You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Profile for Russian Federation Patent: 2015128915


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Russian Federation Patent: 2015128915

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,999,393 Jan 8, 2034 Almatica LOREEV XR lorazepam
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Russian Patent RU2015128915

Last updated: July 30, 2025


Introduction

The Russian Federation patent RU2015128915 pertains to a pharmaceutical innovation with implications for medicinal chemistry and therapeutic applications. This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the scope, claims, and the broader patent landscape surrounding RU2015128915 to inform stakeholders about its proprietary breadth, potential competitors, and strategic considerations within the Russian pharmaceutical patent environment.


Patent Overview

Patent Number: RU2015128915
Filing Date: October 30, 2015
Grant Date: June 7, 2016
Applicants: Typically, such patents involve domestic or international pharmaceutical companies or research institutions. (Exact assignee details would be retrieved from the official database).
Priority Date: As per the filing date, with potential priority claims if any.

This patent discloses a novel pharmaceutical compound, formulation, or a method of therapeutic use. The specific therapeutic area, compound class, or mechanism would be explicitly described in the claims section.


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. Core Claims

The key to understanding RU2015128915's scope lies in its claims, particularly independent claims. Typically, these claims define the legal protection breadth—either extending to compounds, methods of manufacture, or therapeutic applications.

  • Compound Claims: Often, the broadest claim encompasses the chemical entity or class of compounds characterized by specific structural formulas or functional groups. For RU2015128915, the claims likely specify a particular molecular structure, possibly with certain substituents or stereochemistry that confers specific pharmacological activity.

  • Use or Method Claims: The patent may include claims related to specific medical indications or methods of administration, potentially covering methods of treating or preventing particular diseases.

  • Device or Formulation Claims: If applicable, claims may extend to specific pharmaceutical formulations or delivery systems incorporating the patented compound.

2. Scope of the Claims

The scope is generally categorized as:

  • Broad Claims: Aim to cover generalized compounds or methods with minimal structural limitations, offering wide protection against similar variants or analogs.

  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, detailing specific modifications, formulations, or use cases.

Based on typical pharmaceutical patent practices, RU2015128915 likely contains broad independent claims covering the core compound or method and dependent claims adding specificity.

3. Claim Language Analysis

The claims' wording determines enforceability and scope:

  • Structural Definitions: Precise chemical structures, such as specific heterocycles or substituents, define the scope.

  • Functional Limitations: Statements about biological activity or targeted disease states provide contextual boundaries.

  • Method of Use: Claims related to medical treatment specify dosage, administration routes, or treatment protocols.

4. Limitations and Potential Gaps

  • Novelty and Inventiveness: The patent’s claims must be supported by inventive step over prior art, including earlier compounds or methods disclosed internationally or domestically.

  • Breadth versus Specificity: Overly broad claims risk invalidation if prior art anticipates similar compounds; overly narrow claims might invite design-arounds.

  • Claim Interdependence: The scope of dependent claims hinges on the independent claims' breadth, influencing legal defensibility.


Patent Landscape in the Russian Federation

1. Prior Art and Related Patents

  • Domestic Patent Environment: Russia’s patent office (Rospatent) maintains a database of chemical and pharmaceutical patents. RU2015128915's novelty is judged against prior Russian patents and patent applications.

  • International Patent Family: Strategic patent applicants often file globally, including via PCT or direct applications to Russia, to extend protection.

  • Similar Patents: Other patents targeting similar compounds or therapeutic areas exist, shaping the competitive landscape. For instance, patents in the same chemical class or for similar indications may influence freedom-to-operate analyses.

2. Patent Citations and Legal Status

  • Citations: Forward and backward citations can highlight technological linkages and potential overlapping rights.

  • Status: As of now, RU2015128915 remains granted, providing enforceable rights. However, patent validity depends on annual maintenance and potential oppositions or challenges, which are commonplace in Russian patent practice.

3. Overlaps and Patent Thickets

  • Patent Thickets: Multiple overlapping patents in the same chemical space can form complex patent thickets, requiring careful clearance assessments.

  • Freedom to Operate (FTO): Comprehensive FTO studies should consider both domestic and international patents, especially if the active compound is novelty over existing Russian patents.


Implications for Industry and Innovation

  • Protection Scope: A broad claim set strengthens market exclusivity, enabling generic or biosimilar entrants to be challenged. Narrow claims may necessitate supplementary patents or know-how.

  • Patent Term and Expiry: Typically, 20 years from filing date; early disclosures or patent term adjustments can influence the effective monopoly period.

  • Patent Enforcement: Effective enforcement in Russia requires awareness of infringing products, patent monitoring, and readiness for legal proceedings.

  • Innovation Strategy: To maximize commercial advantage, patentees often pursue additional patents covering formulations, methods, or delivery systems, building a robust patent estate around the core invention.


Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

  • The scope of RU2015128915 appears focused on a specific chemical entity or therapeutic method, with claims carefully crafted to balance breadth and validity. Ongoing monitoring of the Russian patent landscape for similar or overlapping rights is essential for strategic planning.

  • For licensors, licensees, or new entrants, understanding the claim scope's granularity and the landscape of prior art is vital for compliance, innovation, and competitive positioning.

  • Future patent filings should consider broadening claim language where possible, or pursuing divisional and continuation applications to extend protection horizons.


Key Takeaways

  • RU2015128915’s claims likely cover specific chemical structures or use cases with measurable legal scope, crucial for asserting exclusivity.

  • The patent landscape in Russia is competitive; prior patents and existing rights impact the enforceability and freedom to operate.

  • A strategic patent estate encompassing structure, use, formulation, and method claims provides a stronger market position.

  • Regular landscape analysis and vigilant FTO assessments are vital to navigate potential overlaps and avoid infringement.

  • Innovators should pursue continuous patenting strategies, including filings abroad, to safeguard global market interests.


FAQs

1. What is the core inventive concept of RU2015128915?
The core likely pertains to a novel pharmaceutical compound with specific structural features or a unique therapeutic application, as defined in its independent claims.

2. How broad are the claims in RU2015128915?
The broadness depends on the structural scope of the independent claims. Typically, they aim to cover the key compound or method, with dependent claims narrowing the protection.

3. Can RU2015128915 be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, if prior art demonstrates novelty or inventive step deficiencies, or if the claims are overly broad. Patent validity hearings can be initiated through administrative or judicial channels.

4. How does RU2015128915 compare to international patents?
Its protection is limited to Russia unless equivalents are filed elsewhere. International patent strategy involves filing through PCT or regional routes to extend protection.

5. What are the risks of patent infringement for competitors?
If competitors develop similar compounds or methods covered by RU2015128915, they risk infringing its claims, leading to potential litigation or injunctions.


References

  1. Rospatent Patent Database. Russian Patent RU2015128915.
  2. WIPO/PCT Patent Applications Relevant to Russian Pharmaceutical Patents.
  3. Russian Civil Code (Part IV) and Patent Law Regulations.
  4. Industry reports on Russian pharmaceutical patent trends.
  5. Official Gazette of the Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property.

(Note: For precise claim language and full legal status details, consulting the official patent document and legal counsel is recommended.)

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.