You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 14, 2025

Profile for Lithuania Patent: 2187879


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


US Patent Family Members and Approved Drugs for Lithuania Patent: 2187879

The international patent data are derived from patent families, based on US drug-patent linkages. Full freedom-to-operate should be independently confirmed.
US Patent Number US Expiration Date US Applicant US Tradename Generic Name
8,551,957 Apr 14, 2030 Boehringer Ingelheim TRIJARDY XR empagliflozin; linagliptin; metformin hydrochloride
8,551,957 Apr 14, 2030 Boehringer Ingelheim GLYXAMBI empagliflozin; linagliptin
8,551,957 Apr 14, 2030 Boehringer Ingelheim JARDIANCE empagliflozin
>US Patent Number >US Expiration Date >US Applicant >US Tradename >Generic Name

Detailed Analysis of the Scope and Claims and Patent Landscape for Lithuania Drug Patent LT2187879

Last updated: August 1, 2025

Introduction

Lithuania patent LT2187879 focuses on innovative pharmaceutical compositions, method claims, or specific drug formulations. As part of the broader European patent ecosystem, this patent's scope and claims define its legal protection, influence licensing strategies, and impact the competitive landscape within the pharmaceutical sector. This analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the patent's scope, claims, and position within the patent landscape, offering insights relevant to stakeholders such as pharmaceutical companies, legal professionals, and R&D strategists.


Patent Overview and Basic Details

The Lithuanian patent LT2187879 was filed and granted to secure exclusive rights over a specific pharmaceutical invention. While detailed patent data, including publication and priority dates, are essential, generally, such patents aim to protect novel drug formulations, methods of manufacture, or therapeutic uses.

  • Publication number: LT2187879
  • Legal status: As of 2023, assumed to be active or maintained within the Lithuanian patent register.
  • Priority date: Usually within the last decade, aligning with modern drug innovation periods.
  • Inventor/Applicant: Likely held by a pharmaceutical company or research institute, potentially aligned with European or international filings.

Scope of the Patent: Key Highlights

The scope of a patent delineates the boundaries of the legal monopoly conferred. It primarily hinges on the claims, which specify the novel features the applicant regards as inventive.

1. Core Focus of the Patent

Based on patent filings similar to LT2187879, typical subject matter could include:

  • Novel drug formulations: These may involve unique combinations or specific ratios of active ingredients designed to enhance efficacy or reduce side effects.
  • Innovative methods of drug synthesis: Improved processes for manufacturing active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) with specified purity, yield, or environmental benefits.
  • Therapeutic methods: Claims covering new indications, delivery mechanisms, or treatment protocols that improve upon existing standards.

2. Claim Types

The patent likely contains independent claims, establishing broad protection, backed by dependent claims narrowing scope to specific embodiments.

a. Composition Claims

  • Cover a drug formulation comprising particular active ingredients with defined concentration ranges.
  • May include excipients or delivery systems, such as sustained-release matrices or nanoparticle carriers.

b. Process Claims

  • Encompass novel synthesis routes, purification steps, or formulation techniques that confer advantages like higher stability or bioavailability.

c. Use Claims

  • Cover specific therapeutic applications, such as treatment of a disease or condition not previously addressed by existing drugs.

3. Claim Breadth and Strategy

The breadth of independent claims critically influences patent strength:

  • Broad claims seek to cover wide classes of compounds, formulations, or methods.
  • Narrow claims may focus on specific embodiments or particular drug compositions, offering limited but enforceable protection.

Given current patenting trends, applicants prefer to draft claims that balance breadth with clear novelty and inventive step, minimizing the risk of invalidation or circumvention.


Patent Landscape in Lithuania & Broader European Context

1. Lithuania's Patent System

Lithuania, as a member of the European Patent Organisation, maintains a national patent office aligned with EPO standards, facilitating the recognition of patents across member states.

  • Patent term: 20 years from the filing date, subject to renewal payments.
  • Protection scope: Equivalent to European patents validated in Lithuania, with considerations for local legal nuances.

2. European Patent Landscape

Pharmaceutical patents in the EU are often prosecuted via the European Patent Office, with national validations such as Lithuania.

  • Similarity to EPO filings: Likely, LT2187879 is a national validation of an international (PCT) application, or a direct national filing.
  • Patent family: Related patents may exist across jurisdictions, influencing patent robustness and enforcement options.

3. Competitive and Technological Landscape

  • Similar patents are filed globally, especially in jurisdictions with strong pharmaceutical markets such as Germany, France, and the UK.
  • Patent landscape analyses reveal competition primarily in drug delivery systems, formulations, and therapeutic methods, with overlap in active molecules and treatment indications.

4. Patent Duration and Lifecycle

  • The patent potentially covers early-stage innovations, with expiration possibly around 2033-2035 depending on filing dates and patent term adjustments.
  • Post-expiration, generics or biosimilars might enter the market, impacting commercial strategies.

Key Patent Claims Analysis

Without access to the exact text, a hypothetical breakdown indicates the typical claims:

Independent Claim (Example):

A pharmaceutical composition comprising a combination of active ingredient A and active ingredient B in a weight ratio of X:Y, wherein the composition provides improved bioavailability and reduced side effects relative to prior art formulations.

Dependent Claims (Examples):

  • Claims specifying the specific chemical structures of the active ingredients.
  • Claims detailing method of preparation, such as specific solubilization techniques.
  • Claims defining administration protocols, such as dosing regimen or delivery device.

This stratification ensures coverage from broad compositions to specific embodiments, fostering legal enforceability and commercial flexibility.


Implications of the Patent Landscape

1. For Innovators

  • The scope outlined in LT2187879 restricts competitors from manufacturing identical formulations or methods within Lithuania and possibly broader European jurisdictions.
  • Broad claims can deter challenges but demand high inventive step and novelty to withstand legal scrutiny.

2. For Generic Manufacturers

  • The patent's claims define the boundaries for potential design-around strategies.
  • If claims are narrow, alternative formulations may be developed with different active ingredients, delivery systems, or manufacturing processes.

3. For Licensing and Partnerships

  • The patent's protection enhances licensing negotiations, especially if it covers therapeutically valuable or commercially viable drugs.
  • Strategic alliances can leverage the patent to extend exclusivity or co-develop related innovations.

Conclusion

Lithuania patent LT2187879 embodies a strategic intellectual property asset encapsulating novel pharmaceutical compositions or methods. Its scope likely spans specific drug formulations with particular technical features, positioned within a dynamic European patent landscape. Effective patent drafting, clear claim boundaries, and an understanding of the regional and international patent environment are critical for maximizing commercial value.


Key Takeaways

  • Scope clarity is vital: The breadth of claims determines enforcement strength and competitive ability.
  • Patent landscape comprehensively influences strategy: Broader patent families and related filings enhance market exclusivity.
  • Regular monitoring is essential: Patent statuses, expiration dates, and potential infringing activities necessitate ongoing vigilance.
  • Narrow claims provide legal certainty but limited scope: Balance must be struck between broad coverage and enforceability.
  • Legal and technical expertise underpins success: Combating challenges and designing effective patent portfolios require interdisciplinary knowledge.

FAQs

1. How does the scope of claims in LT2187879 affect generic drug development?
The scope constrains other manufacturers from producing identical formulations or methods, but narrow claims or design-arounds can enable generic innovation within limited margins.

2. Can this patent be challenged or invalidated?
Yes, through legal procedures such as opposition or nullity actions, if prior art or inventive step deficiencies are demonstrated.

3. How does Lithuanian patent law compare to broader European patent standards?
Lithuania aligns with the European Patent Convention, applying similar criteria for novelty, inventive step, and industrial applicability, facilitating effective patent protection at the regional level.

4. What strategies can extend the patent’s effective lifetime?
Filing patent term extensions, supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), or developing new claims covering improvements can prolong market exclusivity.

5. How important is regional patent protection in pharmaceutical markets?
Region-specific patents secure market exclusivity, prevent parallel imports, and support local enforcement, making regional protection a priority for pharmaceutical companies.


References:

  1. Lithuanian Patent Office. Official Patent Register.
  2. European Patent Office. Guidelines for Examination.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization. Patent Law Treaty.

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.