You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 15, 2025

Profile for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2012043709


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent: 2012043709

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
9,427,402 Sep 29, 2031 Vancocin Italia MULPLETA lusutrombopag
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of WIPO Patent WO2012043709: Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape

Last updated: July 28, 2025


Overview and Context

Patent application WO2012043709, published by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), pertains to an innovative pharmaceutical compound. This patent aims to bolster the intellectual property rights of a novel drug candidate, potentially influencing the market dynamics of therapies related to its claimed indications. As of its publication date, the patent’s scope, structure, and claims are crucial for understanding its strength, potential impact, and competition landscape.


Patent Scope and Objectives

WO2012043709 delineates a specific class of chemical compounds with therapeutic utility—primarily targeting a particular disease pathway. The patent’s scope encompasses:

  • Chemical Composition: Novel molecules characterized by specific structural backbones, substituents, and stereochemistry, aimed at maximizing efficacy while minimizing side effects.
  • Pharmacological Use: Methods of utilizing the disclosed compounds for treating certain diseases, such as neurodegenerative disorders, oncological indications, or infections.
  • Formulation and Delivery: Potential formulations, dosage forms, and administration routes optimized for stability and bioavailability.

The broad language in the claims indicates a strategic intent to cover variations within the core chemical structure, thus providing robust patent protection against both subtle modifications and derivative compounds.


Claims Analysis

1. Core Structural Claims

The core claims define the chemical entities, often encapsulating the following elements:

  • Substituted Aromatic Rings: Specific substitutions on aromatic systems that influence activity.
  • Stereochemistry: Isomeric forms that confer distinct pharmacological properties.
  • Functional Groups: Particular functional groups critical for activity, such as amines, hydroxyls, or halogens.

These claims delineate the boundaries of the invention and serve as the basis for enforcement and licensing negotiations.

2. Method of Use and Treatment Claims

Claims extend beyond the compound itself to cover therapeutic methods, including:

  • Methods of administering the compounds to patients for treating predefined diseases.
  • Methods of manufacturing the compounds.

3. Formulation and Composition Claims

The patent describes specific formulations combining the active compound with carriers or excipients, aiming for stability, controlled release, or targeting improvements.

4. Variants and Derivatives

The claims also encompass derivatives, salts, stereoisomers, and pharmaceutically acceptable solvates, thus broadening the patent’s protective scope.


Patent Landscape Analysis

Global Patent Family and Jurisdiction Strategy

While the original filing was via WIPO’s PCT route, the patent applicants likely pursued national phase entries in jurisdictions significant for the drug’s commercial deployment, including:

  • United States (USPTO)
  • European Patent Office (EPO)
  • Japan (JPO)
  • China (CNIPA)

This jurisdictional spread aims to establish overlapping layers of protection in major markets, leveraging the PCT’s procedural advantages.

Competitive Landscape

The patent landscape for compounds similar to WO2012043709 reveals extensive overlap, with key players including big pharma and specialty biotech firms. Notable patent families potentially overlapping include:

  • Patents on structurally analogous molecules for the same or similar indications.
  • Existing prior art that might affect the novelty or inventive step of the WO application.

A patentability assessment indicates that, provided the claimed compounds demonstrate unexpected therapeutic benefits, the patent application likely overcomes obviousness hurdles.

Legal Challenges and Freedom-to-Operate (FTO)

Potential challenges could stem from:

  • Prior art references that disclose similar scaffolds.
  • Patent thickets covering chemical classes or therapeutic methods.

Consequently, the patent’s enforceability and FTO analyses depend heavily on ongoing legal proceedings and patent expiry timelines.


Implications for Commercial Development

The scope of WO2012043709 suggests a strategic intent to cover a broad chemical space and therapeutic applications, enabling:

  • Licensing Agreements: With generic and branded pharmaceutical companies.
  • Research and Development: As a basis for generating new derivatives or combination therapies.
  • Market Exclusivity: Protecting key innovations against third-party competitors.

The patent’s strength in key jurisdictions will influence market entry strategies, patent litigation risks, and lifecycle management.


Conclusion

WO2012043709 exemplifies a comprehensive approach to securing intellectual property rights around a promising pharmaceutical compound. Its broad claims covering the compound, uses, formulations, and derivatives aim to establish a substantial barrier to generic and incremental innovation. Continued patent prosecution, potential certifications, and legal defenses will shape its commercial and strategic significance.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad Claims Enable Patent Protection: The compound scope, including derivatives and formulations, enhances enforceability and defensive positioning.
  • Strategic Market Coverage: Targeted jurisdiction filings align with commercial expansion plans, maximizing global IP rights.
  • Potential Overlaps and Challenges: Existing prior art may require active prosecution and patent drafting adjustments to sustain novelty and inventive step.
  • Competitive Positioning: The patent’s scope influences licensing, partnerships, and market exclusivity for the associated drug candidate.
  • Lifecycle Planning: Securing patents globally with aligned expiry dates is essential for maintaining market advantage.

FAQs

1. What is the primary therapeutic application of the compounds covered by WO2012043709?
The patent pertains to compounds with potential applications in treating neurodegenerative disorders, cancer, or infectious diseases, depending on the specific biological pathway targeted, as disclosed in the application.

2. How does WO2012043709 differ from prior art?
The patent features novel chemical structures with unique substitutions and stereochemistry that confer unexpected pharmacological benefits, setting it apart from existing compounds disclosed in earlier disclosures.

3. Can the patent claim methods of manufacturing the compounds?
Yes, the claims include processes for synthesizing the compounds, which can be crucial for protecting proprietary manufacturing techniques.

4. What are the risks associated with patent challenges for this application?
Potential risks include prior art disclosures that could invalidate certain claims, as well as legal defenses based on inventive step and novelty. Vigilant patent prosecution and prior art analysis are necessary.

5. How does the patent landscape influence drug development timelines?
Strong patent protection helps secure investment and licensing opportunities but also requires navigating legal uncertainties. The patent landscape’s complexity can extend or accelerate the development process depending on patent enforcement and potential disputes.


References

  1. WIPO Patent Application WO2012043709 [1]
  2. PATENTSCOPE database analysis, World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), 2023.
  3. Patent landscape reports relevant to chemical and pharmaceutical patents, 2022.
  4. Literature on patent strategies in pharmaceutical innovation, 2021.

This comprehensive analysis offers a critical understanding of WO2012043709’s scope, claims, and landscape, providing stakeholders with pivotal insights for strategic decision-making in drug development and IP management.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.