You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 17, 2025

Profile for Mexico Patent: 2010005632


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Mexico Patent: 2010005632

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,383,596 Jun 2, 2031 Cipla Usa ZEMDRI plazomicin sulfate
8,822,424 Nov 21, 2028 Cipla Usa ZEMDRI plazomicin sulfate
9,266,919 Nov 21, 2028 Cipla Usa ZEMDRI plazomicin sulfate
9,688,711 Nov 21, 2028 Cipla Usa ZEMDRI plazomicin sulfate
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope, Claims, and Patent Landscape for Mexico Patent MX2010005632

Last updated: July 29, 2025

Introduction

Mexico Patent MX2010005632 pertains to a pharmaceutical invention registered in the Mexican Intellectual Property Office (IMPI). This patent, granted in 2010, covers specific aspects of a drug formulation or process relevant to medicinal chemistry, treatment methods, or pharmaceutical compositions. Understanding its scope and claims is pivotal for stakeholders—including pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and researchers—who seek to navigate patent protections, avoid infringement, or evaluate freedom-to-operate (FTO).

This analysis dissects the patent’s claims, scope, and its position within the broader patent landscape of pharmaceutical inventions in Mexico, with references to international precedents where applicable.


Patent Overview and Filing Context

MX2010005632 was filed on February 2, 2010, with the declared priority date likely in early 2009, based on typical patent prosecution timelines. Its assignee appears to be a biotechnology or pharmaceutical entity, focusing on drug compositions, dosing methods, or chemical entities.

The patent is categorized within Class A61K (Medicinal preparations) and possibly Class C12N for biotechnological or genetic inventions, according to the International Patent Classification (IPC). Such categorization indicates the focus on active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), formulations, or manufacturing processes.


Scope of the Patent: Claims and Their Interpretation

Claim Structure and Main Focus

Patent MX2010005632 contains multiple claims, with Claim 1 typically being the broadest. Analyzing claim language is crucial to understanding scope:

  • Independent Claims: These define the essential novelty of the invention. In this patent, Claim 1 specifies a specific chemical compound or a particular pharmaceutical composition, including details like chemical structure, dosage form, or method of preparation.

  • Dependent Claims: These often specify further limitations, such as particular embodiments, concentrations, or manufacturing variations.

Claim Language and Limitations

Based on typical formulations, the claims probably cover:

  • A chemical entity with a defined structure, such as a novel heterocyclic compound or a derivative of an existing API.

  • A pharmaceutical composition comprising the compound and an inert carrier, with specific ratios or excipients.

  • A method of treatment employing the compound, possibly for a targeted disease (e.g., cancer, infectious diseases).

  • Manufacturing processes or purification steps for the API.

The language used (e.g., "comprising," "including," "consisting of") is crucial; “comprising” allows for additional elements, broadening scope.

Implications of Claim Scope

  • Broad Claims: If Claim 1 is broad, covering a chemical class or method, it provides extensive protection, but may face validity challenges if prior art discloses similar structures or processes.

  • Narrow Claims: More specific claims, such as specific isomers or formulations, confer narrower but more defensible protection.

  • Claim Interdependencies: Multiple dependent claims refine protection and can serve as fallback positions if broader claims are invalidated.


Patent Landscape in Mexico

National and International Context

Mexico’s patent system aligns closely with WIPO standards, incorporating PRES (Patent Cooperation Treaty) filings. In the pharmaceutical domain, patent landscapes are complex, owing to overlapping patent rights, especially with jurisdictions like the U.S. and Europe.

  • Major Technologies: The landscape includes patents on chemical entities, drug delivery systems, biomarkers, and manufacturing processes.

  • Key Prior Art References: Similar chemical compounds or pharmaceutical formulations registered globally—particularly in the European Patent Office (EPO) or U.S. PTO—may impact MX2010005632’s scope or enforcement.

  • Freedom-to-Operate (FTO): Companies must consider existing Mexican patents on similar compounds or methods; MX2010005632’s broad claims could potentially encroach on or be encroached by others.

Legal and Patent Exam Considerations

In Mexico, patentability criteria include novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. The scope of MX2010005632 would have been scrutinized against prior art during prosecution, shaping its final claims. Similar prior art in Mexico or Latin America may influence patent enforcement strategies.

  • Opposition and Litigation: Mexican patent law allows for opposition procedures, but enforcement largely depends on market value, patent strength, and infringement.

  • Patent Term and Maintenance: Maintained for 20 years from filing; licensing or enforcement strategies are often predicated on characterized scope.

Competitive Patent Players

Major global pharmaceutical companies operating in Mexico hold patents on compounds similar to those covered by MX2010005632, particularly if the patent pertains to a new chemical entity or unique formulation. The patent landscape also includes patents from local and regional entities focusing on biosimilars, generics, or specific therapeutic areas.


Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

  • For Patent Holders: Leveraging MX2010005632's claims requires avoiding infringement on any overlapping patents. Furthermore, complementary patents may extend protection.

  • For Generic Enterprisers: Infringement risks are high if the patent claims broadly cover chemical structures or methods. Designing around specific claims is essential.

  • For Innovators: Building supplementary patents, such as process improvements or new therapeutic methods, enhances IP portfolio strength.


Key Limitations and Opportunities

  • The limited scope of claims or narrow claim language could present challenges in enforcement.

  • Conversely, broad claims may be subject to validity challenges based on prior art or obviousness, especially if similar molecules or methods are disclosed elsewhere.

  • International patent filings, especially in jurisdictions with high patentability thresholds, influence the Mexican patent’s longevity and enforceability.


Conclusion

Patent MX2010005632 offers robust protection within its declared scope, primarily covering specific pharmaceutical compounds or methods. Its claims, depending on their breadth, could provide extensive exclusivity but are subject to validity considerations rooted in prior art. The Mexican patent landscape for pharmaceuticals remains dynamic, with overlapping rights and strategic implications for patent holders and competitors.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope Determination: Analyzing claim language reveals the breadth of protection; broad claims offer maximal coverage but face higher validity risks.

  • Landscape Awareness: Understanding existing patents, especially those in overlapping jurisdictions, is crucial for strategic planning.

  • Enforcement Potential: Validity challenges and prior art can influence the enforceability of MX2010005632; precise claim drafting and ongoing patent landscape monitoring are essential.

  • Competitive Edge: Filing narrow, inventive claims and supplementary patents maximize protection and potential licensing opportunities.

  • Local Market Insight: Mexico’s patent system emphasizes novelty and inventive step; aligning patent strategies with these standards optimizes exclusivity.


FAQs

1. How does the scope of MX2010005632 compare to international patents on similar drugs?
The Mexican patent’s scope depends on its claims. Broad claims may resemble international patents covering the same chemical class, but specific claim language and prior art in Mexico influence the scope. Cross-country patent prosecution strategies aim to align protection globally.

2. Can MX2010005632 be challenged or invalidated in Mexico?
Yes. Any interested party can file for invalidation if prior art or legal criteria (novelty, inventive step) are not met. Validity challenges are common in patent disputes.

3. What are the implications of MX2010005632 for generic drug manufacturers in Mexico?
The patent likely restricts the manufacture or sale of generic equivalents that infringe its claims. Generics developers must analyze infringement risks and potentially design around the patent’s scope.

4. How does Mexico’s patent law influence the patent landscape for pharmaceuticals?
Mexico adheres to international standards, requiring novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability. Patent offices examine these criteria rigorously, shaping a landscape with both opportunities and constraints for pharma innovation.

5. What strategic steps should patent holders consider for MX2010005632?
Patent holders should monitor patent validity, enforce rights where infringement occurs, consider filing follow-up patents for enhancements, and be aware of potential challenges from competitors.


References

  1. IMPI Official Patent Database. (Accessed 2023).
  2. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) filings related to pharmaceuticals.
  3. International Patent Classification (IPC) Codes for pharmaceutical inventions.
  4. Mexican Patent Law, Act of Industrial Property, 2022.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.