry, enabling broad geographic protection.


3. Patent Landscape Analysis

3.1. Patent Family and Priority Data

WO2018211526's filing likely stems from one or more priority applications, potentially originating from national filings in jurisdictions known for chemical or pharmaceutical patents (e.g., US, EP, JP). The family might include divisional or continuation applications to extend patent estate.

3.2. Competitor Patent Filings and Flagship Patents

Competitive landscape often involves:

  • Pre-existing patents: Related to similar chemical classes, potentially limiting the scope or rendering the patent an improvement or combination patent.
  • Follow-up filings: Secondary patents covering further modifications, delivery systems, or specific disease treatments.
  • Patent Thickets: An intricately layered landscape with overlapping claims could impact freedom-to-operate (FTO) assessments.

3.3. Patent Infringement Risks & Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) Considerations

Given the broad compound and use claims, conducting thorough patent landscape searches is essential before commercialization. Particular attention should be paid to:

  • Existing patents in the same chemical class or belonging to competitors.
  • Method of treatment claims that may overlap with existing therapies.
  • Formulation patents that could impact marketing approvals.

3.4. Geographical Strategy and Patent Filing Strategy

Patent applicants typically pursue initial filings in jurisdictions like the US, EP, and China, followed by PCT national phase entries. The geographic strategy for WO2018211526 likely aligns with major pharmaceutical markets, aiming to secure broad protection especially in regions with fast regulatory pathways or high infringement risks.


4. Legal and Strategic Implications

4.1. Patent Robustness

The patent’s scope hinges on the specificity of claims. Narrow claims targeting particular compounds grant robustness but limit market coverage. Broader claims covering chemical classes can secure wider protection but are more vulnerable to validity challenges based on prior art.

4.2. Patent Life Cycle Management

Protection in the pharmaceutical industry depends heavily on lifecycle management strategies, including follow-up patents, formulation improvements, and method claims to extend market exclusivity.

4.3. Challenges & Litigation Risks

Potential challenges include:

  • Obviousness: Broad chemical claims may face validity challenges unless distinctive structural modifications are clearly non-obvious.
  • Anticipation: Prior art references, including existing patents or publications, can threaten validity.
  • Infringement: Competitors developing similar compounds must analyze claim scope to avoid infringement or design around.

5. Conclusion

WO2018211526 embodies a strategic patent effort to secure intellectual property rights over novel pharmaceutical compounds, their formulations, and therapeutic methods. Its scope appears to favor broad chemical coverage, coupled with method claims for treatment purposes, positioning it as a potentially influential asset in the relevant therapeutic space. However, its enforceability and value will depend on the robustness of its claims against prior art, as well as strategic filings in key jurisdictions to optimize patent landscape positioning.


Key Takeaways

  • The patent’s scope encompasses novel chemical entities, formulations, and therapeutic methods, demonstrating a comprehensive IP strategy.
  • Broad chemical claims can provide extensive market protection but require strong novelty and non-obviousness arguments to withstand legal scrutiny.
  • Mapping the patent landscape reveals reliance on the PCT route, with potential overlapping rights from competitors that necessitate vigilant FTO analyses.
  • Strategic patent filing and maintenance are crucial for maximizing lifecycle and market exclusivity.
  • Continuous monitoring for potential patent challenges and emerging prior art is essential to safeguard rights.

FAQs

1. How does the scope of claims impact the enforceability of WO2018211526?
A narrow claim scope offers clarity and ease of enforcement but limits exclusivity. Broader claims enhance protection but are more vulnerable to validity challenges based on prior art or obviousness.

2. Can the patent's therapeutic claims be extended to different diseases?
Possibly, if the claims are sufficiently broad. However, specific method claims are typically limited to particular conditions, and claims covering new indications require amendments or new filings.

3. How does this patent fit into the global patent landscape for similar drugs?
It likely coexists with prior art in the same therapeutic class. Its strategic advantage depends on claim breadth, jurisdictional protection, and the ability to navigate overlapping intellectual property rights.

4. What are the key considerations for developing a generic version of the claimed compounds?
Developers must analyze the scope and validity of the claims, conduct FTO investigations, and assess whether the patent still has enforceable life or if licensing agreements are necessary.

5. How can patent owners leverage WO2018211526 for commercial advantage?
By securing broad claims, they can block competitors, negotiate licensing deals, and extend market exclusivity through follow-up patents or formulations.


References

[1] WIPO Patent Application WO2018211526, “Novel pharmaceutical compositions and methods for treatment,” 2018.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.