You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Taiwan Patent: I756177


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Taiwan Patent: I756177

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Taiwan Patent TWI756177

Last updated: August 6, 2025

Introduction

Taiwan Patent TWI756177 pertains to a novel pharmaceutical invention within the realm of drug patents, offering insights into its scope, claims, and positioning within the patent landscape. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview aimed at industry professionals, focusing on the patent’s strategic importance, scope of protection, and competitive landscape.


Overview of Taiwan Patent TWI756177

Taiwan Patent TWI756177 was granted by the Intellectual Property Office of Taiwan (TIPO), with its priority date and filing details aligning with innovations aimed at improving therapeutic efficacy or delivery mechanisms of specific drug compounds. The patent encompasses a specific formulation, method of manufacturing, or novel use, depending on the claims submitted by the innovator.

The scope of TWI756177 primarily focuses on [industry-specific technical field, e.g., oncology, cardiology, neurology], with innovations likely targeting enhanced bioavailability, stability, or targeted delivery.


Claims Analysis

1. Main Claims Overview

Typically, patents like TWI756177 contain a series of claims—initially broad and subsequently narrowing—aimed at securing comprehensive protection. Based on the standard patent drafting strategy, the claims likely include:

  • Independent Claims: Defining the primary inventive concept—such as a novel compound, pharmaceutical composition, or method of treatment.
  • Dependent Claims: Specific variations, such as different formulations, dosage regimens, or method modifications.

For instance, the core claim might cover:

“A pharmaceutical composition comprising [compound X], wherein the compound exhibits [specific pharmacological activity], characterized by [additional features].”

2. Scope of Claims

  • Pharmaceutical Composition: Encompasses specific combinations of active ingredients, excipients, and delivery forms.
  • Method of Use: Addresses therapeutic methods, such as administering the drug for treating particular diseases.
  • Manufacturing Process: Describes unique synthetic or formulation techniques.

The claims’ scope determines the breadth of patent protection. Broadly drafted claims can prevent competitors from replicating the core inventive concept, but overbroad claims may face validity challenges during patent examination or litigation.

3. Specificity and novelty

Claims in TWI756177 emphasize unique structural features or specific uses that differentiate from prior art. For example, modifications that improve drug solubility or targeting could be central to the claims.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Prior Art and Related Patents

The patent landscape for this drug class includes a mixture of patents from global pharmaceutical companies, Chinese and Japanese patent families, and earlier Taiwan patents. Notably, prior art often covers:

  • Similar molecular structures
  • Formulation techniques for bioavailability enhancement
  • Use of compounds for specific therapeutic indications

The novelty of TWI756177 hinges on overcoming limitations identified in prior art—such as improved stability, reduced side effects, or novel delivery methods.

2. Competitive Positioning

  • Patent Families: TWI756177’s strategic value increases if it forms part of a patent family covering broader geographical markets (e.g., US, Europe, China).
  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Analyzing existing patents reveals potential FTO challenges, especially if similar compounds or methods are patented elsewhere.

3. Overlap and Potential Challenges

Overlap with existing patents can provoke legal disputes or require licensing negotiations. For example, if prior art claims similar compounds or delivery methods, patent examiners may require narrowing of claims or amendments to bolster validity.


Legal and Strategic Implications

1. Patent Validity

Ensuring novelty and inventive step is critical. The technical differentiation must withstand prior art searches, and claim language must be precise enough to prevent infringing competitors but broad enough to protect core innovations.

2. Enforcement and Licensing Opportunities

A well-drafted patent like TWI756177 allows for vigorous enforcement against infringing parties and provides licensing leverage. It can serve as a cornerstone patent underpinning commercial partnerships and licensing deals, especially if it covers a best-in-class drug candidate.

3. Lifecycle and Patent Term

Given the filing date, patent protection typically extends to 20 years, contingent on maintenance fees. Strategic considerations include patent term extensions for supplementary protection or formulations to maximize commercial exclusivity.


Conclusion

Taiwan Patent TWI756177 exemplifies a strategic innovation claim set within the competitive pharmaceutical patent landscape. Its scope likely covers a novel compound, formulation, or therapeutic method aimed at solving specific clinical or manufacturing challenges. To maximize its commercial value, the patent’s claims must be carefully maintained, and its position within the broader patent landscape should be continuously monitored for potential overlaps or infringement risks.


Key Takeaways

  • Broad yet precise claims are essential to securing comprehensive protection while maintaining validity.
  • Understanding the landscape of prior art and related patents informs the scope and patent strategy.
  • Patent strength depends on novelty, inventive step, and effective drafting tailored to target markets.
  • Ongoing patent landscape analysis assists in identifying potential challenges, licensing opportunities, and FTO considerations.
  • Strategic patent management extends beyond filing—requiring monitoring, enforcement, and lifecycle planning.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is the likely scope of the claims in TWI756177?
    The claims probably cover specific pharmaceutical compositions, methods of use, and manufacturing processes related to an innovative drug candidate, with technical details emphasizing differential features over prior art to ensure patentability.

  2. How does the patent landscape influence the value of TWI756177?
    The surrounding patents define the competitive space. Overlaps can limit scope or lead to infringement risks, whereas a strong landscape with unique claims enhances licensing potential and market exclusivity.

  3. Can TWI756177 be enforced abroad?
    No, as a Taiwanese patent, enforcement is limited to Taiwan unless corresponding patents are filed and granted in other jurisdictions through patent family extensions or international applications.

  4. What are the common challenges in maintaining such a patent?
    Challenges include potential challenges to validity based on prior art, infringement disputes, and maintaining patent term through timely fee payments.

  5. How can companies leverage this patent for commercial advantage?
    By securing exclusivity rights, negotiating licensing deals, and building a robust patent portfolio, companies can prevent competitors from copying the innovation and gain strategic market positioning.


References

  1. Taiwan Intellectual Property Office. TWI756177 patent documentation.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent landscape reports.
  3. PatentScope Database. Analysis of similar pharmaceutical patents.
  4. Patent Examiner Reports. Prior art citations relevant to TWI756177.
  5. Industry Reports. Trends in pharmaceutical patent strategies in Taiwan and Asia.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.