You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: Upgrade for Complete Access

Last Updated: December 19, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2014016114


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2014016114

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
11,085,043 Jun 22, 2032 Jazz Pharms Inc DEFITELIO defibrotide sodium
11,236,328 Jun 22, 2032 Jazz Pharms Inc DEFITELIO defibrotide sodium
11,746,348 Jun 22, 2032 Jazz Pharms Inc DEFITELIO defibrotide sodium
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape of Mexico Patent MX2014016114

Last updated: July 29, 2025


Introduction

Mexico Patent MX2014016114 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention whose scope, claims, and related patent landscape determine its enforceability, territorial strength, and competitive positioning within the Mexican market and potentially beyond. Understanding this patent's intricacies is vital for stakeholders, including generic manufacturers, pharma innovators, and licensing entities, aiming to navigate or challenge its rights effectively.


Patent Overview and Basic Data

  • Patent Number: MX2014016114
  • Filing Date: Likely around 2014-2015 (based on the patent number prefix format, recognizing the Mexican patent system's numbering conventions).
  • Issue Date: Approximate, possibly 2015-2016.
  • Patent Type: Utility patent (most pharmaceuticals fall under utility patents in Mexico).
  • Patent Term: 20 years from filing, subject to maintenance.

(Exact dates require consulting the IMPI database, but for this analysis, assumptions are based on typical timelines and available data).


Scope and Claims Analysis

1. The Claims: Core to Patent Protection

The claims define the legal boundaries of the patent's rights. They outline what the patent owner considers their invention and where infringement occurs. Analyzing the claims of MX2014016114 involves examining:

  • Independent Claims: Broad, defining the invention's essential features.
  • Dependent Claims: Narrower, adding specific limitations or embodiments.

a) Nature of the Claims

While the precise wording needs review of the official patent document, typical pharmaceutical patents cover:

  • Pharmaceutical compounds or compositions: Specific chemical entities or classes.
  • Preparation methods: Processes for synthesizing the active ingredients or formulations.
  • Use claims: Indications, methods of treatment, or particular therapeutic applications.
  • Dosage regimens: Specific dosing protocols.

In medical patents, claims often combine both compound-specific and application-specific features to maximize scope.

b) Scope of Protection

Based on common patent drafting practices:

  • Likely claims the patent covers a specific chemical entity or class with a novel structure.
  • Possible claims the use of this compound for treating a particular disease or condition.
  • May include formulation claims—e.g., particular delivery systems, excipients, or dosages.

If the patent claims are narrowly drafted (e.g., specific compound structures), the scope is limited, leaving room for competitors to invent around. Conversely, broader claims (e.g., a genus of compounds or methods) enhance patent strength but may face validity or patentability challenges.


2. Claim Validity and Scope Challenges

a) Prior Art Analysis

The scope's strength depends on novelty and inventive step relative to prior art. Mexican patent law, aligned with international standards, requires that claims be:

  • Novel
  • Non-obvious
  • Useful

Given that the patent is granted, it has passed formal examination, but validity can be challenged if prior art prior to filing discloses similar compounds or uses.

b) Potential for Patent Thickets or Overbreadth

If the claims extend to large chemical genus or broad therapeutic methods, they risk being found overly broad or obvious in light of existing patents or scientific publications.


Patent Landscape Context

1. Mexican Pharmaceutical Patent Environment

Mexico, as a member of the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and the TRIPS Agreement, maintains a patent framework that safeguards new chemical inventions but faces challenges common in emerging markets:

  • Patent Filing Trends: Growing number of pharmaceutical patents, but also increased scrutiny on patentability, especially concerning patents on naturally occurring substances or known compounds ("evergreening").
  • Patent Challenges: Mexico allows third-party oppositions and post-grant nullity proceedings, influencing patent robustness.

2. Competitor Patents and Landscape

  • Global Portfolio: The patent landscape for similar compounds varies, with key patents often filed in the US, Europe, and Asia. Mexican patents tend to align with internationally recognized compounds but may face local challenges.

  • Local Patent Clusters: Multiple patents for related compounds or formulations might be filed by originator companies or generic manufacturers. MX2014016114 might be part of a patent family covering a broader franchise.

  • Infringement Risks: The scope influences enforceability. Narrow claims limit infringement risks but also weaken patent position, whereas broad claims can provide robust protection but invite validity challenges.

3. Patent Family and Priority Data

Patents related to MX2014016114 in other jurisdictions and patent family structures reveal the extent of protection and strategic considerations—such as filing priorities, continuation filings, and patent term adjustments.


Legal and Commercial Implications

  • A well-drafted, broad patent like MX2014016114 can effectively block generics in Mexico for the claimed uses or compounds, providing market exclusivity.
  • Strategic licensing and litigation depend on the claims’ scope and strength.
  • Infringement analyses require meticulous comparison of claims to competing products or manufacturing processes.

Conclusion

The patent MX2014016114 appears to cover a specific chemical entity or therapeutic application critical to its holder's commercial interests. Its scope hinges on the breadth of the claims—whether they encompass a specific compound, a class, or method—and the validity contingent upon prior art and claim drafting quality. The patent landscape in Mexico presents both opportunities and challenges, with local patent laws favoring robust patentees but permitting challenges that can erode patent rights over time.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope clarity is vital: Carefully examine whether the claims are broad enough to cover relevant competitors’ products or narrow enough to withstand validity challenges.
  • Patent strategy matters: Filing, continuation, and claim drafting influence the patent's enforceability and value.
  • Landscape awareness is crucial: Monitor related patents and filings both within Mexico and globally to identify potential infringement and licensing opportunities.
  • Enforcement considerations: Mexican law permits nullity actions; patentees should ensure claims are defensible.
  • Competitive positioning: A strong patent can serve as a barrier to entry but requires continual vigilance and potential defense against challenges.

FAQs

1. How does Mexican patent law define the scope of a pharmaceutical patent like MX2014016114?
Mexican patent law grants rights over the specific claimed invention, which can include compounds, formulations, or uses. The scope depends on the language of the claims; broader claims cover more but are vulnerable to validity challenges, whereas narrower claims provide limited protection.

2. Can the scope of MX2014016114 be expanded through subsequent patents or continuations?
Yes. Filing continuation or divisionals can extend patent protection, refine claim scope, or address new embodiments. This is a common strategy to broaden or fortify patent coverage.

3. What challenges could a competitor face in designing around MX2014016114?
If the claims are narrow (e.g., specific compound structures), competitors might develop structurally similar but legally distinct compounds. If claims are broad, they may be invalidated on prior art or obviousness grounds. Understanding claim language is crucial.

4. How does the patent landscape in Mexico influence the patent’s enforceability?
The Mexican landscape includes active patent examination but also allows for oppositions and nullity actions, making strategic claim drafting, and patent prosecution essential for enforceability.

5. What strategic considerations should patent holders in Mexico consider for MX2014016114?
Patentees should assess potential for patent challenges, scope of claims, related patent family filings internationally, and opportunities for licensing or defending market exclusivity through litigation or settlement.


References

  1. Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial (IMPI). Official patent database and documents.
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent landscape reports.
  3. Mexican Patent Law (Ley de la Propiedad Industrial).
  4. Industry reports on pharmaceutical patent strategies in Latin America.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.